• Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:33 PM
    Cop Gets FIRED After Teens Yell "F the Police" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vE6jbrr1gE {The Civil Rights Lawyer | 17 June 2024}
    12 replies | 1303 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:09 PM
    And those are just the warm-ups for FPC's own SCOTUS case: THREAD: SCOTUS will hear FPC's "ATF 'frame or receiver' rule" lawsuit (VanDerStok v. Garland)
    568 replies | 46337 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:06 PM
    FPC doing warm-ups for its own SCOTUS case: THREAD: Trump Bans Bump Stocks
    8 replies | 849 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:53 PM
    I just came across this post from March while looking for something else, and, well ... damn: I think he'd get a kick out of it, though, now that he doesn't have to put up with any more of the bullshit of it all. Rest in peace, man. You are missed. :sorrow: (← that's for us, not for Scott)
    25 replies | 685 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:42 PM
    It doesn't really matter. They'll still vote for him anyway - or for whomever they replace him with.
    2201 replies | 168121 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:29 PM
    //
    27 replies | 1346 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:25 PM
    h/t @oyarde: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?566836-Blue-city-crime-craziness&p=7236296&viewfull=1#post7236296 Secret Service agent robbed at gunpoint on night of glitzy L.A. fundraiser for Biden https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-06-17/secret-service-agent-robbed-at-gunpoint-on-night-of-biden-glitzy-l-a-fundraiser https://archive.ph/yO2Qm] {Karen Garcia | 17 June 2024} Tustin police are investigating the alleged robbery of a member of the U.S. Secret Service whose possessions were taken at gunpoint. On Saturday at 9:36 p.m., officers responded to a call of a possible robbery at the Tustin Field 1 residential community at Tustin Legacy — a former military base turned residential development.
    124 replies | 12965 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:04 PM
    That's why Trump is just a half-assed gun-grabber, whereas Biden, et al. are full-assed gun-grabbers. Just exactly so: Also just so:
    568 replies | 46337 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:55 PM
    Funny you should mention that. As it happens, NYC is working on developing its own version of "collapsed mines", too: THREAD: New York City is falling apart
    13 replies | 667 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:33 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to CCTelander again.
    568 replies | 46337 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:40 PM
    How it started: How it's going:
    13 replies | 667 view(s)
  • LibertyEagle's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 08:40 PM
    That is good that it got shot down. This is a good example of the downside of Trump not knowing the Constitution if it hit him upside the head. It makes him too easily led astray in an emergency, because he doesn’t have those constitutional principles to rely on when pressed. One of the many reasons he needs Rand in his ear.
    51 replies | 4602 view(s)
  • LibertyEagle's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 08:31 PM
    Drudge? I seriously doubt they covered it, but I don’t watch it. But, since you must, what did they post about it? You sound like you have no clue about the Council on Foreign Relations. It basically has a revolving door with the State Department. Many of the international organizations we involve ourselves in are first pitched at the CFR. If you are honestly interested, you could subscribe to their journal called Foreign Affairs for awhile, or go to a University’s library and go through a ton of them from an assortment of years. There is also a book called “The Shadows of Power”. I think the author was James Perloff.
    303 replies | 12824 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 08:28 PM
    THREAD: Trump Bans Bump Stocks
    51 replies | 4602 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 08:24 PM
    You see, if the law is clear, then people might know what it is. And if people know what the law is, then they might try to get around it. So to prevent that, the law needs to be vague and inscrutable to anyone who isn't a government bureaucrat. That way, government bureaucrats will be free to decide if and when to apply it "on a case-by-case basis".
    568 replies | 46337 view(s)
  • LibertyEagle's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 08:21 PM
    That isn’t Thomas Massie at all!
    303 replies | 12824 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 08:13 PM
    They're coping and seething and seething and coping ... https://x.com/shannonrwatts/status/1801975437381316721 The Group Helping the Supreme Court Rewrite America’s Gun Laws Is Worse Than the NRA https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/06/supreme-court-nra-gun-laws-bump-stocks.html {Dahlia Lithwick & Mark Joseph Stern | 15 June 2024}
    568 replies | 46337 view(s)
  • LibertyEagle's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 08:07 PM
    Massie is so great!
    1 replies | 314 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 07:50 PM
    "The opinion was written by Justice Thomas" https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1801621025093788144 :cool: FPCGear.com https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1802375575253692640
    568 replies | 46337 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 07:24 PM
    Corrupt "Super Mayor" ATTACKS Children https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/corrupt-super-mayor-attacks-children:c {Actual Justice Warrior | 15 June 2024} In this video I discuss the "Super Mayor" taking revenge on the Park's District that she has had a long standing dispute with. Sources: Local Segment On Auto Show: https://youtu.be/DBk5vKtffkI New Segment: https://youtu.be/fKKscy64jvM
    56 replies | 4066 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-16-2024, 06:48 PM
    Jones' willful disobedience of court orders may justify the making of a default judgement against him, but it doesn't justify the egregious degree of the damages awarded after that default judgement was rendered (especially if they end up including Jones' social media accounts - see below). And in any case, whatever the degree of damages (whether egregious or not), they are supposed to represent liability incurred for defamation, not liability incurred for disobeying the court (which liability was already accounted for in the making of the default adverse judgement). So, no - any egregiousness of the awarded damages is not warranted by Jones' disobedience, the proper remedy for which, depending on the kind and manner of disobedience, is something along the lines of "contempt of court" or, in the limit, adverse judgement by default (which is what happened in this case). If they are so concerned about recovering damages from Jones, then why are they trying to deprive Jones of his ability to "promote new business ventures"? It makes absolutely no sense to seek to recover damages by imposing conditions that are explicitly specified to be for the purpose of delimiting Jones' ability to exercise a means of earning the resources required to be able to pay those damages. Pray tell, how does deliberately impairing Jones' ability to "promote new business ventures" redound to the benefit of the plaintiffs or of their chances of recovering damages? And of what possible value are Jones' social media accounts, anyway, if they are no longer owned or controlled by Jones? I wouldn't be surprised if just the mundane and routine legal costs involved in depriving Jones of ownership and transferring it to someone else are more than the accounts are even worth without Jones behind them. Such a process appears to be aimed, not at compensating the plaintiffs for damages, but at applying a surreptitious kind of "prior restraint" by impeding or preventing the defendant's ability to publish anything at all (including things having nothing at all to do with the original defamation). It's like suing an old-fashioned newspaper for defamation, and then, after winning the suit, demanding that ownership of the newspaper be granted to the plaintiffs (or the state) in order to "deplatform" the publisher. But at least in the case of an old-fashioned newspaper, the physical plant of the newspaper would at least continue to be worth something significant even if ownership was seized and transferred. That is not the case for Jones' social media accounts, the seizure of which seems to be motivated by the desire to punitively silence him, and little or nothing more (it certainly won't serve to help make the plaintiffs whole in any significant way). And what is to happen if, after seizing Jones' social media accounts, Jones simply creates new ones (which will, of course, end up being more valuable than the seized ones, by virtue of the fact that they will be Jones')? Are such new accounts then to be seized as well, under the same justifications? If not, then what is the point of having seized his previous accounts (which would now be of little if any value)? If so (which seems must be the case, if the justifications for the previous seizures are to be accepted), then how would that not dovetail perfectly with the claim that "hey won't stop until Jones' 1st Amendment rights are taken away" (your reply to which is still a non sequitur), whether one actually believes that claim or not? Jones being held liable for defamation does not in any way obviate (and is not mutually exclusive of) a deliberate attempt to exploit that holding of liability as a means of squelching Jones (especially given the feds' self-admitted proclivity for "nudging" things in the direction they desire).
    47 replies | 1307 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 09:58 AM
    Who said there was? :confused: Such statements do nothing to substantively rebut the claim that "they won't stop until Jones' 1st Amendment rights are taken away". On the contrary, the fact that they are seeking to seize Jones' social media accounts - despite and in addition to the fact that Jones has already been adjudicated liable for defamation (and egregiously so, at that) - indicates that they indeed "won't stop won't stop until Jones' 1st Amendment rights are taken away". That the article referenced in the OP explicitly states that "the families on Wednesday asked a U.S. bankruptcy judge in Houston, Texas, to additionally take control of Jones' X.com account and prevent Jones from using it to promote new business ventures" (bold emphasis added) only serves to reinforce that indication (especially given that Jones is unlikely ever to discharge even a significant fraction of his adjudicated liability if his ability to "promote new business ventures" is impaired).
    47 replies | 1307 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 09:34 AM
    If he didn't make the difference and they were going to win anyway, then what do they owe him a favor for?
    121 replies | 4332 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 12:40 AM
    THREAD: Rand condems Trump conviction in letter to Garland
    234 replies | 19316 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 12:38 AM
    THREAD: Massie Discusses Trump Trial and Congressional Hush Money
    234 replies | 19316 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 12:34 AM
    Another genius Chicago Democrat presents another way to "tackle violent crime" - just don't tell anyone when violent crimes happen:
    27 replies | 2023 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 12:31 AM
    //
    24 replies | 2153 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 12:31 AM
    Ana Kasparian DESTROYS Democrat For Hiding Crime https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/ana-kasparian-destroys-democrat-for:4 {Actual Justice Warrior | 13 June 2024} In this video I discuss a recent TYT segment where Ana Kasparian calls out a Chicago Alderwoman for deciding to cover up increasing crime rather than address the problems in her ward. Sources: Original TYT Video: https://youtu.be/MOqS0QvVwP0 Brutalist Architecture Problems: https://www.1828.org.uk/2022/07/15/how-brutalist-architecture-erases-history-and-causes-social-decay/
    27 replies | 1346 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 12:22 AM
    //
    93 replies | 2726 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    06-15-2024, 12:22 AM
    Democrats Make Disrespecting Pride A FELONY https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/democrats-make-disrespecting-pride-a:5 {Actual Justice Warrior | 14 June 2024} In this video I explain how vandals are doing minor bits of damage to symbols of gay pride across the nation & that is leading to major felony charges & law changes like we didn't see during the BLM riots. Sources: Florida Segment 1: https://youtu.be/sI6ZZbo3sbA Florida Segment 2: https://youtu.be/_7s5mifKhEQ
    27 replies | 1346 view(s)
More Activity

48 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    This is over a week late, but I wanted to reply to your neg rep comment. I actually was here in 2007, under a different screenname/account, (wildflower) but that's besides the point. I simply have a different opinion on your actions regarding the whole Gunny thing. But I don't feel like arguing about it any further, so that's all.
  2. View Conversation
    He's not a new member. He's been here for years.
  3. I am sure you are happy to see me back so I thought I would take a little initiative and say hello.
  4. View Conversation
    I'll return the rep just give me time.
  5. View Conversation
    Proof Of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey Into The Afterlife with Dr. Eben Alexander III

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOSb3G53HsA
  6. View Conversation
    You're welcome.
  7. google Anna Mae Aquash
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 48
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About LibertyEagle

Basic Information

Signature


================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.

Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

The Property Basis of Rights

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
52,361
Posts Per Day
8.40
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
48
Most Recent Message
10-20-2017 12:10 PM
General Information
Join Date
05-28-2007
Referrals
2

60 Friends

  1. AdamT AdamT is offline

    Member

    AdamT
  2. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  3. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
  4. BeFranklin BeFranklin is offline

    Member

    BeFranklin
  5. Bryan Bryan is offline

    Admin

    Bryan
  6. CaptainAmerica CaptainAmerica is offline

    Banned

    CaptainAmerica
  7. Conservative Christian
  8. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  9. Deborah K Deborah K is offline

    Member

    Deborah K
  10. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline

    Member

    DonVolaric
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 60
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

04-07-2023


11-13-2020


12-19-2019


08-27-2019

  • 02:22 AM - Hidden

08-25-2019

  • 12:13 AM - Hidden

12-30-2017


10-25-2017

  • 12:51 PM - Hidden

10-23-2017

  • 09:46 AM - Hidden

10-22-2017

  • 08:20 AM - Hidden

08-22-2017


04-25-2017


04-07-2017


04-06-2017


03-30-2017


03-03-2017


03-02-2017


02-28-2017


12-20-2016

  • 09:35 AM - Deleted Posts

09-20-2016



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 159 1231151101 ... LastLast

06-17-2024


06-16-2024


06-11-2024


06-10-2024


06-06-2024


05-12-2024


04-22-2024


04-20-2024


04-10-2024


05-21-2023



Page 1 of 159 1231151101 ... LastLast