Tab Content
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 04:35 PM
    That was my first thought as well. God knows how this will play out in the Marxist media organs, more than likely it will be ignored, like the fact that the vast majority of mass shootings are done by colored people. But it could go any way I suppose...but there are always after lessons to be learned: Lesson #1 - From the perspective of Bolden's baby mama - "Do not call cops". I don't know what led up to this, aside from a four day drug bender, but I would be willing to bet a year's salary that Mrs. Bolden was not being calm, quiet, non-threatening and non-combative, trying to do her best to talk Bolden down in the final minutes before he drew his gat and starting popping caps all over.
    28 replies | 319 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 04:34 PM
    Start a journal. Set goals.
    5 replies | 49 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 03:51 PM
    Prancing around with a child firing shots at the stars in the country might draw a different conclusion than prancing into the streets of a city, while high or not, cavorting about with a child in your arms while discharging a weapon. Especially after your girlfriend called the cops on you worried you were a threat.
    28 replies | 319 view(s)
  • luctor-et-emergo's Avatar
    Today, 03:39 PM
    I may not have seen all of the footage but I think there definitely is a tendency -in general these days- to shoot first and talk later. IDK it just seems that way sometimes. It's something you see more frequently in poorer, less developed countries. If the perpetrator dies, there's no case, it's easier and saves money. In the end you'll create a country you do not want your children to grow up in, please consider that.
    28 replies | 319 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 03:16 PM
    Will probably go down as Tom Brady's most memorable Super Bowl victories.
    2553 replies | 89042 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:41 PM
    Sorry Comrade! Thank you for the kind unbad correction to my abhorrent thinking!
    8 replies | 131 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:38 PM
    Right back at it. No the Thread Title does NOT state the Facts.
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:27 PM
    Stating something that has not been determined in a COURT OF LAW as OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. They would have originally made the statement because they BELIEVE the statement they made to be true, and were coerced into redaction. It is NOT FACT. Look, I believe that YOU believe Trump lost, and there is no election fraud. And you can believe that. You can even express those beliefs all you want. But now youre basically demanding that "False Claims" are Objective in their nature and we must change ourselves to suit your view of the world. You are twisting information to suit your narrative. That is called BIAS. And exactly WHY we have such a problem with MSM. Youre merely repeating what the MSM has said because you believe it. Fine if you believe it but it does not make it Objective or True. The type of thinking down the road will lead you to want to pass laws to censor us, but it will backfire on you and you wont be given permission to speak either. If this was Twitter, everyone who has expressed doubt in you would already be banned and ONLY YOU would remain. Fortunately for all of us we have some great Moderators here, and they are not about to ban us. Kind of like the Fact Checkers ONLY "Fact Checking" those expressing Conservative views, but anyone on the Left gets a Free Pass. And for the record, "Fact Check" just means they googled something, which, again does NOT make it true. I am not sure that you understand the difference between Objective and Subjective.
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    8 replies | 131 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:12 PM
    Again BULLSHIT. You can NOT use the phrasing of a Title as evidence that there is no election fraud. -REP
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 02:04 PM
    OMG Dominion sues Rudy Giuliani therefore Giuliani MUST BE LYING! Rudy Giuliani Sued by Dominion Voting Systems For Defamation https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/rudy-giuliani-sued-by-dominion-voting-systems-for-defamation See? Since they are suing then there can not be ANY election fraud!
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 02:00 PM
    Newsmax folded like a cheap suit.
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:59 PM
    Bullshit. "American Thinker Statement Retracting False Claims about Dominion" The difference between False and Not False is subjective. The thread title is presented as Objective, as if it is Fact and Evidence. I believe Trump WON the election. And I believe there IS massive election fraud.
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 01:47 PM
    COVID was a "dry run"...God save us from what they have waiting in the wings.
    8 replies | 204 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    28 replies | 319 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    28 replies | 319 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:44 PM
    One other thing that needs to be pointed out is Correlation does NOT mean Causation. Here is an example of how that can go wrong. Statistically crime is much higher in summer than winter. Also, ice cream sales are much higher in summer than winter. Thus, Ice Cream CAUSES Crime. That is associating Correlation and Causation. Same thing as a Correlation is being manufactured between Republican / Libertarian / Christian / Conservative and Terrorist. The two terms are not mutually exclusive. The Title of the thread is using that Correlation as Causation. This is akin to using the number of people that believe that there is Election Fraud as evidence. They are pissed, I believe they do believe, but it is NOT evidence. With the Title of this thread, the Correlation is that American Journal withdrew their statement as evidence. It is not evidence, they simply redacted their statement because it was challenged, but does not mean that the statements were in fact "False". Period.
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 01:43 PM
    Doting fathers don't go on four day drug benders, freak out with dey Glock and act out to kill mama, baby mama and any person unfortunate enough to be in close range. 10/10 for perfect marksmanship...much as I hate to give cops credit for anything, but they did their job and took out the trash.
    28 replies | 319 view(s)
  • luctor-et-emergo's Avatar
    Today, 01:17 PM
    I agree with the spirit of the argument but I can also see a hypothetical time in the future where the opposite could be said by Massie. If the offence is committed right near the end, the procedure cannot be completed before the end of their term. Hypothetically, if you agree with the barring of holding office part, you may still want to follow through on the impeachment for that purpose. But it's a funny comment and I do think it's about time to stop FDR from holding office again. :D I mean, dead people voting is one thing but dead people holding office. :rolleyes:
    5 replies | 114 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 01:16 PM
    Elections still matter. Voting still matters. This is real policy with real changes that is going to hurt real people. It's not a panacea, it's not the ultimate solution, but it should not have been walked away from, thus leaving the field empty and victory by default to the Marxist mob because "muh agorsim!" or "Orange Man BAD!"
    10 replies | 176 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    10 replies | 176 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:08 PM
    Its a setup. When the vaccines start killing people en masse, the plan is going to be to blame it on some new strain of COVID. Thing is, I think there very well may be a very dangerous bioweapon that is planned to be deployed, but it sure as fuck aint COVID. COVID is just an excuse to deprive the people of their property and ability to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. ... which are now words of Terrorists.
    8 replies | 204 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 01:06 PM
    Far too often the difference between true and false is subjective. It very much sounds like what you may be insinuating is that people should not have ANY RIGHT to speak, instead, make it a PERMISSION that is ONLY GRANTED if the individual will express statements that are in line with "official narrative". And THAT is DANGEROUS. Guess what. I make mistakes. I own them. I learn from them. And I look at those "mistakes" as an "opportunity to learn". Thus, if I am not making mistakes at something, then I am not trying. The current narrative does not allow for ANYONE to make a mistake, or to change their minds. Also HIGHLY DANGEROUS and ONE SIDED NARRATIVE. Guess what else. I express beliefs that I DO NOT AGREE with quite frequently. Its not necessarily about ONLY BEING PERMITTED to express things that "I agree with" because what I am trying to do is express a train of thought and how I arrive at certain conclusions. And I dont think there is ANYTHING MALICIOUS about that. Nor do I think American Journals words are MALICIOUS by any reasonable interpretation. Now, would you hold the same point of view if instead of it being American Journal it was a Petty Criminal and Known Liar? The "damage" is only done to themselves. So by all means I would allow them to continue expressing themselves as much as they want. Many people believe that everyone else does not challenge information that is presented to them. I said "cats are tasty", which implies that I have eaten a cat. I have not. Well thats a good expression of something I dont agree with. But more importantly I do not believe that everyone that reads that statement will accept it without challenge. Thats what idiots do. "I told that cop I did not eat no chocolate cake" while having a face covered in chocolate. Its childish, immature, and shows an inability to recognize that other people have intelligence enough challenge information.
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Today, 01:05 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Brian4Liberty again.
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Today, 12:32 PM
    Local news here has Second Strains Narrative repeating at hypnotic levels. I don't see it ending anytime soon. Face masks Save Lives! Double up is Even Better!
    8 replies | 204 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 12:24 PM
    Even if they are flat out WRONG, they still have a Constitutional RIGHT to express their Beliefs. Freedom comes in two parts, the Freedom to do what you want, and the Freedom to do what you ought. What we OUGHT to do is protect the Right of the People to express beliefs than we do NOT agree with, rather than ONLY those which support an "official narrative". That means you are just as protected, and we can disagree, and STILL get along just fine because we will agree on MANY other things. The thing is, the Popular thing to say will NEVER need to be afforded the Protections of the 1st Amendment. The 1st Amendment exists to protect the Unpopular thing to say. And right now on this topic, the Unpopular thing depends on who you ask and where you are. Unpopular here means "the election was not stolen" but I still have to take the higher road and DEFEND your Right to express that belief. The Unpopular thing pretty much country wide is still that "the election was not stolen". But, the Unpopular thing as far as Media (not all journalists are MSM, like Ben Swann) is "the election was stolen". The 1st Amendment exists so we ALL have the right (notice how that is inclusive of EVERYONE without regard to race color or gender?) to express our beliefs. Now, in a court of law, we also have Innocent Until Proven Guilty. So is American Journal Guilty of expressing incorrect information? Not until it is PROVEN in a Court of Law. Until it is PROVEN, to me, it is simply a Belief, which does allow room for errors and lets me and everyone else change their minds. Which would you prefer? A one sided narrative, or expression of beliefs that differ by everyone equally?
    98 replies | 546 view(s)
More Activity

94 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    you're still around? pffffffffft.
  2. View Conversation
    Did you shoot me a mention that got deleted? I hate it when they delete that stuff. It makes me wonder what the hell was so bad it got deleted without me complaining about it. It's like that feeling you get when someone says they have something important to tell you...later. WTF? Don't tell me until you're ready to tell me.
  3. View Conversation
    I just noticed you're an Influencer
  4. View Conversation
  5. View Conversation
    Hey uncle Danke, I got this new job putting my basement-dweller trolling to work for the good of humanity:
    https://efukt.com/20918_The_Trolling...Pornstars.html
  6. View Conversation
  7. View Conversation
    Have fun with Fruitcake.
  8. View Conversation
    hoi hoi hoi
  9. View Conversation
    hoi hoi
  10. View Conversation
    hoi
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 94
Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
43,215
Posts Per Day
8.95
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
94
Most Recent Message
11-08-2020 03:14 PM
General Information
Join Date
11-06-2007
Referrals
8

46 Friends

  1. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  2. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
  3. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  4. AxXiom AxXiom is offline

    Member

    AxXiom
  5. AZJoe AZJoe is offline

    Member

    AZJoe
  6. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  7. Confederate Confederate is offline

    Banned

    Confederate
  8. coyote_sprit coyote_sprit is offline

    Banned

    coyote_sprit
  9. DamianTV DamianTV is offline

    Member

    DamianTV
  10. disorderlyvision disorderlyvision is offline

    Member

    disorderlyvision
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 46
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 25 12311 ... LastLast

01-25-2021

  • 11:57 AM - oyarde mentioned Danke in post Proud Boys
    ...g my hawaiin shirts Danke ? I have one for ea ...

01-20-2021

  • 11:01 AM - Deleted Posts

01-14-2021


01-05-2021

  • 09:48 AM - Hidden

12-30-2020


12-22-2020


12-21-2020


12-18-2020


12-10-2020


12-02-2020


11-27-2020


11-23-2020


11-16-2020


11-06-2020


11-03-2020


11-01-2020


10-29-2020


10-25-2020


10-24-2020



Page 1 of 25 12311 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

07-22-2018


02-15-2017


02-14-2017



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Page 1 of 525 1231151101501 ... LastLast

01-25-2021


01-24-2021


01-23-2021


01-22-2021


01-21-2021


01-19-2021


01-18-2021


01-16-2021


01-15-2021


01-14-2021



Page 1 of 525 1231151101501 ... LastLast