Swordsmyth
Member

I have to agree with your own mental assessment. What you are missing is that those who are not explicitly for or against him are placed in either the for or against him camp in different situations. And I reserve nothing that is not given by GOD in the Bible. You trying to ignore everything that contradicts your advocacy for invaders and traitors and pretending that there are not circumstantial rules (like killing in self defense or the defense of others) creates an impossible and self contradictory doctrine, but you don't care because you only care about quoting scripture to your profit. I render unto GOD that which is GOD's, and unto my nation that which is my nations. They do not contradict eachother.

I posted it as a source of news, then I gave the correct analysis of the events. You then tried to cast doubt on what I said by citing the authority of the author of the article as if he knew better what the attack was intended to achieve.

Because it's obviously wrong, the guy killed at butler was not killed to send a message to MAGA voters, he was killed because the bullet missed Trump. The same is obvious here. Nice try at an appeal to authority, but no cigar.

You'll never achieve that, no matter how hard you try to spin the conversation around.

I already answered that, to everything there is a time and a season. Christ said both that those who are not with him are against him and that those who are not against him are with him, a flat contradiction to the simple minded, but an intelligent person understands both are true in different circumstances and that circumstances dictate which one applies. I also said that we should just expel the vast majority of them, mercy is not something they have a right to, but it is good for us to indulge in. You are not always required to to do the best thing, but it is the best thing to do.

They didn't need them in 2020, and it's too dangerous to resort to unless they think he will beat the cheat this time, they could set off a revolution if they succeed, but they count that outcome as less bad than if he wins.

LOL It's all right here for everyone to see, you can't lie about it, but you try to anyway: Me: "he's not throwing the race" that's clearly what I was talking about, it's the main point of AG's post.

At least 20 Trump supporters may have been attacked covertly by chemicals or a high-power laser at a Trump rally in Tucson on September 12. Some victims suffered severe burns. Many were temporarily blinded, with symptoms lasting until today. Others may have been affected but have yet to be identified. The fact that all those known to have been affected were sitting on the stage immediately adjacent to President Trump is important in understanding the significance of what happened. Experts believe the symptoms resulted either from a chemical agent or, more likely, from a high-powered infrared laser attack. Thus, while chemicals were initially blamed, physicians and retired military experts experienced in chemical-biological-nuclear-directed energy warfare now believe it was an attack by an unseen infrared laser. Another clue pointing toward a laser attack is that those affected occupied a finite area, namely, two rows of 10 people adjacent to Donald Trump. Unless someone unleashed an aerosol spray that no one detected, a chemical attack would have a wider affected area. Also, the only areas on their bodies affected were those that were exposed, i.e., not protected by clothing. A laser capable of inflicting this level of damage is commercially available on Amazon. Because light in the infrared spectrum is not visible to the human eye, no one would have seen an attack of this type while it was happening. Some types of bulletproof glass would have afforded protection, but since this was an inside rally, no protective glass shield was used. Still, while a laser attack seems like the most likely cause for the injuries people experienced, experts are not discounting a possible chemical attack. Currently, knowing exactly how the attack occurred is not the most important thing. The critical issue is that it happened, and it can happen again. The closely gathered group of victims points to a conclusion that the specific 20 people ending up in the hospital—all of whom immediately adjacent to Trump—was no accident. Instead, it sent a very strong message. If you get close to Trump, you will suffer. More at: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/09/trump_supporters_apparently_attacked_at_rally_with_clandestine_weapon.html

The archetypal thief. Ecclesiasticus 34:22 “He that taketh away his neighbour's living slayeth him; and he that defraudeth the labourer of his hire is a bloodshedder.” King James Version (KJV) https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org...asticus-34-22/

Yes, you are the one who tried to change the subject back and forth to suit your twistings. I said that Trump was not allowing anyone to walk all over him in this race, you tried to bring up the problems people caused him in his term in office even though that's not what we were talking about, so I explained how you were still being twisted and deceptive about that too, then I brought things back to the original subject of the race where nobody is walking all over him.

What part of standing instructions do you not understand. And it's clear why you deceptively edited my post, you don't want to deal with this: and gave help to those engaged in killing invaders whom he did not specifically command.

John 10:10 “The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” King James Version (KJV)

Ecclesiasticus 34:22 “He that taketh away his neighbour's living slayeth him; and he that defraudeth the labourer of his hire is a bloodshedder.” King James Version (KJV) https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Ecclesiasticus-34-22/

GOD repeatedly told men to do it and gave help to those engaged in killing invaders whom he did not specifically command. "Thou shalt not kill" is properly translated "Thou shalt not murder" (unjustified killing). The Bible justifies and even commands killing in many circumstances. Killing invaders in defense of your nation is not murder any more than killing in the defense of your own life or the lives of others is, in fact it falls into the latter category. The burden is on you to show that Christ changed the rules about killing invaders and robbers, he told his followers to sell their garments to buy swords, and it was not just to look cool walking around with them.

Maybe you should try not deceptively editing quotes. It said this: All French were slaughtered no matter what side they took or if they didn't take a side. And other whites got killed at the same time.

We are not talking about any candidate in the current race, stop trying to confuse people. We are talking about the entire deepstate that opposed him while he was in office and severely limited what he could accomplish, you are the one who tried to change the subject to that instead of this election. He had limited power to fire the people who needed to be fired, both because of unconstitutional civil service laws and because of the political balance of power and the RINOs, and yet he did fire a number of people. Bolton got absolutely nothing out of him, he gave him a powerless job and proceeded to ignore his ideas and humiliate him. In this campaign nobody is walking all over him, and he certainly is not allowing it.

You need to read the Bible, it's full of GOD aiding people to kill invaders to drive them from their lands. It also says this: John 10:1 “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.”

A: we are talking about the current campaign which AG pretends to believe Trump is throwing. B: to have a stronger opponent walk all over you is not the same as allowing it.

Because we can choose to grant them privileges. Just as we can choose to show mercy and deport them instead of shooting them.

It would be an improvement over where you get yours if he was.

He's not allowing anyone to outplay him or walk all over him, that's what he's not. What counts as a Demoncrat is constantly shifting left, but he's well outside of the current definition, more like some late 80s Democrats, and definitely to the right of many RINOs.

Invaders have no rights here. They have them in their homecountries, but not here. And I can remember when the pro-invader people argued it wasn't an invasion because they weren't armed. (even though that doesn't make it not an invasion and many were armed)

The administrative state is unraveling as hundreds of unconstitutional rules are being challenged after the Loper Bright decision. Rules range from SEC mandates and anti-farming rules to transgender mandates and citizenship for migrants. The left, gloriously, is panicking. pic.twitter.com/4GFbFWyUTh — Peter St Onge, Ph.D. (@profstonge) September 19, 2024 https://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1836744549181407331

Reports of shoplifting and vehicle theft increased considerably in Springfield, Ohio, following the arrival of thousands of Haitian refugees, according to data obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation through a records request. https://dailycaller.com/2024/09/16/exclusive-shoplifting-and-vehicle-thefts-soared-as-haitian-migrants-poured-into-ohio-town-police-data-shows/ But trust us, they'd NEVER steal people's pets to eat, NEVER NEVER NEVER!

LOL I've said Vance may have made a mistake by citing a particular case, you won't admit all the other cases that are real and you cling to the official denials by the liars who are importing the pet stealers and eaters.

Globalist corporatarians selling their country and liberty for a fistful of dollars. (which they will have taken from them by those they sell their souls to)

Any questions? The “Republican” Springfield Mayor who doesn’t want Trump visiting his city is a Democrat donor. pic.twitter.com/l4SNfLtXBJ — Natalie Winters (@nataliegwinters) September 19, 2024 https://twitter.com/nataliegwinters/status/1836757460754846205 1836757460754846205 Makes you wonder about lots of other people.

If they thought they could steal it they wouldn't be trying to kill him.

He's not, and you know he's not.