Superfluous Man
Banned

In other words: * Completely dumbed-down is the new American way. * Curiosity killed the cat. * Art such as paintings, photography and sculptures are not permitted. * Hobbies involving airplanes, rocketry and chemistry are reserved only for government personnel.

With the help of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) Initiative (NSI), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has identified common signs of terrorism-related suspicious activity. What is Suspicious Activity? Observation / Surveillance A prolonged or unusual interest in facilities, buildings, or infrastructure beyond casual or professional interest. Photography

September 15, 2023 Campaign Mission The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) "If You See Something, Say Something®" program is a national campaign whose mission is to raise public awareness in two primary areas: * Recognizing signs that may indicate a potential nexus to terrorism. * How to report suspicious activity to appropriate law enforcement authorities.

by Katie Sobko September 6, 2023 Folks sitting in traffic over the holiday weekend may have noticed the unsettling messaging on signs along the state’s major interstates. A new “See Something, Say Something” public safety campaign was launched on Sept. 1 on variable message signs, the ones on highways that have messages that can be changed, throughout the state, according to the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness.

How many more $5,000,000,000,000 $10,000,000,000,000 $20,000,000,000,000 $33,000,000,000,000 TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS before people finally catch on? Got a good round number?

Using Risk/Reward, I use some of RFK's talking points, since (D)emocrats are more apt to listen to another (D)emocrat. I then expand the conversation to see where it might eventually go. Using Risk/Reward, I use some of Tulsi's talking points, since (D)emocrats are more apt to listen to another (D)emocrat. I then expand the conversation to see where it might eventually go. If you have other suggestions and/or 100% PROVEN and APPROVED strategies, kindly drop them into the Suggestion Box for possible consideration.

That is strange, isn't it? At the time I compiled RFK, I was attempting to reel some of the leftist/democrats to the ideas of Free Markets, and to discuss Ukraine, Captive Agencies, Lobbyists, etc. It was an opening for me, since they would never give the likes of Ron Paul the time of day. But as you can see at the bottom of his record sheet, I did in fact include his Domestic Platform, one that I am not fond of: On top of that, you have done a good job of providing information in that thread, so I did not bother to update it anymore. There is little to nothing that I hold democrats accountable for. As an Agorist/Anarchist/Whatever/Whatever, the republican party is supposed to be more inline(?) with my views. As such, even though I do not vote , they should be "held accountable", certainly when they speak the language but seldom come through on the house floor. I provide information so that others can easily reference it and "hold them accountable" also. If my approach doesn't jive with you, well, simply move on and read something more to your liking.

What a strange, but typical, response to this thread. Gee, I wonder: But take note, I did include the source link in the OP, for those who couldn't care less about the bad votes, and have the need to gleefully cheer him on :rolleyes:

Ya gotta start somewhere. Small-Cell communities can establish their own standards and go from there, and hopefully evolve into what the FSP is in Anti Federalist 's area.

You outta see prices around these parts. Plus, it sounds like according to the article, they are attempting to escape the stranglehold of .gov. I am not sure why more folks wouldn't be proponents of that? Have people become that thoroughly indoctrinated?

:tears: I tried my best to refrain from saying: And don't forget what Obumer said, my fellow Free-Staters republicans, "If you see something, say something" - THAT way once the FEDS push them out of their own community, they will have no choice but to migrate/relocate to the beautiful North East :D Amerikans are too pussy-whipped to attempt what those folks are doing. Which is why the phrases "Flat Tax across the board" and "everybody must pay their fair share" became so popular. :mouthopen:

Imagine that. Attempting to live outside the confines of authoritarian government. Better send fully armed IRS agents, DHS, outside LEO agencies, even more surveillance on private property, and whatever else is required to stomp them out. Eminent Domain could also be utilized here. People want less intrusive government, until they kick and scream for more intrusive government. It seems some people always think they know what's best for other people, and will use whatever exaggeration and fear tactics they can to impose their will. The article did seem to use all of the required terminology, don't ya think?

I never did before, nor do I now, consent to any of that GARBAGE in the OP. h/t CaptUSA

So far, nothing, but it would have been fun to watch. Dave brings up some valid points, such as getting the message out there, which Ron Paul has and continues to do. Like Dave, I probably would not even be aware, had it not been for Ron. I tend to think of "the message" as a stepping stone, where once the person is/becomes fully aware, the voting booth/active politics is not the way forward. As far as policy, it is good to have messengers such as Ron Paul, Tom Massie, Walter Block, Gary Bennet, Patrick Smith and a whole host of others, but the real and only solution comes down to the individual practicing civil disobedience. Tom Massie, (who I have had the pleasure of hanging out and conversing with), though he is a congressman, agrees with that also. I believe that it takes many approaches to "get the message out there", which hopefully and ultimately leads to the individual governing him/her self. In the end, once one has matured and self-confident enough, Patrick's and Larken's methods are the only true and actual solution.

Matt Gaetz On The Record

ID for All. It's part of the continuing saga agenda.

It may very well be a disconnect. I can tell you first hand that many of the immigrants who I personally know are conservative and very hard working. I have very close friends who are Filipino, some from Mexico, a few from Syria, a couple from Iran and other places. I would much rather have them as friends than some of the dumbed-down Americans who worship the state. Though, I am sure that different areas attract different types of folks. Which is why I do not lump-group people, and mind my own business as far as other areas are concerned. I don't even know how to respond to that. I know what you are trying to say but to me it is abhorrent and utterly unacceptable.

They We hate us for our freedoms. With all due respect, we haven't establish anything. What I am saying, is that if incentives were cut, and there is nothing to be had, they would either have to find work, or move on to elsewhere. If they attempt to rob you in your home, you have every right to do what is necessary. If the community cuts incentives, I doubt very much community would side with whomever attempts to rob you. I most certainly have. By way of the state/fed taxing me, and also to restrict my freedom to travel, among other things. Of course, some folks would consider 10%, 30%, 65% acceptable, and claim that I have not seen a loss of wealth and liberty yet. And my question becomes, at what % would you consider it my loss? 90%? Complete Eminent Domain? Biometric Implant to track who I am and everywhere I go? Would it be considered a loss then?

Before literally begging for ways to further reduce our own wealth and completely forfeiting our liberty, the smart thing to do would be to address the root problem. One does not donate millions to the mafia in hopes that it will just vanish.

And when economic calamity happens here in Amerika, one will not have a place left on earth where one can escape to. I'll just put this here for now... until somebody else posts the more draconian-desired measure:

.Gov, is that you calling? They, like me, will have to weight Risk versus Reward. My home is not a gun-free-zone.

A Small-Cell-Community of privately-owned-property-owners can do whatever is absolutely necessary, without affecting my right to travel through public land. The small-cell-community would "just say no" to free schooling, free housing, etc. I would mind my own business and worry about my own solutions for me and my own family/community. I approach it the same way that I do concerning meddling/foreign policy.

Anti Federalist Government is not going to save you. Not even fed.gov, even if they did what you propose. The redistribution of money will continue to occur, as shown in the OP, which also emboldens the police-state, while RFK, Trump, and other politicians propose "national security solutions" and people cheer it on. You can build all the walls that you want around the entire country and line them with machine guns. But as long as philanthropists and NGO's coordinate and facilitate the red carpet, and "heart-felt" tax-payer money is redistributed , there will always be supply/demand which keeps the revolving door open. Which brings me to thinking again about Tom Wood's podcast a couple of years ago, and how that would be a viable solution; Small-Cell Communities. Buy yourself some private property in an area like FSP and other parts of the country which are doing the same. Once the area is Privately Owned, you have more and legitimate control. I doubt FSP would provide free anything for immigrants, or even red-blooded Americans who do not want to work. They certainly would not approve $63M going to "Favorite Staffing" based out of Kansas. The overall problem is not going to rectify by implementing half-ass solutions (they only makes things worse), or even during my/your lifetime for that matter. You are dealing not only with immigrants, but red-blooded Americans who have no problem paying "their fair share of taxes" which facilitates it all.

When you quote “military age men”, that is another msm scare tactic. The “men” are obviously not babies/little kids, nor are they beyond retirement/nursing home age. Military age men: teens to +/- 50. You know my position, and I will not sway from it. Cut the funding, and stop welcoming them with open arms. Other than that, be prepared for more costly and draconian measures, which is exactly what this government wants to impose. It is all part of the plan.

Here's a no-brainer: Stop requesting/giving money. And the problem goes away on its own. No police-state apparatus needed.