Tab Content
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 08:36 AM
    All you claim may in fact prove out, but only time will tell. So my question to you then is what would you see done? And here I ask not for pie in the sky things that were never going to happen, but actual things that one could do in the real world. Take up arms and start shooting? Say "fuck it, get me a beer woman" and sit and do nothing as you wait either for someone else to make things all better? The sorts of change we need in the context of an environment of unbridled tyranny cannot be had along "normal" avenues. So what, then, do we DO?
    5 replies | 257 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:54 AM
    And what does all this reveal? We are at war, literally. We are, and have been, in a civil war for decades. It is not a hot war. It is our own domestic roll of cold warfare, yet so few have been able to see it. It has only been since 9/11 that this truth has been coming progressively more apparent. Why Theye have chosen to reveal themselves, who can say? Seems a gross miscalculation to me. Perhaps Theye thought we'd been so thoroughly marinated in fear that we would do their bidding no matter what it might be? Or are Theye not really on the ropes as it now appears? We must bear in mind that while Theye do not likely have their hands directly on the silo captains' hands, they most likely have them on the hands of those who work in places like the Wuhan bioweapons facility. I would not be too fast to cheer Trump's reascension... not just yet. Time will tell. Foists of apocalyptic "if we can't have it, nobody can" plagues upon the world aside, we nonetheless are far from recovered from the ravages of the globalist cabal. The comments of that rageshrieking Democrat dreg the other day about being at war is actually true, only not in the sense she meant it. If you look at the major political movements of the past 100+ years through the lens of Quiet Wars†, everything begins to come into sensible focus. This is why though very wary of Trump's current wave of measures, I nonetheless welcome them in any event because up until now we've been doing the same political things over and over, decade over decade expecting different results. Given the direction in which things have been going, especially these past four years, we no longer have that much to lose, except our cheap and petty comforts and conveniences, given how whittled down as our rights and freedoms have become. I say throw the dice, come what may. Let us have courage for once and act like men. Nothing is worse than sitting in that pot as the water grows ever warmer.
    5 replies | 257 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:28 AM
    osan started a thread AI Forum? in Science & Technology
    Barring a return to the stone age due to social collapse, due in its turn to human Stupid, AI is here to stay and should have its own forum. I've now had hundreds of "conversations" with various AIs. There is much to discuss.
    0 replies | 21 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:17 AM
    Oh no... a Democrat....
    2 replies | 53 view(s)
  • Origanalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:03 AM
    Ya, nobody believes your cult is anything more than it is, mental illness. Your brief moment is over, stay away from the kids if you want to live out your miserable existence. Or not.
    465 replies | 62185 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 03:38 AM
    Words are important. They are the most important things in our lives, believe it or not. Therefore, our choices of wording is perforce important, and to that point I would turn your attention toward that which has come to be known as the Non-Aggression Principle, AKA the "NAP". While the spirit of the NAP is righteous, the choice of "aggression" in the moniker is quite unfortunate. It states that the initiation of aggression is always a bad thing, but fails to what constitutes "aggression". Because of this, I have witnessed endless examples of gross misunderstanding of "aggression", more specifically its initiation, such that some of those cases tap dance right past the absurd. Words are important. Therefore, and because the term "aggression" seems to evade far too many in terms of a sufficiently precise meaning, I suggest leaving that term in the rear view mirror in favor of "transgression". Transgression is always incorrect as a matter of definition, whereas aggression is not. It is the fact of the latter that we run into the problem of semantics. Let us illustrate with an example. Johnny tells Janey he is going "let her have it". Is that aggression? There are those who say that it is, and those who deny it with some nontrivial vehemence. This is the key of the problem. As for my view and taken all else equal, Janey stands well within her right to self-defense to take whatever measures she sees fit to remove what we may conversationally take as a threat to her welfare. If she walks away, fine. Kick Johnny in the balls? OK, if imprudent in practical terms. Draw a sidearm and drill him a deep fathom down? You bet. And yet there are those who would argue that any such physical action against Johnny would constitute an initiation of aggression, whereas his ravings would not. Forgetting that this is sheer stupidity, prima facie, we can at least state as a fact that the difference of opinion exists. Counter example: siblings have their moments. Janey irritates Johnny in some manner and Johnny blithely lets her know "I'm going to murder you". Kids say the darnedest things. In all good likelihood Johnny was not to be taken literally, and to Janey's retrieval of dad's 686 revolver, whereby she holds Johnny at bay until police arrive is probably not justified. And yet, Johnny uttered words that under differing circumstances might justly see him interred. Words are important, but so is context.
    2 replies | 53 view(s)
  • Origanalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:03 PM
    Anybody buying this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pjd_TzIwvw
    46 replies | 3704 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 PM
    And that sort of outcome in a nation such as America manifest as a result of the failure of its people to be the government. When people pawn off their responsibility to be part of the governance of the nation, choosing to trust strangers with their freedoms, they effectively take to their knees in supplication to evil men to rape their rights in every orifice. We are the reason everything is shitty. We failed ourselves, our fellows, our children, and so on by not being the smartest, morally soundest, and most involved we can be for the sakes of all Americans. To defend your rights is to defend my own.
    8 replies | 431 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:15 PM
    Mr. Rock, meet Mr. Hardplace. The problems here are manifold, but the essence of the root problem is that the nature of all American "government" has degenerated to such a degree that we can no longer rely on the so-called "system" to correct itself via the instrumentalities intended for such purposes. This has arisen largely due to the fact that the American people are not united in the fundamentals of what it is to be American. The schism between "left" and "right, "conservative" and "progressive" is so deeply radical, we see these yawning chasms between what Republican and Democrat agents of "government" want and do in terms of policy and the passage of legislation. Herein we see a very profound flaw in the architecture of "government" in America. Furthermore, the mission of the federal government has experienced vast scope creep. The intent of the Constitution was to limit the fedgov to a precious few tasks including the common defense and courts. That's it. But perversions of the Constitution have lead to welfare states, regulatory empire, promotional empire, military empire, and so on down a dreary list of powers that have been assumed in gross violation of the metes, bounds, and intent of our foundational document. Governmentally speaking, as things currently stand America is a failed nation. As such we are faced with the choice of how to proceed. We could allow things to continue as they have been for the past 150 years and more, or we could decide to make corrections. If we choose the latter, as is apparent with the reelection of Trump for a second term, then we face the question of how to proceed. Given our current state of political reality, it is quite unlikely that there exists any meaningful possibility for making the necessary adjustments working within the normal delimiters of the system. That is because the system is so very broken. This fact then narrows our choices to "do nothing" and "take extraordinary measures". The latter carries huge risk, but is the only way that holds any reasonable chances of succeeding. And so we can wring our hands and do nothing because of the grave risks associated with extraordinary action, in which case we as a nation are as good as dead, or we can take extraordinary action, and bear the risks like men rather as shrinking violets. The worst that can happen in the latter case is that we meet with failure and are doomed the same as in the case where we default. The fact that the extraordinary measures being taken by Trump are, for many, very scary is good. Not only should they be scary, they should be terrifying for everyone. It has been our collective failure to BE the "government" which has lead to our currently atrocious circumstance. Let it linger in the hearts of all that we don't ever allow ourselves to fail ourselves again.
    5 replies | 257 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    7 replies | 164 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 10:02 PM
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 09:49 PM
    https://x.com/ComicDaveSmith/status/1886887002106429701
    30 replies | 2033 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 09:39 PM
    “I think our reverence for the truth might have become a bit of a distraction that is preventing us from finding consensus and getting important things done.” -- Katherine Maher (NPR CEO) https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1886819166969323768 1886819166969323768
    47 replies | 3614 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 09:30 PM
    THREAD: The FAA's Hiring Scandal: A Quick Overview An Air Traffic Control Nightmare
    91 replies | 3232 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 09:29 PM
    The FAA REFUSED To Hire Qualified Whites https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSsMuAusVJ8 {Actual Justice Warrior | 03 January 2025} In this video, I discuss an Obama era program at the FAA that actively discriminated against white applicants at the command of The National Black Coalition of Federal Aviation Employees according to a lawsuit. Sources: Lawsuit: https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/brigida-v-buttigieg-no-899911822 Article On Lawsuit: https://dailycaller.com/2018/06/13/black-union-lobbied-for-new-air-traffic-test/
    5 replies | 487 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 09:18 PM
    Corrupt "Super Mayor" Gives CRAZY Interview After Brawl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=209JmxDiiRY {Actual Justice Warrior | 03 February 2025} In this video, I discuss a ridiculous interview that the Super Mayor gave to the local news where she denied responsibility for EVERYTHING. Sources: Full Super Mayor Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLklYRErBEt_fh66U6iIlakqVGYz1cHanx Local News Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BZ5k1cvMvg Angle 1: https://www.youtube.com/live/iyFg_kruLsk?t=6469s
    112 replies | 20139 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 09:18 PM
    Super Mayor Responds To The Brawl & Lightfoot's Report https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Wv0gGmoKJI {Nate The Lawyer | 03 February 2025}
    112 replies | 20139 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 09:05 PM
    //
    26 replies | 408 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    783 replies | 90039 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 08:44 PM
    "'My kids are trans, my sisters kids are trans, every kid I know is trans…' What are the odds that she’s normal and we are all crazy?" -- Scarlett Johnson https://x.com/ScooterCasterNY/status/1886579789001380307 1886579789001380307
    23 replies | 833 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 08:29 PM
    The wise man didn't say that about borders - he said it about border walls. He actually seems to like borders - and maybe even using troops to secure them. FTA (bold emphasis added): https://ontheissues.org/tx/Ron_Paul_Immigration.htm Pay attention to US borders, not international borders Q: Why are you opposed to a system that requires employers to verify the immigration status of their workers?
    82 replies | 8009 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 07:32 PM
    Well, it's true, after all - for some definition of "white supremacy" and "most violent crime".
    3163 replies | 441101 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 07:19 PM
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iijs0iS3_ZM
    25 replies | 562 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 06:57 PM
    That just makes it sound even more reasonable. "GITMO 1" involved the imprisonment of subjects who had not been convicted (or even charged) with any crimes. Whatever one thinks of Bukele's offer, it is explicitly restricted to "only convicted criminals". So unless every other prison is "GTIMO", neither is this one.
    25 replies | 562 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 06:44 PM
    There is value in going through these motions, even if they do not come directly to immediate fruition. The idea and prospect of doing things come before the doing of them. If they are ever to happen at all, then the idea and prospect of doing them are going to need greater social visibility, currency, and validation. Seeds are being planted - whether Trump (or his successor) is able (or even willing) to follow through or not. And even the failure of those seeds to grow and bear fruit may produce further reaction.
    16 replies | 442 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    02-04-2025, 06:12 PM
    Sadly, it's not an "either-or" proposition. A government with the capacity to do the one kind of thing is ipso facto going to have the capacity to do the other kind of thing. So we invariably tend to end up with "both-and".
    8 replies | 431 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    02-03-2025, 09:16 PM
    Point of order: shut it down, THEN audit. Then arrest, charge, try, convict, and imprison for life with no chance of pardon or parole all who violated the Public Trust. The time for tyranny to die is here, the only question remaining being whether we actually kill it.
    8 replies | 431 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    I don't know what is wrong with the rep system that you get three neg reps and I'm only allowed to give you one. But Hillary didn't lie about her client nor did she say he was guilty of first degree rape. She said that was the charge. I did watch it and you lied. Further he didn't "get off." He plead guilty to a lesser charge. What Hillary said was "I got him off WITH TIME SERVED." He's still on the sex abuse registry the rest of his life. You have not identified a single legitimate ethical lapse in anything Hillary did or said in that video.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
6,163
Posts Per Day
1.86
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
10-13-2016 05:33 PM
General Information
Last Activity
01-31-2021 04:10 AM
Join Date
01-09-2016
Referrals
0

18 Friends

  1. AuH20 AuH20 is offline

    Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing

    AuH20
  2. DamianTV DamianTV is offline

    Member

    DamianTV
  3. Danke Danke is offline

    Top Rated Influencer

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
    Danke
  4. Ender Ender is offline

    Member

    Ender
  5. goldenequity goldenequity is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to goldenequity
    goldenequity
  6. Lamp Lamp is offline

    Member

    Lamp
  7. lilymc lilymc is offline

    Member

    lilymc
  8. Lucille Lucille is offline

    Member

    Lucille
  9. Occam's Banana Occam's Banana is offline

    Moderator

    Occam's Banana
  10. Origanalist Origanalist is offline

    Member

    Origanalist
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 18
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

05-04-2019


04-15-2019


04-01-2019


01-30-2019


11-22-2018


10-13-2018


10-03-2018


09-03-2018


04-06-2018


03-29-2018


03-17-2018


03-07-2018


03-06-2018


11-08-2017


11-07-2017


07-28-2017


07-25-2017


04-23-2017

  • 05:36 PM - Hidden


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 86 1231151 ... LastLast

05-08-2022

  • 06:09 AM - Deleted Posts

09-09-2020


05-14-2020


04-22-2020


03-28-2020


03-27-2020


03-26-2020


03-25-2020


07-21-2019


06-26-2019



Page 1 of 86 1231151 ... LastLast