Yesterday, 12:48 AM
This article continues a discussion on the U.S. government’s use of neuroscience and directed energy to develop weapons which can secretly affect the brain and body from a remote location without requiring surgically implanted neural technologies.
Government scientists during the Obama-Biden Administration described plans for large remote surveillance systems which determine a person’s intentions, potentially including surveilling and affecting brain activity.
Importantly, U.S. government scientists suggested the remote detection of covert intent technologies and their planned “larger systems of systems” could have dual uses in the civilian economy, including “crowd control, antidrug and anticrime operations, border security, and ensuring the security of government and private personnel and property.”
Emphasis should be on the use of remote and secret technologies for “anticrime operations” in the previous quotation; the U.S. government suggested using remote and secret technologies which potentially affect the human brain and/or body to prevent crime, not necessarily to solve crimes already committed. (Although such a use would also be problematic; innocent persons might be deliberately wrongly investigated and investigations can cause life-destroying harm.)
In other words, such potentially remote and secret brain surveillance systems were suggested to be used by law enforcement and investigation entities like the FBI for “anticrime operations.”
Directed Energy Weapons are similar to those suggested to be used by U.S. government scientists for surveillance and anticrime operations and are also relevant to this discussion; such weapons could remotely and secretly harm the brain and body. Those technologies, according to a U.S. government publication, could cause one to “suddenly hear voices in one’s head” and mimic schizophrenia. In a moment it will be explained how such technologies might be used for “anticrime operations.”
Now, before getting to the main point, an incomplete discussion on national security and law enforcement is necessary.
One often hears government national security and local security employees say things like, “we take every threat seriously.”
Connect With Us