• DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 07:44 PM
    Electric Vehicles are the most idiotic thing I have heard yet. Especially when they first announced them, next actually came out with them. First things first. Produce the electricity at the POWER COMPANY. Either by Coal or Nuclear. Yeah, thats WAY better for the environment. Next, about HALF your electricity is lost in transmission over the power lines. Next, it is NOT SELF SUFFICIENT. IE no recharge panels on the car itself. Then they keep using Friction Brakes. Electric Cars are WORSE for the environment than even Gas Guzzlers. Why? Why not just make it mandatory to have it ALL NUCLEAR POWER?
    12 replies | 140 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 07:26 PM
    I doubt anyone will answer you, except in sarcasm. You are Gaslighting in your questioning. If I were to ask "why didnt you do something about the Corporate World Government Takeover", that would effectively be a Gaslighting question, and we all know it and quite frankly are sick of your bullshit.
    21 replies | 148 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 07:23 PM
    Agree and slightly disagree. One upside is we are not required to use real names. Downside is lack of HTTPS, which can be gotten for Free with Certbot by EFF. Due to that, when we create accounts or login with an Email, that Email can be sniffed by Man in the Middle attacks. And I am pretty sure most of the folks here use GMail anyway. Another downside is Google Analytics. Still, this site is no where nearly as dangerous as Google or Facebook or Amazon on Data Collection. One thing I know is that the majority of users, although concerned about their privacy, lack the necessary skills to do something to protect their privacy. Even shit like basics like deleting tracking cookies is getting harder and harder due to the Browsers that most people use. Chrome is by far the #1 most commonly used Browser, and Firefox is trailing in like single digits, and Chrome is by far THE MOST DANGEROUS BROWSER, ESPECIALLY when the Default Settings are to allow everyone to see everything about you by sending it ALL back to Google. So when your Social Credit Score is now based on what information Google sells to your Financial Institutions (without compensation I might add), dont complain to me. Still, here, there is room for improvement.
    47 replies | 1114 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:41 PM
    Sorry Comrade! Thank you for the kind unbad correction to my abhorrent thinking!
    8 replies | 139 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:38 PM
    Right back at it. No the Thread Title does NOT state the Facts.
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:27 PM
    Stating something that has not been determined in a COURT OF LAW as OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. They would have originally made the statement because they BELIEVE the statement they made to be true, and were coerced into redaction. It is NOT FACT. Look, I believe that YOU believe Trump lost, and there is no election fraud. And you can believe that. You can even express those beliefs all you want. But now youre basically demanding that "False Claims" are Objective in their nature and we must change ourselves to suit your view of the world. You are twisting information to suit your narrative. That is called BIAS. And exactly WHY we have such a problem with MSM. Youre merely repeating what the MSM has said because you believe it. Fine if you believe it but it does not make it Objective or True. The type of thinking down the road will lead you to want to pass laws to censor us, but it will backfire on you and you wont be given permission to speak either. If this was Twitter, everyone who has expressed doubt in you would already be banned and ONLY YOU would remain. Fortunately for all of us we have some great Moderators here, and they are not about to ban us. Kind of like the Fact Checkers ONLY "Fact Checking" those expressing Conservative views, but anyone on the Left gets a Free Pass. And for the record, "Fact Check" just means they googled something, which, again does NOT make it true. I am not sure that you understand the difference between Objective and Subjective.
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    8 replies | 139 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:12 PM
    Again BULLSHIT. You can NOT use the phrasing of a Title as evidence that there is no election fraud. -REP
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:04 PM
    OMG Dominion sues Rudy Giuliani therefore Giuliani MUST BE LYING! Rudy Giuliani Sued by Dominion Voting Systems For Defamation https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/rudy-giuliani-sued-by-dominion-voting-systems-for-defamation See? Since they are suing then there can not be ANY election fraud!
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:59 PM
    Bullshit. "American Thinker Statement Retracting False Claims about Dominion" The difference between False and Not False is subjective. The thread title is presented as Objective, as if it is Fact and Evidence. I believe Trump WON the election. And I believe there IS massive election fraud.
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:44 PM
    One other thing that needs to be pointed out is Correlation does NOT mean Causation. Here is an example of how that can go wrong. Statistically crime is much higher in summer than winter. Also, ice cream sales are much higher in summer than winter. Thus, Ice Cream CAUSES Crime. That is associating Correlation and Causation. Same thing as a Correlation is being manufactured between Republican / Libertarian / Christian / Conservative and Terrorist. The two terms are not mutually exclusive. The Title of the thread is using that Correlation as Causation. This is akin to using the number of people that believe that there is Election Fraud as evidence. They are pissed, I believe they do believe, but it is NOT evidence. With the Title of this thread, the Correlation is that American Journal withdrew their statement as evidence. It is not evidence, they simply redacted their statement because it was challenged, but does not mean that the statements were in fact "False". Period.
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:08 PM
    Its a setup. When the vaccines start killing people en masse, the plan is going to be to blame it on some new strain of COVID. Thing is, I think there very well may be a very dangerous bioweapon that is planned to be deployed, but it sure as fuck aint COVID. COVID is just an excuse to deprive the people of their property and ability to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. ... which are now words of Terrorists.
    8 replies | 217 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:06 PM
    Far too often the difference between true and false is subjective. It very much sounds like what you may be insinuating is that people should not have ANY RIGHT to speak, instead, make it a PERMISSION that is ONLY GRANTED if the individual will express statements that are in line with "official narrative". And THAT is DANGEROUS. Guess what. I make mistakes. I own them. I learn from them. And I look at those "mistakes" as an "opportunity to learn". Thus, if I am not making mistakes at something, then I am not trying. The current narrative does not allow for ANYONE to make a mistake, or to change their minds. Also HIGHLY DANGEROUS and ONE SIDED NARRATIVE. Guess what else. I express beliefs that I DO NOT AGREE with quite frequently. Its not necessarily about ONLY BEING PERMITTED to express things that "I agree with" because what I am trying to do is express a train of thought and how I arrive at certain conclusions. And I dont think there is ANYTHING MALICIOUS about that. Nor do I think American Journals words are MALICIOUS by any reasonable interpretation. Now, would you hold the same point of view if instead of it being American Journal it was a Petty Criminal and Known Liar? The "damage" is only done to themselves. So by all means I would allow them to continue expressing themselves as much as they want. Many people believe that everyone else does not challenge information that is presented to them. I said "cats are tasty", which implies that I have eaten a cat. I have not. Well thats a good expression of something I dont agree with. But more importantly I do not believe that everyone that reads that statement will accept it without challenge. Thats what idiots do. "I told that cop I did not eat no chocolate cake" while having a face covered in chocolate. Its childish, immature, and shows an inability to recognize that other people have intelligence enough challenge information.
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 12:24 PM
    Even if they are flat out WRONG, they still have a Constitutional RIGHT to express their Beliefs. Freedom comes in two parts, the Freedom to do what you want, and the Freedom to do what you ought. What we OUGHT to do is protect the Right of the People to express beliefs than we do NOT agree with, rather than ONLY those which support an "official narrative". That means you are just as protected, and we can disagree, and STILL get along just fine because we will agree on MANY other things. The thing is, the Popular thing to say will NEVER need to be afforded the Protections of the 1st Amendment. The 1st Amendment exists to protect the Unpopular thing to say. And right now on this topic, the Unpopular thing depends on who you ask and where you are. Unpopular here means "the election was not stolen" but I still have to take the higher road and DEFEND your Right to express that belief. The Unpopular thing pretty much country wide is still that "the election was not stolen". But, the Unpopular thing as far as Media (not all journalists are MSM, like Ben Swann) is "the election was stolen". The 1st Amendment exists so we ALL have the right (notice how that is inclusive of EVERYONE without regard to race color or gender?) to express our beliefs. Now, in a court of law, we also have Innocent Until Proven Guilty. So is American Journal Guilty of expressing incorrect information? Not until it is PROVEN in a Court of Law. Until it is PROVEN, to me, it is simply a Belief, which does allow room for errors and lets me and everyone else change their minds. Which would you prefer? A one sided narrative, or expression of beliefs that differ by everyone equally?
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 12:02 PM
    Dont believe ANYTHING that ANYONE says to be true. Even things that I say. Do some actual research and not just "Fact Check" which mostly means "ask Google", I mean to get your own hands on the ACTUAL EVIDENCE or as close as you can. That is the difference between BELIEVING and KNOWING. I believe, but I do not KNOW. I think it is worth while to have someone with integrity examine the EVIDENCE, the same EVIDENCE that has NOT BEEN EXAMINED and is thrown out "for other reasons" other than being not true. Peoples Belief Systems can shift quickly, but what I always think is funny is how hard they will fight to protect those beliefs, even if those beliefs are not true. The ability to change their mind lets a person be a bit more mentally flexible where by they can change their minds, which really allows them to decide what kind of person they want to be, and not defined by Identity Politics. Mind if I ask you something else? Are you happy with who you are? Not so much what other people think of you, but by yourself, left to your own devices and decisions, are you happy? What if you could "just choose" to be happy? What would allow you to be able to make that choice?
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:56 AM
    Well, I do think Dominion is guilty of Election Fraud. I have seen enough evidence, as well as understanding that they have motive and opportunity. I will maintain that redaction does not mean that the fraud did or did not take place. That really is something that needs to be determined in a court of law where the evidence is examined. There is a problem tho. If the PRESIDENT OF THE FUCKING UNITED STATES can not get SUPREME COURT JUDGES to examine the evidence, which has been dismissed on "technicalities" and not "interpretation of evidence presented", how the hell could a tiny online website publisher have a snowballs chance of a FAIR TRIAL IN COURT? This would be the most politically influenced legal case in history, and they would lose. Not because there is no evidence, but because the JUDGE HAS BEEN COMPROMISED. I suppose a good analogy would be a guy swimming with little rubber ducky arm floaties having the ENTIRE US NAVY POINT THEIR BIGGEST WEAPONS against him. What is that guy gonna do? Spit water at them? I believe that the American Journal was INTIMIDATED into redacting their statements.
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:50 AM
    Perhaps "Double Think"? Let them understand what the definition of Double Think is. Two types of incorrect thinking that usually mirror each other. Cognitive Dissonance, and Double Think. Cognitive Dissonance is a conflict in the mind between two conflicting ideas. "I want to buy my kid the cool shoes but I cant afford it. Which do I do?" Double Think is kind of the OPPOSITE of Cognitive Dissonance, where two ideas that should conflict exist in the mind, but do not conflict because they have not been compared. "Republicans are Pro Life but Pro War", vs "Democrats are Pro Abortion and Anti War". The idea to focus on there is that an individuals chosen party "protects the sanctity of life". Really, BOTH support DEATH, Republicans by War, and Democrats by Abortion. Both worship DEATH. Same people pulling strings on both sides. One of the things they do that paralyzes people mentally is to CONFUSE people. They achieve this by trying to to confuse as many people as they can. MSM does this all the time, where in a debate, if they can not win based on FACTS, they try to CONFUSE their opponent with Cognitive Dissonance and Double Think. The only way that people can overcome their confused types of thinking REQUIRES that first it is identified and explained to them.
    19 replies | 464 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:40 AM
    Of course they do. What they claim is not always truth. What do you think? Was the election taken in a Fraudslide? Are they innocent or guilty of Election Rigging? Is the retraction the right move for American Thinker?
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:37 AM
    Well yeah! If you helped to take a major part in a Political Coup, you would not only be compensated quite well, you would also have an ARMY OF LAWYERS ready to defend the lie. No small publisher would be able to defend themselves in court against this. The retraction is more of a Legal Move of not making themselves a target than to say they presented information that "is not true". Not too many actually KNOW if the election was stolen based on HANDS ON EVIDENCE. Many of us have seen the RESULTS and can easily conclude the "facts do not add up", and have seen a very small HANDFUL of the evidence of Election Fraud.
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:33 AM
    MSM IS STILL A MAJOR THREAT I need to place a high level of importance on that statement because we are guilty of PROJECTION. We project our own intelligence onto anyone who listens to the MSM as being able to recognize and dismiss the Disinformation they present. Not everyone is susceptible to their tactics. And we project our own immunity onto everyone else. There is the problem. Although a LOT of people may no longer trust MSM, many dont fully understand WHY. We need to keep at this, and make sure EVERYONE knows that what the MSM is doing is RADICALIZING the people that ARE SUSCEPTIBLE to their BRAINWASHING. That is ONE of the things they have done to create Antifa and other Violent Extremist Groups. Its really the only way we keep ourselves from fighting with the people that are being turned into extremists. I'd say the "Left have Infiltrated" many positions of power. I dont necessarily think that is what happened tho. I think they were once totally normal people, got their jobs, then were BRAINWASHED. Then, due to the BRAINWASHING, started going along with their policies and partaking in exclusion of any and all Conservatives as "doing good". There are TWO major factors in Brainwashing that need to be addressed right now. There are actually about 12 Steps for Brainwashing, but lets focus on just TWO for the moment, ones that we can do something about. First. Brainwashing of Cults typically requires "cutting people off from natural social support structures". This is partly what COVID Lockdowns have done. When they are "cut off" they are gonna have "weak moments" where they are susceptible to their lies. Bla bla a bunch of Emotional Manipulation, but the Emotions are also a part of your Natural Defense Mechanisms. So, dont give up and continue to try to educate these people on LOGICAL conclusions. Brainwashing is Emotional, Freedom will always be Logical because no matter how you feel about facts, the facts remain true.
    19 replies | 464 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:20 AM
    They tried to use Trump to their advantage as a Distraction while they try to get away with their real evil shit. These people are so fucked up they dont even understand what they are doing is EVIL.
    2 replies | 158 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:18 AM
    The pattern of "needing to be fact checked" is only for those who are not on the far left. Reason for this is that the people on the left are morons. People on the right do not need a "fact checker" to know something is not true. Like now they are saying a few weeks after Hank Aaron took the vaccine, then died, exactly within their window of reactions, "we dont know why he died". These are the same people that ask questions "What is the biggest planet on Earth" or remember "when Mount Saint Rushmore erupted" or think "Gulf of New Mexico is REAL because we have Arizona Bay" and well, they dont know how to tie their own shoes. The left followers need fact checkers because they are IDIOTS.
    8 replies | 139 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:13 AM
    Control is one of the items on their list. I seriously think the real goal is to KILL a cubic fuckload of people, and have solid control of those who are left AFTER sterilizing them.
    8 replies | 217 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 11:09 AM
    Ron Paul: Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies...
    99 replies | 562 view(s)
  • Swordsmyth's Avatar
    Today, 03:32 AM
    The CEO United Airlines said companies should require employees to get vaccinated for COVID-19, according to a transcript of a Thursday townhall with company employees provided to the Daily Caller News Foundation. The airline is considering a vaccine mandate for employees, but there are “logistical challenges that we need to work through” before that happens, a company spokesman told the DCNF. “I think the right thing to do is for United Airlines, and for other companies, to require the vaccines and to make them mandatory,” United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby said in the townhall, according to the transcript. Kirby said the company has to overcome “logistical challenges” for the endeavor, according to the transcript. The company also noted that Kirby disclosed the information to the company’s workers “in the interest of transparency.” The CEO said he doesn’t think the company will be alone in mandating employee vaccinations.
    756 replies | 45439 view(s)
  • Swordsmyth's Avatar
    Today, 03:28 AM
    Giving the other side something they think has value but really doesn't is getting a great deal and that is what Trump did. Republicans thought Bolton as NSA was valuable to them and they saw value in not overriding the vetoes of a popular president from their own party. Rand gets nothing from anyone for his confirmations votes. And Rand has stated that a POTUS has a right to have his appointments confirmed, Trump never said Congress had a right to not be vetoed, he used veto threats to get things he wanted and he also issued vetoes.
    54 replies | 1511 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 12:13 AM
    Mayday, yeah, no kidding! Oooh oooh while we are just farting in the wind and calling it snow, how about we celebrate Feburary 32nd! Y'all heard that right! I hear bye declair that Febyouairy 32rd is now a Intergalactic Intercosmic Intersexual(?) Holladay!
    23 replies | 550 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 12:11 AM
    https://www.brighteon.com/ce080dbb-bb67-44ed-9314-aee3964d49d1 I dont think I can embed it. Please let me know if this site has popups or excessive ads. Im trying to find decent sources other than Youtube or MSM controlled network video sources that arent so ad heavy they are unwatchable. Back on topic. Yeah. How about that! Its a MIRACLE! G.I. Joe Biden has saved us! (G.I. stands for Geriatric Institutionalized, is that funny? Not sure if making fun of his obvious mental disabilities is a Hate Crime or not yet...)
    8 replies | 217 view(s)
More Activity

4 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Thank you
  2. View Conversation
    Don’t have my phone so not sure if you have tried contacting me on the other site!
  3. View Conversation
    Sounds good!
  4. View Conversation
    ...
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 4 of 4
About Swordsmyth

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):
1
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Signature


Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

Robert Heinlein

Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

Groucho Marx

I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

Linus, from the Peanuts comic

You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

Alexis de Torqueville

Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

A Zero Hedge comment

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
64,324
Posts Per Day
36.80
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
4
Most Recent Message
08-27-2020 08:58 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 04:05 AM
Join Date
04-14-2016
Referrals
2

8 Friends

  1. ATruepatriot ATruepatriot is offline

    Member

    ATruepatriot
  2. Beenhere Beenhere is offline

    Member

    Beenhere
  3. DamianTV DamianTV is online now

    Member

    DamianTV
  4. lilymc lilymc is offline

    Member

    lilymc
  5. merkelstan merkelstan is offline

    Member

    merkelstan
  6. PursuePeace PursuePeace is offline

    Member

    PursuePeace
  7. Qdog Qdog is offline

    Member

    Qdog
  8. Sammy Sammy is offline

    Member

    Sammy
Showing Friends 1 to 8 of 8
Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast

01-22-2021


01-20-2021


01-12-2021

  • 08:16 PM - Hidden
  • 08:01 PM - Hidden

01-09-2021


01-05-2021


01-04-2021


12-24-2020


12-22-2020


12-10-2020


12-09-2020


12-08-2020


12-07-2020


12-06-2020



Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast

08-14-2020


02-23-2020


02-21-2020


08-30-2019

  • 10:57 PM - Hidden

09-05-2017



01-25-2021


01-24-2021


01-23-2021