Tab Content
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Today, 09:36 AM
    The article continues here.
    1 replies | 73 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:32 AM
    No, I'm looking for a candidate who has a proven record of keeping his vows, and fidelity in marriage is one of the best ways to verify that. Sure, many people can keep their affairs secret for a little while, but in the providence of God, their affairs are usually found out, just as it has happened numerous times to politicians (such as Mark Sanford). My point to Smitty was that I don't need to delve deeply into the sexual lives of politicians in order to know whether or not they've been faithful to their vows. If a person is a habitual cheater, then that behavior has a way of surfacing itself, especially through their political duties. It's almost inevitable. But my original point still stands: if a person (like Donald Trump) cannot keep his vows to the woman he claims to love with all of his heart, then what do you think he will do to strangers as a President? What you do in your private life reflects how you behave in your public life, especially with keeping one's word.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-24-2016, 02:21 AM
    1096 replies | 55336 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-24-2016, 12:48 AM
    But what did Mark Sanford do once his affairs were made public? Did he reason, "Well, I've been advocating for smaller government in my state, so I'll stay in office, even though I was caught cheating on my wife"? No, of course not. Sanford knew that his credibility as a principled governor was shot in the public's eye, so he resigned (and rightfully so). He understood the correlation between his infidelities to his wife and the ramifications of them in holding a public office in his constituents' trust.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-23-2016, 11:06 PM
    Yes, and that metric is simply a matter of public record. We all can find out how many times a candidate has been married or when his sexual infidelities have been exposed to the public. That's all I'm touching on when I mention Trump's multiple marriages as a basis for questioning his fidelities to the American people and the States. Obviously, I can't find out every instance of sexual deviancy from a candidate, so I can only stick with information that is known in the public domain. And to that point, I can generally say that Darrell Castle's marital commitment is much better than Trump's, as evidenced here.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-23-2016, 10:57 PM
    The irony of this (to use imagery from The Dark Knight Trilogy) is that Donald Trump serves more of a role as "The Joker," to his libertarian supporters because, for them, Trump is "destroying the establishment within the GOP," thus, weakening the two-party political structure, supposedly. So, in a sense, Trump's supporters "want to watch the world burn."
    48 replies | 626 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-23-2016, 10:47 PM
    I'm in Japan right now, and I'm not planning to vote by an absentee ballot, only because the candidate I would support is not on the ticket in my state--Darrell Castle of the Constitution Party. But, of course, sexual purity is just one of the prerequisites that I look for in a candidate of my choosing.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-23-2016, 10:36 PM
    A person's sexual purity is one of the most important factors about a person's character because it deals with his deepest commitments to intimacy. While I agree with you that Washington D.C. is filled with hedonism, that's all the more reason why we need a President (or any political figure, for that matter) who does not give in to his sexual desires that violate his commitment to his spouse, just as we want him to resist the temptation to take power that he is not authorized to have by the Constitution. The two are linked. The more we ignore the truth that what a person does in his private life comes to light in his public life, the more we will continue to allow corrupt people to sit in seats of public office because those people hide themselves under empty promises and false allegiances to correct principles and policies. I'm going to be crude here and say that, on a basic, ethical level, where a person chooses to stick his dick in at night determines how he uses his pen in the daytime.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-23-2016, 10:17 PM
    The Trumpeteers in this forum will remain silent, I'm sure.
    53 replies | 901 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-23-2016, 10:13 PM
    Exactly. Generally speaking, we all look for some sort of credentials from a person before we trust them to perform a service to us, which in this case, we're investigating ethical credentials. Ethical credentials do matter, especially when a person is seeking the most prestigious office in America. If someone believes that it's okay to break sacred bonds whenever it's convenient for himself, then it's more than likely he will act on that in other areas of his life, such as in business or in civics.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-23-2016, 09:52 PM
    I would not be surprised if Donald Trump used their headlines to springboard himself as "The Dark Knight," coming to "save Gotham " from the evil, liberal villains...
    48 replies | 626 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-23-2016, 09:34 PM
    Yes, I understand that there have been Presidents who were faithful in marriage, and yet they did not uphold their oaths of office, betraying the American people and the States. But those Presidents were hypocrites. The point I'm driving at is that Donald Trump has a history of breaking his vows to love someone for all of his life, and that says a lot about himself as a person. If he were elected, then it would make sense for him to not be faithful to his oath because he has done that throughout his life with people who were supposed to be his highest object of love. As lilymc so eloquently put it: All I'm saying is that, at the outset of the general election, there is no reason to expect Trump to do any of the things that he claims to do (whether it's abolishing trade deals, having a sensible foreign policy, or anything else that members of this forum praise him for) because he does not honor oaths in his own personal life.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 10:30 PM
    No. Nonetheless, my point still stands about Trump's lack of commitment to one oath in marriage translating into his lack of commitment to his oath as a President of the united States.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 10:27 PM
    How do you know that? And even if it were true, it would still prove my original point about Trump, namely, that he can't be trusted due to his own personal infidelities.
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 10:25 PM
    Why wouldn't Trump's wives stay faithful to him, especially since he's a billionaire?
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 09:57 PM
    Donald Trump can't even stay faithful as a husband to one woman in his life, having been married three times now. So, how can I trust his oath to the American people and the States to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, as a President?
    69 replies | 860 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 09:51 PM
    I've been on these forums for a long time, and I've participated in plenty of forum polls to know that there are many members who vote in those polls, while simultaneously being against voting, in principle. So, I don't need names.
    113 replies | 1490 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 02:55 PM
    Isn't it ironic that those who are against voting voted for the option "Not Voting"? You just can't help yourselves, can you? :D
    113 replies | 1490 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 01:47 PM
    As one who is currently living in Japan, let me be the first to say that there is a lot of truth to the article in the OP. What is also interesting is that there are many social places called "Buy-Me-A-Drink Bars" (I forget the Japanese term for it) where men can rent women to sit with them over drinks and talk. It's essentially like being on a date, except there are restrictions on physical contact. Japanese men (usually singles) go to these places to express themselves with these gorgeous Japanese women, and the women are paid to just sit, listen, and make the customer feel accepted. It's a real social phenomenon all over Japan.
    34 replies | 471 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 01:29 PM
    Theocrat replied to a thread I love my wife in Open Discussion
    29 replies | 542 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-22-2016, 05:14 AM
    What do I need to study?
    188 replies | 2425 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-21-2016, 05:57 AM
    Thank you, Cruz.
    188 replies | 2425 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-18-2016, 08:57 AM
    The connection continues here.
    1 replies | 179 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-18-2016, 08:38 AM
    Yes.
    112 replies | 1915 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-18-2016, 08:37 AM
    You find them here.
    112 replies | 1915 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-18-2016, 06:22 AM
    Yeah, I don't agree with Dr. Hovind on many theological points, especially as his ones against alcohol consumption. But, nonetheless, you should watch his other seminars to get a full scope on what he's talking about. With the Loch Ness Monster, it's not like people have their cameras ready when a sighting happens, just like when an accident occurs no one can take a picture of the actual accident. It's an unexpected event, so you would not expect there to be many photos of sightings like the Loch Ness Monster. But the fact that there are so many accounts of seeing plesiosaurian creatures all around the world is quite compelling that such creatures still exist today.
    112 replies | 1915 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-18-2016, 06:14 AM
    Once again, secular humanists prove how they don't want any other religious worldview to compete with their own by preempting free speech. They are trying to convince public schools to not have field trips to the Ark Encounter, but what is the harm in having students presented with another perspective that may get them thinking differently about what they've been taught in the public schools (Yes, I know we shouldn't have public schools, but that's beside the point...)? Shouldn't secularists be thrilled to have students visit places like the Ark Encounter, where the assumptions and evidences for a global flood can be challenged in the public's eye, even if it discredits their work? I thought secularist humanists were "free-thinkers," after all. They sure are going through a lot of pains to keep people away from a supposed myth instead of opening a dialogue in the pursuit of truth, no matter where the evidences lie. It smells like fear, to me. Ken Ham writes: Read more about it here.
    112 replies | 1915 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-17-2016, 06:04 AM
    Communist thought is alive and well here in America, and it's been an agenda for a long time, as chronicled here:
    43 replies | 754 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    07-16-2016, 01:37 AM
    Thank you for proving my point. What you've confessed above "gives the game away." You won't accept any evidence until God is described by the natural world, but, once again, you need to understand that the demand, "God has to fit into the natural world," cannot, itself, be verified by the methods used in the natural sciences. In effect, you are appealing to a non-scientific concept in order to make your own assertion about what God has to be. So, you're not refuting any evidence that proves there was a global flood; you're simply stating the basis on which you believe evidences of God's work must be established, in accordance with your Deist assumptions about the nature of God.
    112 replies | 1915 view(s)
More Activity
About Gideon

Basic Information

About Gideon
Biography:
I have prayed, hoped, and dreamt about a Ron Paul Presidential Candidacy for over 5 years
Occupation:
Change Agent

Signature


Peacefully Engaged in Domestic Economic Terrorism Since 2004.

Audit Fort Knox so we will know how much Tungsten backs the FRN!

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
754
Posts Per Day
0.23
General Information
Last Activity
07-24-2013 12:42 AM
Join Date
05-27-2007
Referrals
0
Home Page
http://www.protectronpaul.org

2 Friends

  1. Theocrat Theocrat is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Theocrat
    Theocrat
  2. Tpoints Tpoints is offline

    Banned

    Tpoints
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2
No results to display...
No results to display...

05-06-2016