Tab Content
  • PAF's Avatar
    Today, 06:16 AM
    Back to the topic. Without the 2nd you don’t have the 1st. How important is Property Rights in relation to other natural Rights, and should any Right be taken or forfeited for “the common good”? As a follow up, if Private Property owner protected their property to the point of utilizing arms against an individual or government would he/she be within their right? If the community supported that persons property right, and/or each of their own properties, does the principal change or does it stand the same?
    19 replies | 152 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:12 PM
    I have been researching the economics of the border and the devastating effects of portions of the wall. The numbers are staggering. It also helps to look at pics of those areas, farming, communities, resorts, tourism and the Rio Grande, etc. Have you at least studied the economic impacts that it will have? Also the numbers of bankruptcies and workers losing their jobs, land values plummeting to zero?
    19 replies | 152 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:53 PM
    I would whole-heartedly advocate that on your own dime, provided you don’t convince bureaucrats to tax me to pay for your own private fence/wall.
    19 replies | 152 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:45 PM
    You don’t support it but you feel it is a better option. Makes sense. That would be like saying get rid of insensitives for immigrants but keep Section 8. I guess I’m an “extremist” because I want to eliminate both incentives and Section 8.
    19 replies | 152 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:26 PM
    Every time somebody I knew got nailed for parking or speeding they would get upset, bitch and complain, but then turn around and donate to leo fundraisers. That’s some weird shit.
    8 replies | 128 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:16 PM
    By your definition 5 rounds is acceptable over a 15 round clip depending on where one lives if it is for the common good.
    19 replies | 152 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:38 PM
    I would pose the question, what good is a sovereign country if that country can take your property, and if you refuse, the government convinces the 51% that it’s ok to take it by force?
    19 replies | 152 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:33 PM
    I have to check my schedule but I’m pretty sure I’ll be in bed that day recovering from the flu.
    18 replies | 234 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:04 AM
    Hey all, Things are going to happen either way, even if just parts of it. I am trying to wrap my head around this wall and eminent domain. I am ultra-grounded and can't seem to find any justification for eminent domain but it seems that a number of liberty folks these days are fine and easy with it. It's no secret that establishment republicans are backing trump 100%. I've suggested the only conservative solution without spending a dime is to eliminate not only incentives for the immigrants, but also Section 8 Welfare. I've held that the Republican platform has always been Property Rights, because of course without Private Property, other rights may just as well not exist. Heck, even Mr. Ziffel stood at his doorway brandishing his shotgun while arguing with the sheriff. Talk about property rights and defending one's freedom! Eminent Domain: Take what belongs to you "for the greater good".
    19 replies | 152 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    01-16-2019, 09:37 PM
    By John W. Whitehead January 16, 2019 How far would you really go to secure the nation’s borders against illegal aliens? Would you give the government limitless amounts of money to fight yet another endless war? Surround the entire country with concrete walls and barbed wire? Empower border police to do whatever it takes to crack down on illegal immigrants, even if it means violating their human rights? Hold your nose and tolerate all manner of abuses in name of national security? Would you allow government agents to trample on the rights of anyone who gets in their way, including legal citizens? Relinquish some of your freedoms in exchange for the elusive promise of non-porous borders? Submit to a national ID card that allows the government to target individuals and groups as it chooses in order to identify those who do not “belong”? Turn a blind eye to private prisons and detainment camps that profit off the forced labor of its detainees?
    1 replies | 95 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    01-16-2019, 12:02 PM
    The USMCA “Trade Agreement” Violates Our Constitution And Sets Up Global Government Jan 15, 2019 by Publius Huldah On November 30, 2018, President Trump, along with the Prime Minister of Canada and the President of Mexico, signed the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) “Trade Agreement”. “Trade” is in quotes, because the document isn’t about “trade” – it’s about setting up global government. “Agreement” is in quotes because the document is a “treaty” – and that invokes the two-thirds ratification requirement of Art. II, §2, cl. 2, US Constitution. The USMCA Treaty (“Treaty”) was negotiated by U.S. Trade Representative, Robert Lighthizer. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, which works to move the United States into the North American Union (NAU). Continue:
    9 replies | 849 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    01-16-2019, 11:59 AM
    by Publius Huldah - Jan 15, 2019 On November 30, 2018, President Trump, along with the Prime Minister of Canada and the President of Mexico, signed the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) “Trade Agreement”. “Trade” is in quotes, because the document isn’t about “trade” – it’s about setting up global government. “Agreement” is in quotes because the document is a “treaty” – and that invokes the two-thirds ratification requirement of Art. II, §2, cl. 2, US Constitution. The USMCA Treaty (“Treaty”) was negotiated by U.S. Trade Representative, Robert Lighthizer. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, which works to move the United States into the North American Union (NAU). Continue: https://newswithviews.com/the-usmca-trade-agreement-violates-our-constitution-and-sets-up-global-government/
    1 replies | 76 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-16-2019, 09:15 AM
    Seriously? I'd reckon three quarters of people who identify as weirdosexuals of some sort, are only doing it because it's hip, cool, progressive, woke and "with it".
    55 replies | 372 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-16-2019, 08:32 AM
    Bad enough Matt will not, can not, ever post the article, now he doesn't even bother posting a live link. That said, this guy looks pretty bad, a long term swamp creature. Once again, I will do his work for him: Did Trump just nominate a gun-grabber for Attorney General? https://www.gunowners.org/alert11519.htm
    13 replies | 226 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 08:31 PM
    Good. You miserable motherfuckers have put me out of business three times in my lifetime. Hope ya fucking starve, assenholes.
    16 replies | 247 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 04:35 PM
    By all means, California teachers deserve a doubling of current pay and benefits and reduction by half of class size. Make it so Mr. Newsom.
    3 replies | 77 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 04:30 PM
    Name, Money, Vagina...not necessarily in that order.
    62 replies | 566 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    5 replies | 117 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 01:12 PM
    Top House Republican Calls On Steve King To Resign Over White Supremacist Remark https://sg.news.yahoo.com/top-house-republican-calls-steve-164058012.html Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.), the third-ranking House Republican, on Tuesday said Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) should step down after he questioned why the term “white supremacist” was considered offensive. “I think he should find another line of work,” Cheney told reporters. “His language questioning whether or not the notion of white supremacy is offensive is absolutely abhorrent, it’s racist, we do not support it or agree with it.”
    62 replies | 566 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 12:43 PM
    Taco trucks...pfffft. El coche de la cucarachas
    5 replies | 114 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 12:38 PM
    And what do we do with witches? Burn them!!!
    62 replies | 566 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 12:36 PM
    When the final political goal of the cultural Marxists were brought into the open a few years back: The dispossession and displacement of white people, white western political thought and ideals and removal of those people and their ideas from the public square.
    62 replies | 566 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 12:31 PM
    Let's start with a user fee on every pro sports stadium ticket.
    15 replies | 241 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 12:30 PM
    As long as it is nothing more than an odometer reading from one year to the next, no GPS tracking by mile nonsense.
    15 replies | 241 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 11:09 AM
    The exact quote from the NYT: Heresy! Impure!! Burn him!!!
    62 replies | 566 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 10:56 AM
    Let the purge begin... House GOP Leaders Remove Steve King from Committee Assignments https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/14/house-gop-leaders-remove-steve-king-from-committee-assignments/ The Associated Press 14 Jan 2019
    62 replies | 566 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 10:50 AM
    The Tax That Really Isn’t https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2019/01/15/the-tax-that-really-isnt/ By eric - January 15, 2019 There is a tax which most of us pay that isn’t morally objectionable. Probably because it’s not really a tax. It is the tax on motor fuels.
    15 replies | 241 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 10:10 AM
    You said it "flirts" with #metoo-ism. I posted why I thought #metoo-ism is so dangerous, and should not even be "flirted" with. Outside of that, I don't really care all that much either.
    177 replies | 2361 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    01-15-2019, 10:06 AM
    So, almost a million tax ticks have not gotten paid...this is bad why?
    43 replies | 770 view(s)
More Activity
About randroots

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
4
Posts Per Day
0.00
General Information
Last Activity
07-24-2015 06:59 AM
Join Date
11-30-2014
Referrals
0

25 Friends

  1. AFPVet AFPVet is offline

    Member

    AFPVet
  2. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  3. Barrex Barrex is offline

    Member

    Barrex
  4. Christian Liberty
  5. ClydeCoulter ClydeCoulter is offline

    Member

    ClydeCoulter
  6. Deborah K Deborah K is offline

    Member

    Deborah K
  7. Ecolibertarian Ecolibertarian is offline

    Member

    Ecolibertarian
  8. Feeding the Abscess
  9. FSP-Rebel FSP-Rebel is offline

    Mr. Republitarian

    FSP-Rebel
  10. Gage Gage is offline

    Member

    Gage
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 25
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...