Tab Content
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    07-06-2017, 11:00 PM
    15-year-depression: http://www.thedailycrux.com/content/1333/US_dollar http://ronpaulsurvivalreport.blogspot.com/2008/02/shocking-news-ron-paul-predicts.html?m=1\ https://www.thestreet.com/story/11041675/1/ron-paul-predicts-hyper-inflation-says-dollar-will-be-rejected-as-reserve-currency-of-the-world.html https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/14/speaking-of-people-whose-models-have-failed/ https://plus.google.com/+KentonVarda/posts/h1xbNvNLZKr http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaGawH9h-1s&t=1m21s http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/iran_attack_plan_146.html I really shouldn't have to cite Ron Paul's predictions of massive unemployment, a market crash, currency crises, hyperinflation etc. because he is so damn well known for it. Might as well ask me to prove that John McCain is a warhawk.
    42 replies | 1527 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    07-02-2017, 04:53 AM
    That's as much a result of technological innovations than anything else.
    5 replies | 365 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-29-2017, 02:11 PM
    Ron Paul, Paul Schiff, Peter Schiff, and people like them have been preaching doom and gloom forever. Plus, there are their ideological biases. They call 20% of the reason why a recession will happen, and when it does, claim that the 20% was the 100%.
    42 replies | 1527 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-28-2017, 08:48 PM
    Well, Peter Schiff has called twenty two of the last two recessions.
    42 replies | 1527 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-28-2017, 01:46 AM
    Just because the rule was in place, doesn't make the water clean. I'm all for the legal system letting people sue states and water companies for providing tainted water.
    3 replies | 155 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-26-2017, 09:10 PM
    Didn't Ron use dynamic scoring in his own budget?
    3 replies | 277 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-26-2017, 07:53 PM
    Slavery? No one is forcing the guy to be a baker. All we are saying that if he wants to be a baker, there are certain rules he has to follow. This is why I mentioned that this is a distraction. Taxes and regulations have real consequences. They really stifle businesses, growth, etc. But preventing people from being racist or bigoted doesn't do the same; if anything, removing those kinds of barriers enhances productivity. Like you mentioned, his concerns about "God's commandments" are utter bogus. I mean, you could easily flip this. What if a guy believes that God's commandment is that he has to force people to live a Christian way of life? What if he uses government to do so? If you try and stop him, you are denying him entrance to heaven! Wouldn't that be a terrible thing? Sure, there are poor applications of the principle, but that shouldn't mean throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Some traffic laws are not good, but that doesn't mean all of them are bad!
    65 replies | 1919 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-26-2017, 05:19 PM
    I suppose the idea is that a business isn't being forced to do something it doesn't do, but being forced to do something it does. IE, a Chinese restaurant doesn't serve tacos. But they can serve egg rolls to everyone. You can just as easily say that if you don't want to respect the norms and laws of the place your business is set up, feel free to set up your business elsewhere. In any case, I think this is a distraction. Over time, any company that discriminates on the basis of sexuality is going to go down the tubes, not by government decree, but by simple social norms. Lets focus on reducing taxes and regulations that actually have major impacts on us that silly issues like this.
    65 replies | 1919 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-26-2017, 05:17 PM
    You are equating the Nuremberg laws with anti-discrimination laws?
    65 replies | 1919 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-26-2017, 01:25 PM
    One way to see it is that Colorado already has laws that force public accomodations to serve people regardless of that persons's status. I'm not sure why the Colorado baker thinks he is above the law. Plus, equal protection and all that.
    65 replies | 1919 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-26-2017, 01:31 AM
    Hmm, no, I think that is not a correct assessment of the situation. The fact is that Americans tend to have the "dream big" mentality. The idea of telling a kid, even someone who is 12 or 13 that college maybe isn't for them, and that they should go to a trade school (like they do in many other parts of the world) doesn't really jive with the culture. Everyone wants to be the next CEO, pop culture icon, etc. At the least, people are all aiming to be engineers, scientists, doctors, etc. There is this push to highly educate everyone; kids need to be told that you are better off being a good plumber than a bad engineer.
    32 replies | 874 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-26-2017, 12:06 AM
    Scott Sumner mentioned recently that there is a bit of a geographical issue. There is a lot of demand, for example, for construction workers in the coasts. There are a lot of people who could do construction work in the middle of the country, where there isn't much demand. Getting people to move isn't that easy. Not only is there reluctance to increase wages, but reluctance by workers to uproot their families and move, invest in a new place, etc.
    32 replies | 874 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-25-2017, 08:28 PM
    There was a farm in Alabama (or some other state, I cannot remember) that had to hire legal workers after the town enacted strict penalties for hiring illegal immigrants. The farm owners set pretty high wages, with benefits and time off, and got many people to sign up. But after one day, a large portion of the people left. They found the work too difficult...
    32 replies | 874 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-25-2017, 02:32 AM
    Actions you like -> Free speech, free action, exercise of freedom Actions you don't like - > hooliganism, breaking decency, breaking laws, etc. Laws you dislike -> Violates some principle, not sanctioned by the Constitution, etc. Laws you like -> Sane interpretation of Constitution, upholding property rights/preventing fraud.
    75 replies | 1402 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-21-2017, 08:04 PM
    Do you want inline citations for every single claim? Uber's issues have been a big part of the news. Are any of the stories I talked about false? Numerous times, but I think most recently in the thread in the main Ron Paul sub-forum. For the record, no. But why would it matter, anyways? Can only Americans non-Jews be a part of this forum? Ugly identity politics.
    26 replies | 578 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-21-2017, 07:15 PM
    Keep telling yourself that. I didn't say total freedom, I said economic and regulatory freedom. Is Illinois a flyover state? Facts on what?
    26 replies | 578 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-21-2017, 05:13 PM
    Yes, because California's agriculture sector is the main reason for its prosperity. Silicon Valley popped up and continues to thrive under the super-regulated California system. Look at that Cato study; the states that rank the best in terms of regulatory and economic freedoms are the flyover states (save for like, Florida). Really? Progressives treat government like God, even when constantly criticizing and questioning government. I don't like some aspects of progressivism due to the naivete, focus on outcomes, and some other things. But the idea that progressives treat government like God is a silly attack. That's like saying you treat government like it is literally Satan.
    26 replies | 578 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-21-2017, 01:56 AM
    "Right-wing capitalism?" What is that? Have you looked at what is going on in SF and the Bay Area? It is the shining beacon of how capitalism creates wealth. SF people actually like capitalism, but just want to fetter it a little bit. They don't treat it like a religion like some do...and look at that, the economy of California is one of the strongest in the world. From what I know, Lyft isn't being "punished" or blamed all that much. Once in a while, people will complain about shoddy background checks and causing traffic congestion (like in this case), but they haven't received the vitriol that Uber has because they haven't had the issues Uber has had. Uber's had the issues with sexual harassment/assault, the questionable labor practices, the issues with how they treat whistle-blowers, Greyball, the issues with tracking people without their knowledge, Kalanick joining Trump's council, the whole thing in New York, the allegations of stealing technology, etc. etc.
    26 replies | 578 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-20-2017, 10:54 PM
    That may be true. It would be interesting to look at the data and the case being made, which will purportedly happen during this hearing. Isn't NYC one of the richer cities in America?
    26 replies | 578 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-20-2017, 09:11 PM
    1) Glenn Greenwald has changed a lot. He was very pro-Iraq war, pro-Afghanistan war, and a staunch supporter of the security state 2) Paul Krugman has amended his views as the immigration imbalance has disappeared. 3) Obama was, in context, condemning the bigotry we have towards illegal immigrants.
    1 replies | 114 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-20-2017, 09:08 PM
    That's a key part of the article. When businesses, firms, and individuals engage in actions that have high social costs, people usually turn to the law to set things straight.
    26 replies | 578 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-20-2017, 01:50 AM
    The thing that boggles my mind...the test results are in. The embargo did not work. In the aftermath of normalizing relations, you had so many people saying how if we had just waited a few more years, the old policy would have worked. It hadn't worked for 50 years! When are they going to look at reality and realize that their view of the world, their idea that force and strength can bend people to your will, just doesn't work? No, this drama is created by people who have utter faith in the crystal clear ideas of neoconservatism, anti-Cubanism, and a foreign policy based off of strength and intimidation. So no matter what the reality is, no matter what the consequences of their policies are (or the consequences of the opposing policies), they will never change their mind, and will always sing the same tune.
    9 replies | 545 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-19-2017, 10:14 PM
    As long as the US continues to only immigrate highly-educated, highly-skilled Muslims, the integration problem the Europeans have isn't going to be a problem. European nations have issues with integrating not just those from the ME, but Asians, Eastern Europeans, etc. It is because they have lax immigration standards. They're getting the rednecks and village idiots of the original countries. The US gets the best of the best; they can typically speak English, are at least college educated (and hence more open to other cultures/ideas), have a valuable job set, and come here willing to sacrifice some culture to improve their lives in real ways.
    157 replies | 4410 view(s)
  • Dr.No.'s Avatar
    06-19-2017, 10:08 PM
    You are never going to get men and woman to be completely equal in all ways. The best you can hope for is inequalities that balance out. Maybe women face judgment and discrimination if they work, but they also get the benefit when it comes to child custody. Maybe men have higher rates of suicide and depression but have to deal with less harassment and stalking. Etc, etc. I would generally agree with you. The problem is the history of this whole issue. "Anti-feminists" have been attacking feminism since the dawn of time. The line of argument that "equality has been achieved today" has been used for more than fifty years. It's very true now, but the problem is it wasn't true back then, and people aren't going to listen to you now since you've been lying about it before. For example, look at Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell. Friedman argued from the 50s that sex-based discrimination had largely disappeared. Sowell made that same point since the 70s, pointing to some very ***** studies that this was the case. The thing is, back then, not only did you have a cornucopia of studies showing a wage gap, but you had literal stories of companies having policies of not hiring women, glass ceilings, etc. It was a ridiculous argument to say that equality had been even close to reality. And, the feminists remember. By being so erroneously used, the arguments can't even be used when accurate.
    49 replies | 1234 view(s)
No More Results
About Dr.No.

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
406
Posts Per Day
1.38
General Information
Last Activity
07-17-2017 11:51 PM
Join Date
09-29-2016
Referrals
0
No results to display...
No results to display...
Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast

07-07-2017


07-06-2017


06-29-2017


06-28-2017


06-27-2017


06-26-2017



Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast