Tab Content
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:21 PM
    Non metallic. :D
    5 replies | 80 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:46 PM
    4645 replies | 240442 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:37 PM
    I suggest you find someone else's time to waste.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • Raginfridus's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:20 PM
    QAnon, is that you?
    29 replies | 266 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:11 PM
    I suggest that you vote Trump and Trump and Trump, and stop bothering sentient beings.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:08 PM
    On an unrelated note..
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:00 PM
    I meant, if he should manage to win the primary, then screw the party and everyone who fought him. Tell people the truth, burning down the GOP in the process. If he only gets a few votes, it doesn't set "the swamp" on fire. It does nothing, except inspire a few future leaders. But that is better than nothing: continued cooption, dying slow.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • Raginfridus's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:48 PM
    What does that make 2 days they work now? 0 would be optimal.
    1 replies | 40 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:40 PM
    Once again, you're not listening. Let me bold and underline my point to avoid any possible miscommunication: Rand should run. He will not win. He should run to make a point. Let Atlas shrug. The base won't support him. They'll support retard, or Pence, or some other bolshevik. ...but, a few non-morons out there might be enlightened or at least encouraged by the endeavor.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:29 PM
    You're not listening. The goal, for a classical liberal these days, can't be winning elections. That's preposterous. I just want somebody to make a statement.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:25 PM
    He's an extremely popular figure among Trump supporters. Why this is so should be no mystery; watch him some time. He, like BillO and various other whores on FOX slobber on Donald. ...but teh Deep State's fighting him
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:18 PM
    No, they'd spend all of their energy trying to get on the ballot. Rand's a sitting US Senator, whose owed a favor or two from Turtleface. He should run and, once the primary's won (no problem), tell them all to go fuck themselves and get real. Go Ron.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:59 PM
    Since the departure of relentless Trump promoter/Paul trasher Bill O'Reilly, SnowBall is the most prominent Trump shill in the mainstream media. He does nothing but stir up anti-immigrant and related nationalist sentiments; this is what he is paid large sums to do. If you are pleased with the shift of the GOP toward nationalism, you really ought to send him a fruit basket.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:52 PM
    I'm not seeing any evidence that the GOP has the liberal inclinations you claim. I don't follow. What does the GOP base, the Trump wing in particular, being absolutely useless have to do with whether or not Rand should run? As I said some posts up, Rand won't win, but someone must make a stand and put something in the books for future generations to contemplate.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:48 PM
    We shall defeat the Demoncrats and make our tribe proud; MAGA!
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:43 PM
    So afraid of "demoncrats" as to not care whether it is the aforementioned non-persons or "their" party which massively grows government. That's it, of course. The number of shits which the average GOPer gives about policy is exactly 0 (zero). Their enthusiasm is limited to beating the "demoncrats" (which means continuing the same policies, under different leadership).
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:41 PM
    1991, George HW Bush marches into Eye-rack. Clinton maintains US presence. GW Bush invades a second time, ostensibly to finish the job. Obama pledges how he would have us out by June of his first year, but never gets us out, though he lied and said we were. Trump seems to be ready to maintain our presence in this string of seemingly ridiculous entanglements. Democrat or Republican - it has made no difference. So why then have we remained in these ruinous endeavors for 27 years to date with such perfect consistency, despite the purported deep philosophical rift between Rs and Ds? I don't think any of this is in the hands of either side. There is something far deeper at work here. If Theye could make a creep like Obama so brazenly break his biggest campaign promise, perhaps they have something on Trump as well. The presidents in question were marketed as widely variant in terms of their personalities and world views. If this is actually true, how is it that we have had twenty seven years of such perfectly consistent circumstance where our engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan are concerned?
    3 replies | 141 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:33 PM
    Since that travesty, Trump's approval ratings have increased, and the generic Congressional ballot has closed toward GOPers. That would suggest that, at best, Trump's base doesn't care at all about these issues. ...which is also obviously true, if one goes out beyond the Facebook version of reality and talks to people.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • Raginfridus's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:14 PM
    4645 replies | 240442 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:10 PM
    Which claim you base on what...? I mean, you didn't like it, and the four other sort-of-libertarians who've supported Trump were pissed, but the rest?
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:03 PM
    Ah, yes, I remember the big grassroots outcry when the Congress passed and Trump signed a multi-hundred bullion dollar spending increase. It was like...
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:58 PM
    Ah, I see we got demoted to the Rand Forum (which, these days, is a kind of exile, isn't it?). It's important to make sure there's plenty of room for asinine pro-Trump conspiracy theories in US Politics, amiright?
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:54 PM
    You believe that most Trump voters share your ideals...? If you mean wanting to restrict immigration, yep, that's true. But as far as making government smaller, no, lol, they don't share those values.
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:51 PM
    That's questionable reasoning, but, if we're to take that route, the median is a monarchy with a parliament of some sort (not popularly elected).
    36 replies | 412 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:48 PM
    Hogwash, the drug is: 1. Moral-hazard-creating and subsequently bust-creating (and "fixing") cheap money policy by the central bank 2. $4 trillion budgets devoted overwhelmingly to popular and corporate welfare (including DoD spending). 3. $3 trillion in pure dead-weight loss from regulatory compliance. Our problems aren't in China; they're in Washington D.C. (or, everywhere Boobus gets to vote).
    120 replies | 1417 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:40 PM
    4645 replies | 240442 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:30 PM
    Not yet (it can't happen here, of course...), but the naivete that you're displaying in thinking that you can somehow co-opt or redirect the energy of the Trumpenproletariat toward liberal goals is very reminiscent of the attitudes displayed by the German upper classes before the deluge (some of whom financed the NSDAP for fear of communists ). Same with the Russian aristocracy. They almost literally (in some cases literally) dug their own graves - all based on an absurdly inflated opinion of the man on the street (who, to their chagrin, was less inclined to thank than rob and hang them).
    53 replies | 406 view(s)
  • r3volution 3.0's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:20 PM
    Allowing everybody to vote is a bad idea? Huh, ... Now, whoever could have predicted that this would become a problem (...I mean, except every literate person who ever lived prior to ~1789 AD)?
    36 replies | 412 view(s)
  • Raginfridus's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:18 PM
    Q isn't fighting anything, its a joke.
    13 replies | 171 view(s)
More Activity
About uncharted

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1

Signature


"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever." - Founding Father Thomas Jefferson

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
50
Posts Per Day
0.09
General Information
Last Activity
Today 12:58 AM
Join Date
09-28-2016
Referrals
0

23 Friends

  1. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  2. devil21 devil21 is offline

    Member

    devil21
  3. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline

    Member

    Dr.3D
  4. Ender Ender is offline

    Member

    Ender
  5. InterestedParticipant
  6. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  7. Lamp Lamp is offline

    Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing

    Lamp
  8. Madison320 Madison320 is offline

    Member

    Madison320
  9. Origanalist Origanalist is offline

    Member

    Origanalist
  10. osan osan is offline

    Member

    osan
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 23
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

02-12-2018


09-07-2017


07-17-2017


07-15-2017


06-30-2017


11-17-2017


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

04-14-2018


03-24-2018


03-03-2018


03-02-2018


02-07-2018


02-05-2018


02-04-2018


02-02-2018


01-23-2018


12-31-2017


12-22-2017


10-26-2017


10-25-2017



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast