uncharted
Member

One more thing I noticed. The woman who is replacing the public defender is a democrat. So the judge switched defenders from someone who may have actually been motivated to defend his client to someone who has a reason not to defend her client. Hmmmm. But I'm afraid that the driver will take a plea bargain and we'll never get to see any evidence.

What is Goodwin's law?

:rolleyes: All that shows is your ignorance of Goodwin's Law. It doesn't apply when the subject at hand is nazis. And the subject at hand is neo nazis protesting about a confederate statue. You lost the internet today buddy.

Okay. Of course the real point of this thread is that there is no evidence whatsoever that Steve Bannon is racist and yet he gets tagged with that label. One can argue about Trump's comments. But Bannon's comments on this matter are unassailable. And I've seen no other evidence of Bannon being racist. I'm not a Bannon fan. His 1 trillion dollar stimulus plan it bat guano crazy. (Actually liberals should love him for it.) He's just not racist.

So if I buy gold jewlery with Bitcoin and sell it at a pawn shop.....?

I'm not condoning idiots on the left or the right. Trump falls in the idiots on the right category. But this thread is about Steve Bannon. He unequivocally called the right wing Charlottesville protesters "clowns." He made the right call. If Donald Trump had a lick of sense he would have followed Steve Bannon's example from the jump on this. But...and here's the irony...Steve Bannon is the one who gets canned and keeps getting the "racist" moniker as if he is the bad actor in this scenario. If anything Bannon is better off without Trump.

You know, if I knew ahead of time that a bunch of neo nazis were going to show up to protest the Federal Reserve I would stay at home. 1 Corinthians 15:33 Do not be misled: "Bad company corrupts good character."

The term "tea party" didn't mean the same thing when we did the tea party money bomb as it did once Sarah Palin et al took over. Similarly the meaning of "alt-right" today is not the same as it was when Bannon used the term. I have not seen anyg racist at Breitbart. I've seen false claims by the media of so called racist articles but in my admittedly brief investigation. every article that ADL claimed was racist turned out not to actually be racist. Feel free to prove me wrong with a link to an actual racist article at Breitbart.

Yay higher taxes?

Bevensee says as much, but when, where, and with whom have antifa dialogued "nuances" in "less polarizing avenues," as she puts it? The so-called anti-fascists shutdown public forums and march in the streets. They're only interested in discussion, when they dominate the forum, or after their demands have been met. When they appear on TV, its with a sellout like Tucker Carlson (definitely not a representative of anybody except Rupert Murdoch), but they mostly prefer to stir a ruckus so celebrity personalities do their talking. That's what I mean, when I say these nihilists are oblivious to their handlers: they're rent-a-drones fighting rent-a-drones.

Supremacy Clause only applies to powers granted by the Constitution. In all other cases the Tenth Amendment makes it clear that all powers not given to the federal government by the Constitution are retained by the states and the federal government has no just power to act. In fact Jefferson said that when the federal government stepped outside of its constitutional boundaries that it was up to the states to nullify such laws as they deemed unconstitutional. As for Article 1, Section 9 is about slavery and not immigration. As per the very anti-immigration Heritage Foundation's article on Article 1 Section 9: You have been taught this before, that you continue to try and spread historical error as truth exposes you as a liar. That you do so with the Constitution in order to justify unconstitutional and illegal actions by the US government exposes you as just another Big Government Progressive looking to warp the Constitution from its original meaning so you can use violence to force your beliefs on others. That article even explains why it says "persons" instead of slaves.

I'm still trying to figure out why they don't specifically test for high levels of lipoprotein (a) in the blood. From what I've learned, that's the marker that would indicate a person is going to have problems with heart disease. To learn more about this, you can read here.... https://www.paulingtherapy.com/science.htm

That a socialist state won't be able to borrow and spend as much doesn't bother me in the slightest. If our own debt-addled semi-socialist state were dependent on foreign bond markets, I'd be rooting for it to be cut off too.

It's part of waking up to the truth that damn near everything surrounding the 9/11 and OBL/AQ narrative was crap. Dare I say that even Ron's blowback statements weren't completely accurate (probably a political necessity however), so if one accepts that blowback wasn't what caused 9/11 then one must accept that Scheurer's OBL commentaries were crap. He, of all people, would know the real story about OBL. If he wasn't honest then indeed, once a spook, always a spook.

tu stultus esPN

I've been warning about an imminent shutdown for a while on RPF. I still 99% think the shutdown will happen but because of the bigger economic reset/reordering under way, petrodollar death. The Trump Wall shit is just a smoke screen for bigger banker agendas. The important part will be to pay attention to what Congress does during the uproar and confusion since history shows they change things when no one is looking (see Federal Reserve Act passage). Gonna get interestin' very, very soon methinks. A whole lotta crap rolling down hill at once...

Plus they talk too much while the game's on. They should spend more time shutting up and/or making sammiches.

Buying trillions of dollars of an asset doesn't affect its price? Amazing! Is that magic generally applicable, or just when the Fed's the buyer? Having a central bank allows them to borrow more cheaply, and hence encourages more borrowing than there'd otherwise be.

Trump had it right in his initial reaction where he blamed both sides. He really screwed up in his second speech where he called the driver a murderer. Presidents aren't suppose to be declaring guilt before the trial, especially when there's a good chance the guy is innocent, at least of murder.

The "such" persons were slaves- we already went round and round on this. And state's rights were always supposed to be above federal.

Wasn't it the cops that forced the 2 groups together and surrounded them? Looks like a set up to me.

I agree, I thought you were defending Zippy who keeps telling me that QE is not the money supply.

I don't know that there is a conspiracy here. I tend not to see conspiracy when plain stupid explains it so well. The Antifa are insane Socialist tyrants as terrible as the idiots waving Nazi flags and calling for a race war. The difference is that the Alt. Right has developed more of a central leadership while the Antifa is more like a bunch of related individual cells working towards the same goal. Because it is decentralized it is harder to peg anyone as being THE problem, which results in a more complicated formula. And if there is anything the MSM doesn't do well it is "complicated." Simple stories sell better. The real victim I think are all those who are NOT Antifa and who are out there protesting Alt. Right Nazisms and violent nationalism who get lumped into the Antifa groups because, again, trying to actually explain that there are dozens of groups, and tens of thousands of people who are there protesting the Alt. Right but who aren't Antifa and who represent ideologies from across the political spectrum, is probably too complicated for the simplistic narratives that the MSM sells. Anyone who has the experience that whenever they protest Antifa and someone immediately calls him or her a Nazi knows exactly what I'm talking about. Now, why simplistic stupid narratives sell so much better, either because the masses are stupid or because they're being dumbed down, is probably a chicken and egg scenario.

Yea, one of the more under-reported stories of the day. Shows clearly where his priorities lie, and it's not with fiscal conservatism.

I doubt Bannon's a racist; he does obviously pander to racists. He consciously guided Breitbart toward nationalist/racist politics over the last several years. He himself called Breitbart a "platform for the alt-right," and that movement, as he well knows, is primarily about white identity politics.

Sound points Seconded

I'm sure plenty of the nationalists on here will be all over California for this one, but it is actually acting constitutionally here. Nowhere in the US Constitution is the US government given the authority to regulate immigration. That was a power left to the States. Each state therefore has the right to create whatever immigration policy that can be passed through its government and into law. Federal agents showing up at a state court in order to enforce federal immigration laws and threatening states whose immigration laws do not match up with federal immigration laws are a double overreach of the limits of federal authority and power as outlined by the Constitution.