uncharted
Member

They seem to be capable of turning even the State of Israel anti-semitic. https://twitter.com/TorahJudaism/status/1780009080494416035 1780009080494416035

I still can't get past the fact that Israel created Hamas... https://twitter.com/TorahJudaism/status/1780009080494416035 1780009080494416035

Don Genocide is just as catchy. No more, no less.

And these people are being paid to do this. Make no mistake about that. Paid and brought in by bus, by people who damned well know that what you say is true. This psyop isn't about shoving goofy crap down our throats. That's just how they're pissing us off. This is about making the population angry.

Yup. That's what this is. It serves two purposes in this massive psyop. First it gives street cred to the controlled opposition "bad boy". Then, later, it gives cover to people like Hunter Biden, because by the time their shit catches up to them, trials of political figures are widely considered a joke.

Oklahomans don't wait for cops to show up.

Leftists really have gotten out of hand since they retired all the steamrollers.

Let's just see who's lying, shall we? "You" in this case being every citizen? Every able-bodied male citizen? Something like that, right? You literally want to line up to have some government kommisar inspect your gun? Kinky. I've heard of femme-dominated dungeon slave games like that. But then, the kommisar you're daydreaming about would be a man, right? Even kinkier.

Want to bet? You bet your evidence and I'll bet mine. If RFK gets on the Democrat ticket as this year's candidate for president, I'll never post here again. If that doesn't happen by Election Day, you never post here again. Is it a bet?

Wow. I never thought anyone would have less credibility with me than a politician. It takes a special brand of constant accusations, delivered as facts, even though the person spewing them couldn't possibly know any of them for certain, to degrade a person's credibility to that level.

You called for new and increased taxes. First you said that you are the only one putting forth real world solutions, then you put forth the proposition that enacting a bunch of new state taxes will convince Congress to scrap the income tax(!). It's ridiculous. Except when you assert that government interfering in trade is an unqualified good. Except when you insist that voting for someone not part of a major political party is bad. Look the word up. Then you'd not only know what hegemony means, you'd be able to spell it.

The Spin™ is in.

I don't get it. I just don't get it. It's like what Spock said about humans, we have empathy for one death but the death of a thousand is just a statistic. But this is weirder to me. Oh, you aren't hardly the only one who gets all weak in the knees around any celebrity, but couldn't give two shits about anyone whose name you've never seen in the news. But it still weirds me out to see anyone say nothing at all about multiple people held in actual prison without naming any charges at all, then get weepy as a woman watching As the World Turns over a celebrity missing a damned commencement ceremony. I don't get it. I just don't. Feels inhuman to me. Do I know how angry he is? No. I don't get all doe-eyed and weak-kneed over angry white male celebrities. Not my kink. But I doubt either he or Barron wants to sit through the damned boring obligatory nonsense. Which makes your little "Leave Brittney Alone!!1!" crying jag even funnier.

I can't think of any genocide Joe's involved in that Trump didn't start, wouldn't continue, and/or wouldn't keep financing for some "ally" or another.

Yeah, I know where you're stuck at. Theye're counting on that. Good luck with that in this day and age.

I maintain my insistence on https://freedomisobvious.blogspot.com/2021/07/amendment-xxix.html

I gave up there.

I get your point. What Sonny Tufts seems to be missing is the fact that you don't pick your plaintiffs. Well....sometimes people do. Rosa Parks wasn't the first black women not to give up her seat on a Montgomery bus, but the woman before her was a single mom and back then the left cared about appearances. Fast forward to the 21st century and a druggie who robbed a pregnant woman at gunpoint, but nonetheless was murdered by a cop (no excuse for Chauvin to have his knee on Floyd's neck 2 minutes after Floyd no longer had a pulse), became an international hero for....dying. And it's not like there haven't been more sympathetic black people killed by police. Elijah McClain was just walking home listening to music, wearing a ski mask because of his allergies and he was attacked by police and then overdosed by EMTs with ketamine. That was just a year before George Floyd. But how many people know his name? (I had to look it up). I think Floyd was a matter of timing. It was close enough to affect the 2020 election and far enough away from the First Step Act for all of the goodwill Trump had generated in the black community to have evaporated.

Possible perjury for him having said he didn't have such messages on his phone. Needlessly delaying and driving up the litigation costs by not cooperating with discovery. Disobeying a lawful court order. Yes. The attorney screwed up multiple ways. But it also sounds like Alex didn't tell the truth about whether or not he did any texts about Sandy Hook. There are two possibilities. 1) Alex just "forgot" and his lawyer didn't refresh his memory by helping him search through his own cell phone. 2) AJ didn't want the records out and told his attorney not to turn them over. It's still his attorney's screw up. He should have convinced Alex to turn the records over and explained to him how they would mitigate the situation. The Paul Joseph Watson comment about the COVID dummies and his statement "This is like Sandy Hook" wasn't necessarily fatal to their case. They could have argued that both were examples of unintentional mistakes that were cleared up as soon as possible. Sometimes the best answer is "I don't recall" as opposed to an emphatic "No." But also in this case there was a specific question that Alex could easily check and verify. Further, 99% of the time before you have someone under oath you do written discovery AKA interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Normally you have 30 days to comply though the time often gets extended. So there was probably an interrogatory question on paper that said "Do you send or receive any text messages about Sandy Hook" followed by "produce any text messages you sent or received about Sandy Hook." The lawyer should have found that, told Alex the answer to the interrogatory was "yes" and then created a file with a copy of all of those messages to turn over. Why that didn't happen? That's between Alex and his lawyer.

Rand and Trump? Trump didn't veto it, dude. He signed it. Amash and Paul were the two working toward the same end. They might have stood a chance if Trump hadn't been involved. Or is that a truth you can't handle?