Tab Content
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 05:32 PM
    I am not sure if that is a good idea because it replaces one system of brainwashing with another, and both achieve the exact same thing, fixed habits of reaction to any figure of authority. I think his best chance is to eliminate the instruction of others, including either of us, and do it for himself.
    4 replies | 47 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 05:29 PM
    The promise of technology haven't been collectively earned and that's why it is so dangerous. A sizable swath of the general public possesses a rudimentary reading level, despite being addicted to the hypnotic glow of their smart phones. Zombies like this will never be receptive to the call of property rights or the non aggression principle. Their time is up, but they don't know it yet.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 05:00 PM
    First of all, understand that you need to have Many Goals, not just ones that suit what you want. That is usually the hardest thing to do as a parent. The way that many of the lessons that achieve the goals is often very counter intuitive, and will go completely against your instincts as a parent. Thats the basic idea of Reverse Psychology, but when that label is not clearly understood, efforts to try to apply reverse psychology can easily backfire. I am sure that you dont want to see your kid fail at all. Most parents dont. But, at the same time, most parents set their kids up to fail because they have become over protective and not letting the children learn how to cope with failures. It is one of the most important lessons any person can learn in life. Its also why there are theories out there that say that the A Student often works for the C Student. The reason for that is the C Student is used to things not working out perfectly, and having the tenacity to continue working towards a solution, while the A Student simply shuts down if things dont work out perfectly for them immediately. One critically important factor is that you have to REJECT THE GRADES OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS. I cant emphasize this enough. Everyone one is good at something. And not everyone is interested, or good at the things we are expected to be good at. Imagine yourself in school. You fail an Art class. Then you go home to your parents, and they tell you "its okay, not everyone is good at drawing or art". What that teaches is that Art itself as a focus is useless, and the level of interest you have is irrelevant because the demands of society comes first. Now, imagine you come home from school. Not your kid, but YOU. YOU failed math. You simply did not understand. You get your ass handed to you because it is considered a fundamental skill that you must excel at. The psychological consequences of this type of judgement are tremendous. It starts with creating a sense of self doubt which later leads to other major problems such as emotional dependency on authority as well as teaching that everything is hard. If you need to see the results of making children feel shame or guilt for getting poor grades in emphasized subjects, just look at the Youth of America today. Do you think they have any self esteem what so ever? Any confidence? Any ambition? A few do, but not enough to place the US as even a decent place to live any more. The Grades that your kid receives from ANY Public School MUST be taken into context of the School. Did your kid fail in school, or did School itself fail your kids? Now, your kid is good at something. And not just at texting or posting selfies. But there are other hidden dormant underlying and often undiscovered skills your kid is probably an absolute genius at. Those are what need to be found and encouraged because of the secondary lesson of "if you are good at this, what else are you good at"? That type of encouragement builds Self Esteem, Self Worth and maintains a Healthy Interest in many areas they could potentially be great at. If you only focus on the bad stuff and only what the Professionals tell you, then you are setting your kid up for failure and teaching them to undermine any Self Reliance. Fish are great at swimming. But if you teach a Fish that it is stupid based on its ability to climb a tree, then the Fish will grow up and believe it is a worthless piece of shit for the rest of its life. And that is exactly what Public School does. Your job as a parent is to offer as much incentive which turns your child into a confident and self reliant person. It is hard enough to do that, but, now that you know you have to resist the urge to accept the passing judgement of a system that sets your kid up for failure, you have twice as much work to do. We are always told to "think before we speak". That holds true even as adults. If you punish a kid for disobedience, what is the...
    4 replies | 47 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    0 replies | 27 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Today, 03:52 PM
    No, a commie would never defend a socialist...:rolleyes: They do like to divide and conquer.
    6 replies | 135 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    41 replies | 416 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 03:45 PM
    Can you figure a way to provide "modernity" with far less government? Regardless our fine government will see to it that our collectively cushy lifestyle ends before long what with pissing off folks from all corners of the globe. Somebody will manage to strike a resounding blow, probably sooner than later, whether it's biological or to the power grid, life will tend to be far from cushy...
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 03:35 PM
    lol. Your scenario has nothing to do with the studies. I will take the word of numerous doctors and researchers who have conducted long-term studies, over the word of a guy on the Internet who is clearly the biggest fan of Keto to ever walk the face of the earth. :p
    11 replies | 133 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 03:28 PM
    Another one for you. This was a study done in China. Meat consumption is associated with risk for developing type 2 diabetes, according to a new study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology. Researchers followed the diets and disease risk of 63,257 participants from the Singapore Chinese Health Study and found that those who consumed the most red meat (e.g., pork, beef, lamb), poultry, and fish had an increased risk for type 2 diabetes by 23, 15, and 7 percent, respectively, compared with those who consumed the least. In a separate analysis, the authors found that as heme iron increased, so did the risk for diabetes. Other studies have published similar findings, including the Adventist Health Study-2, which showed that as more animal products, such as red meat and fish, are included in the diet, increase for diabetes risk follows.
    11 replies | 133 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:22 PM If a Real Crime has been committed, then getting a warrant should not ever be an issue, right?
    2 replies | 32 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:20 PM Not every device in your house needs a fucking internet camera.
    0 replies | 31 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:18 PM I feel safer already.
    0 replies | 28 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:17 PM
    As usual, what could possibly go wrong? :rolleyes:
    47 replies | 682 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 03:16 PM
    That wasn't the claim. At least from what I heard. The claim was that there was an increased risk of diabetes, as the level of animal products increases. And I've heard that before, from a number of sources. Here is a study: "Meat consumption is consistently associated with diabetes risk." Here's something else to look at: And this: An excerpt:
    11 replies | 133 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 03:16 PM I will let everyone else reply before posting an opinion. Also, yes, in the Family, Parenting, and Education thread because Education.
    0 replies | 19 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 03:12 PM
    Trump can't save the ship. It's going down no matter what. But he can prepare people for the inevitable. His interactions with the corrupt press illuminate the true face of our society and it's not pretty.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 01:59 PM
    Abso-fucking-lutely! Gotta thin the herd somehow might as well feed the combatants politician livers before battle.....
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 01:51 PM
    Until the environmental factors change, I don't think we will see any tangible form of liberty. We need to get back to basics first and the cycle must begin anew. Experience builds principles and then the benefits follow. The current population is largely incapable of becoming what many of this site desire to be. It's not going to happen.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 12:59 PM
    When the elite parasites will finally have some skin in the game, things will change for the better. Right now, we're on autopilot into 1984. Bring social interaction down to it's brutal, most unforgiving form and civilization will gradually return. If people literally break their backs to feed and defend themselves in the future, they won't be so willing to give away such fruits away to some governmental entity. Scarcity and fear makes for hard, independent people.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 12:19 PM
    As everyday passes, they get stronger and we get weaker. Technology is becoming more advanced, yet IQ levels are dropping. We need a massive reality based event to throw the game board on it's back.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 11:40 AM
    11 replies | 133 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 09:52 AM
    Liberty on a larger scale doesn't appear often in human populations. It's an anomaly and even less likely to manifest in heterogeneous societies, since there is a missing trust factor. In a perfect world, there would be a relatively balanced table of nations, ethnically distinct from each other, but instead we have this dominant, polyglot 'authoritarian based' model, derived from the writings of Cecil Rhodes.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • William Tell's Avatar
    8 replies | 130 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 09:24 AM
    'The man behind the curtain' is utilizing displaced peoples to cement their next phase for human domination. Under the guise of mass democracy and social justice, the technological shackles will be further unveiled. That is the endgame because the domestic population is not debasing itself fast enough for their liking. A demographic shift increases the speed of the transformation.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 08:29 AM
    If physical interaction with migrants is deemed as inhuman, what other options are there? A menacing, physical barrier is the only choice because the benefits will never be repealed.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 08:25 AM
    I am of the opinion that the West must be purged, before it can be survive. We need purification and renewal. A reset. The freaks enabled by the media entertainment complex need to fulfill their life's mission and die as quickly as possible.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • AuH20's Avatar
    Today, 08:02 AM
    Survive from what? They are living in a carefully manipulated dream. We have idiots walking around with the notion that 'racism' and 'sexism' are the greatest threat.
    37 replies | 343 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Today, 07:14 AM
    Danke replied to a thread Back in the wind. in Open Discussion
    When AF pulls into foreign ports, his buddies come to greet him.
    403 replies | 11299 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    64 replies | 861 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:16 PM
    Danke replied to a thread Danke, do something in Open Discussion
    I look forward to having the Byrd Cookie Company Maple Wafer over those stupid Dutch stroopwafels.
    54 replies | 1268 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    I don't know what is wrong with the rep system that you get three neg reps and I'm only allowed to give you one. But Hillary didn't lie about her client nor did she say he was guilty of first degree rape. She said that was the charge. I did watch it and you lied. Further he didn't "get off." He plead guilty to a lesser charge. What Hillary said was "I got him off WITH TIME SERVED." He's still on the sex abuse registry the rest of his life. You have not identified a single legitimate ethical lapse in anything Hillary did or said in that video.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
10-13-2016 05:33 PM
General Information
Last Activity
05-03-2018 04:09 PM
Join Date

17 Friends

  1. AuH20 AuH20 is online now


  2. DamianTV DamianTV is online now


  3. Danke Danke is offline


    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
  4. goldenequity goldenequity is offline


    • Send a message via Skype™ to goldenequity
  5. Lamp Lamp is offline

    Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing

  6. lilymc lilymc is offline


  7. Lucille Lucille is offline


  8. Occam's Banana Occam's Banana is offline


    Occam's Banana
  9. Origanalist Origanalist is offline


  10. osan osan is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 17
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast











  • 05:36 PM - Hidden
  • 05:23 PM - Hidden



  • 12:56 PM - Deleted Posts





No results to display...
Page 1 of 66 1231151 ... LastLast











Page 1 of 66 1231151 ... LastLast