• kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:57 PM
    It is not RPF, it is some establishment shills that post here. It should not be forgotten the weekend in 2015 that the Neocons released the #nevertrump strategy it was echoed here full blast by a variety of so called self proclaimed Paul supporters.
    55 replies | 629 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:55 PM
    Spot on. It is obvious, yet the media continues to make fools of themselves further diminishing what little credibility they once had.
    59 replies | 1101 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:14 PM
    As long as the mission is what benefits the people within the borders of the United States and I believe this to be true, then more power to him and he will finish the mission. Americans will support him every step of the way like they did Trump. But if it believed he is running in the best interests of some of the entities that fund him then we will see through it that he is a sell out that deserves to lose. We all will be watching and if he betrays us he will be crucified before he has a chance.
    4 replies | 129 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:59 PM
    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/24/amazon-alexa-recorded-conversation We have learned to love Big Brother.
    0 replies | 34 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:53 PM
    For the last few hours switching bank and forth between Music Choice, Alternative channel and their Indie channel.
    4723 replies | 246211 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:40 PM
    Unless you can piece it together this seems like a whole lot of nothing. Stern is a piece of shit for making this an issue and I say this as someone who listened to him as a fan from the beginning and found him entertaining. The question is what was Trump thinking going on Stern if he ever thought of running for public office. Trump appeared as one the guys and down to earth. A guy you would never expect to run for office. Stern prompt's guests to respond outrageously. How else was Trump expected to respond considering the venue? Read the article, sounds like a whole lot of nothing.
    1 replies | 51 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:26 PM
    Well then congrats for not getting anyone pregnant at the time that would require you to be enemy of the state as a result of it. :eek:
    26 replies | 341 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:12 PM
    "he never had a job", this is simply not true,. If you read the article he did work at Bestbuy but was discriminated against as a single Dad. Mothers were given time with their children on weekends but he was denied the option. If we truly live in a gender equal society then this should not have happened. The parents offered to pay his health insurance but he wanted to stay on Medicaid to meet the poor person requirement for Medicaid and legal bills for which looks to be a child is involved. Do you have any idea how much lawyers cost and the draconian laws related to child support? People will do anything to stay out of jail due to their poverty and I do not blame them. We should not be prosecuting people and throwing them in jail for being poor. Not sure if that is the case here but in the majority of cases where children are involved it is. The real story here is not this individual but rather the scumbag media that rather than report real news are taking advantage of a poor man with problems for a story. They do not care who they hurt or who they take advantage of for a story. Again demonstrating the news media is the enemy of the people. Do you have young boys? If you do, how do you think they will react when they have a gun pointed to their head to produce rather than left to produce on their own? Which one do you want them to live in? A society that believes in the non-aggression principle or what we have now?
    26 replies | 341 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    526 replies | 8095 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:35 PM
    Well, I think that on paper, it disregards humanity. It assumes that everybody will choose to work for a common good, that the bureaucrats will always make exactly the right decisions for that common good, and that the common good is indeed the greater good. Reality, which capitalism addresses, is that people are greedy. And that what's good for you might be bad for me.
    22 replies | 291 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    74 replies | 358 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:22 PM
    The news media made him with their false narrative, again demonstrating who the real enemy of the people is in the US.
    11 replies | 164 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:24 PM
    39 replies | 450 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:54 AM
    Apparently it is beyond you to distinguish between the government and the people running it. The fact (and it is indeed a fact) that the sanctions were not against the country and/or the populace doesn't mean a damned thing to you. You are now literally hallucinating a fictional reality in order to avoid the truth of the matter, which is that your beloved socialism always ends up with the socialists in charge looting the populace. FFS, Chavez's daughter is now far and away the wealthiest person in the country. Obama put the sanctions into place to try to prevent specific individuals from taking their loot and fleeing to America while avoiding broader sanctions against the country which would harm the populace. This just yet another entirely predictable failure of socialism, and face it: you were wrong again. There were no sanctions against Venezuela. Long paragraphs of speculations won't change that.
    22 replies | 291 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:37 AM
    So all you have to do in order to defeat this is vary your grip while doing this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV2ViNJFZC8 Or you could just borrow someone else's phone. Or use a one-time "burner." In other words: this won't do a damn thing to catch "terrorsts" or crooks. But it certainly might be useful in compiling even more extensive dossiers on "normal" people who don't have anything to worry about because they haven't done anything wrong ...
    4 replies | 97 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:44 AM
    And charity should come from individuals, not the CIA. But their leader won't allow that. This is exactly why socialism always fails in reality. On paper, it's a great plan. In reality, the psychopaths have all the power. The allegation that this is a CIA orchestrated failure is as crazy as Firestarter though.
    22 replies | 291 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:22 AM
    You know, I was going to write out a reply to this, but there's just way too much to get into. Whole books have been written on this topic, so it's not something that we can adequately cover in a few paragraphs. I mentioned this before, but I'll say it again. There was a big division in early Christianity, between vegetarians and meat eaters. There is plenty of very compelling evidence that Jesus' brother James and a number of the disciples were vegetarian. Since the student can't be greater than the master, I think it would be very odd if Jesus was not a vegetarian, and I believe that for a number of reasons. You may think this is crazy, but it is argued that certain passages were inserted in order to portray Jesus as carnivorous. That wouldn't surprise me at all, especially when the Bible itself states that lying scribes changed things. And when you consider that the heart of God – a heart of love, mercy and compassion – does not go along with putting ones tastebuds first, above the life of an animal who wants to live. But again, there's way too much to this topic, and we are already way way way off the original topic.
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:48 AM
    Swordsmyth, you're much smarter than this. Let's make this as simple as possible. Which one of these is more demonic: a) exploitation, violence, torture and killing, for selfish reasons… Or b) loving, valuing, and protecting all life? Please answer honestly.
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:43 AM
    Swordsmyth, I've noticed that you are either ignoring or quickly glossing over numerous points I've brought up, but then you keep throwing up the same handful of scriptures that meat eaters always use. If you're not going to take much time to address the things I've said, then I'm not going to take the time to go over each of these points you brought up. There are certain things that are undeniable. God commands us to be merciful. God commands us to love and treat others the way we want to be treated. You can argue that he meant that only for humans… But God created the animals too, they live here with us. We treat our dogs and cats like members of our family, we love and cherish them. Why would you apply love, kindness and the golden rule to your beloved dog, but not to another animal who is equally as intelligent and emotional? The Bible states that God's mercy extends to all creation. So why do we limit our mercy only to cats and dogs?
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:35 AM
    I'm sure you know that it's logical fallacy to dismiss a claim based on a person who states it. And that was just one example, the article talks about a number of early Christians who wrote the same thing, including Josephus and others. Not to get too off topic here, but many people do not know that there was a big division in early Christianity, between vegetarians and meat eaters. We know who won out. But again, we're getting into other topics… And since this originally was a thread on eggs, I'm not going to get into all that here and now.
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:18 AM
    We're really not though. In fact, that may the reason (or one of the reasons) that after the flood, the lifespan of man went down from several hundreds of years, to only 120 years, and then down from there. And now, things like cancer, heart disease and other illnesses are near epidemics… We are clearly not living the way we should be living. Perhaps we should go back to how God originally designed us? Also, here's a video to watch:
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    05-23-2018, 11:40 PM
    Do you really believe that God would endorse killing and meat-eating shortly after saying the exact opposite? God does not change, if He designed us to live in peace and harmony and nonviolence… Why assume that all the sudden he did a complete turnaround? First of all, it was an offering or gift, not quite the same thing as the animal sacrifices you have mind. Secondly, the word that you are hinging your entire argument on, the word translated as "fat", does not automatically mean what you (and many others who grew up eating meat) assume it means. I'm going to post an excerpt from an article on this passage, and I will bold some of the pertinent parts. However, some early Christians such as the Montanists apparently thought Abel offered the dairy products of his flock: In the second century the African Montanists were sometimes called the "Artotyrites" because they added cheese, instead of wine, to the bread in the Eucharist on the ground that the Aquarii, and first men offered the fruits both of the earth and of their flocks (Gen. iv. 3, 4). http://www.wpl.lib.oh.us/AntiSaloon/print/wine.html
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    05-23-2018, 10:44 PM
    That is one study, I could show you hundreds of studies that show meat is linked to numerous health problems. Also keep in mind that many of those "studies" which say animal products are healthy are funded by those very industries. Also, it should be pointed out that the protein or other nutrients that you can get from animal flesh you can also get from much healthier, cruelty-free plant-based foods. In fact, that is where the dead animal got his protein from… Plants. So you're getting those nutrients second-hand. Why not just cut out the middleman and go straight to the original source? I know the answer to that. :) Because we all grew up eating hamburgers, steaks, etc.… And we love those things, and it is extremely hard – incomprehensible, even – to consider giving those things up. But actually, it is not hard at all when you have that lightbulb "aha" moment after seeing the reality of what the animals go through. The horror of it, to the point of it being almost diabolical. And what for? Not for survival, but to satisfy our selfish personal desires.
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    05-23-2018, 10:30 PM
    No, that is contradictory and nonsensical. God did not design us to be omnivores when the first chapter of the first book of the Bible clearly states that our original diet and way of living was plant-based, peaceful and non-violent. It has been said that the fallen angels (written about in Genesis 6 and in several extra-biblical texts) taught man to eat animal flesh. If that is true, then the origin of meat eating is demonic. Think about this…. Why would God design creations that he loves only to be brutally and selfishly eaten by another one of his creations? If God originally designed animals to be food, why would he create them with the ability to think, feel, love, have families and enjoy life? Do you really think that a loving God would create beings with the ability to feel pain and suffering… if he meant for them to be killed as food? That would be sadistic, completely cruel and devilish. No, we were not originally created as omnivores. Genesis 1 makes that perfectly clear.
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    05-23-2018, 10:20 PM
    What pre-flood Scriptures are you referring to in your claim that they were sacrificing animals? Genesis 9 has a few different interpretations, but that could be a topic in and of itself. God permits many things in this fallen world that he does not like and were never part of his original design/intent. Divorce, for example. Polygamy. And many other things. Here are some things that can't be denied: 1) God's original design was for us to be herbivores and live in peace and harmony with the animals.
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    05-23-2018, 09:55 PM
    That's not what I was objecting to in that post. I was objecting to his claim that God designed us to be omnivores. It could be debated that we evolved to be omnivores (I'm not saying I believe that, I'm saying that the argument could be made)...but the claim that we were originally designed to be omnivores is what I was arguing against. BTW, Swordsmyth is more than capable of handling himself. I don't want to be rude but it's not necessary for you to reply for him. :) Especially if you misunderstand my points and what I'm arguing.
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    05-23-2018, 09:38 PM
    Desires? That's ironic, because it seems to me that many Christians are twisting God's heart and character, all because of their fleshly desires for things they love to eat and can't ever imagine giving up… (putting their stomach and desires above all else) even if it means supporting cruelty, torture and the animal industries' complete disregard for God's creation.
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    05-23-2018, 09:34 PM
    Wait. Your Legoland has a bar?
    14 replies | 181 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    05-23-2018, 09:32 PM
    Where? If you're going to make a claim, be specific. Are you denying that the word 'meat' used in the King James version simply means food?
    74 replies | 636 view(s)
More Activity

48 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    This is over a week late, but I wanted to reply to your neg rep comment. I actually was here in 2007, under a different screenname/account, (wildflower) but that's besides the point. I simply have a different opinion on your actions regarding the whole Gunny thing. But I don't feel like arguing about it any further, so that's all.
  2. View Conversation
    He's not a new member. He's been here for years.
  3. I am sure you are happy to see me back so I thought I would take a little initiative and say hello.
  4. View Conversation
    I'll return the rep just give me time.
  5. View Conversation
    Proof Of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey Into The Afterlife with Dr. Eben Alexander III

  6. View Conversation
    You're welcome.
  7. google Anna Mae Aquash
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 48
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About LibertyEagle

Basic Information


Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.

Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

The Property Basis of Rights


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
10-20-2017 12:10 PM
General Information
Join Date

61 Friends

  1. AdamT AdamT is offline


  2. american.swan american.swan is offline


  3. angelatc angelatc is offline


  4. BeFranklin BeFranklin is offline


  5. Bryan Bryan is offline


  6. CaptainAmerica CaptainAmerica is offline


  7. Conservative Christian
  8. Crowish Crowish is offline


  9. Deborah K Deborah K is offline


    Deborah K
  10. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 61
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast



  • 12:51 PM - Hidden


  • 09:46 AM - Hidden


  • 08:20 AM - Hidden










  • 09:35 AM - Deleted Posts




  • 03:09 PM - Hidden



  • 10:13 PM - Deleted Posts


  • 11:37 AM - Deleted Posts

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 147 1231151101 ... LastLast














Page 1 of 147 1231151101 ... LastLast