• Krugminator2's Avatar
    Today, 09:57 AM
    Maybe. That probably is true. I don't see any need to hasten the process of going to zero though. I am in favor of delaying the adjustment of having 20%+ of population unemployed for as long as possible. Not something I am embracing with open arms.
    103 replies | 17765 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    Today, 09:32 AM
    The thread right below this is about bartering. You might think depressions are fun and cool. And suicides and all loss of meaning in life because job losses are great. I don't share that view. I don't want to go anywhere near a world where people are back to living like savages and bartering.
    103 replies | 17765 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    Today, 09:15 AM
    Nobody is saying it creates wealth. Peter Schiff again being a buffoon who continues to embarrass free market people. It does however avoid debt deflation. Governments have also destroyed economies by just letting the world go to hell. See United States 1929-1933. What you call Austrian is just Rothbardian. Hayek didn't agree at all. https://www.themoneyillusion.com/what-did-hayek-really-think-of-deflation/ https://www.coordinationproblem.org/2011/05/hayek-on-deflation.html
    103 replies | 17765 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:26 PM
    He is calling them out for not being full fledged communists like him. I agree with Ron on 99% of economic issues.
    31 replies | 111 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:13 PM
    So basically this guy had the worst of all worlds take. Doesn't want to help businesses get through a government induced liquidity crunch but does want individuals to stop paying bills and delivery people to stop working until the government gives them ten times more handouts. Not a good ally.
    31 replies | 111 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:08 AM
    The plunge protection team would have no reason to be in the market right now. The market isn't plunging. Rational would be for the markets to go up. You had historically oversold on all time frames, massive QE and a fiscal bill that is 10% of GDP. Trump is bulling up an infrastructure bill. I think/hope volatility comes back after April 1. Would be nice to see one more sell off attempt. No rational reason to be bearish now. Once in a decade bull opportunity setting up.
    128 replies | 5506 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:40 AM
    You have end of quarter rebalancing. Pensions and stock and bond funds have to rebalance to get their target weight of stocks to bonds back into balance which means buying stocks which got hammered relative to bonds. Longer term the combination of QE infinity and the big deficits are bullish for stocks. Everyone thinks is a bear market. We'll see. I will use one more selloff on negative virus news to buy with longer term money. The tables are set for a raging bull market over the next 12 months. Wouldn't be surprised if the market doesn't go up like 1999. Everyone thought the market was done in 97 and 98 then you had a blowoff run up. This sell off seems like a potential fake out. 1244942519365967872 1244923990994452480
    128 replies | 5506 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-30-2020, 06:08 PM
    "The silver lining is that this next crisis could finally demolish the Keynesian welfare-warfare state and the fiat money system." What is that going to look like Ron? Venezuela? For some reason, I highly doubt that will mean a smooth transition to anarchotopia. If the Fed loses control, we are going to be ten times less free than we are now. And a much poorer country. This whole idea of people rooting for collapse is the most bonkers thing I see in the liberty movement. There will be no liberty in a collapse.
    4 replies | 227 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-28-2020, 01:17 PM
    Here are the following books I have read by Austrians. Have the physical copies nicely dogeared, underlined and coffee stained on all but Rothbard's which I got from the library system. 1. Human Action 2. Theory of Money and Credit 3. America's Great Depression 4. Economics in One Lesson 5. Road to Serfdom 6. The Constitution of Liberty 7. The Fatal Conceit
    39 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-28-2020, 10:18 AM
    Makes sense but what does that have to do with the fact that most businesses and people aren't smart about their money? 1243885552853753857
    39 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-28-2020, 08:41 AM
    That part is true. The Fed actively pursued a deflationary policy as interventionist Rothbard advocated. They tightened credit to protect the dollar and caused incomes to fall which made it harder to service debt which led to a spiral of bankruptcies. Deflation caused the first part of the Great Depression. It was THE reason. And that intervention was a major government failure. So you think union rules, tariffs, tax hikes and public works projects like the Hoover Dam caused the stock market to fall 86%? Those things didn't ever cause cause the stock market to drop 86% and unemployment over 20% before or since. Wonder why. Real puzzler. Maybe discarding that theory would be worthwhile.
    39 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-27-2020, 07:09 PM
    I am sure telling people in towns of boarded up restaurants and small businesses that a new management team is all that is needed to get things started will be real effective. Given that this is the single most interesting topic to me and I have thought about this very topic and debated it for the last decade, I suspect I have read any author you could mention and have considered their opinion. I strongly suspect you have read exactly zero people that I have mentioned. Start with listening to what Milton Friedman said about the depression and then try to refute.
    39 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-27-2020, 06:27 PM
    This isn't a stimulus like public works projects. Obama's plan was just a bunch of programs like short term tax cuts and programs like cash for clunkers. It was Keynesian stimulus (which has a mixed record) to boost spending. This bill has little to do with stimulus and everything to do with avoiding the systemic risk of bankruptcies. That is why most of it is loans to backstop businesses and the remainder is checks to keep people paying bills. We had a depression in the 1930's called the Great Depression. It was caused by letting banks fail which caused depositors not to be able to pays debts which caused more bank failures and a money supply collapse which caused people throughout the economy not be able to service debt. It was a never ending spiral. Those bankruptcies took years to settle. How did the let things go to hell method work? The Peter Schiff method was a decade of pain. What happens if you just let things work themselves out right now? Think hard. If people don't pay rent, the property management companies can't pay their mortgage and they fold. If corporations in vulnerable industries like hospitality start folding, you are talking about tens of millions of people whose jobs are at stake. Bankruptcies mean layoffs and they also mean a complete halt to new investment. What happens if investment halts throughout the entire economy for years while bankruptcies get settled?
    39 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-27-2020, 06:07 PM
    Safe to say I won't be getting a check so nothing to spend. The fact that you are comparing this to interventions of Bush and Obama (both of which I would oppose) shows you don't understand the situation at all.
    39 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-27-2020, 06:02 PM
    I basically agree with his analysis. It is a nice critique of the problems with all of this intervention. But the problem is he thinks things will just work themselves out if you do nothing. He thinks the Great Depression was just some accident from tariffs or whatever. If you just let everyone go bankrupt right now, you will have a spiral that will take years if not a decade or more to get through. I heard the stories from grandparents of the Great Depression. That is something that I don't want to experience. There is no good solution to this.
    39 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-27-2020, 05:52 PM
    There has been such a massive buildup in private sector corporate debt. If you do nothing, you could have years of 20% unemployment. That situation won't hold. The bolded part in the article below is why I favor the nuclear weapons the Fed and government are using but I think we are in for a lot pain and potential systemic risk. The problem is this is a Faustian bargain. These actions just get us through the short term This whole thing is a massive experiment for high stakes and I am not so sure we are going to come out it as a great country. The country needs to reduce leverage to survive. This isn't over when the virus abates. https://www.guggenheiminvestments.com/perspectives/global-cio-outlook/the-2020-faustian-bargain?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=scott+minerd&utm_content=global+cio+outlook&utm_campaign=the+2020+faustian+bargain
    39 replies | 1134 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-27-2020, 02:11 PM
    Ok doomer. "Global Poverty Decline Denialism" https://reason.com/2019/01/31/global-poverty-decline-denialism/
    13 replies | 1359 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-27-2020, 11:25 AM
    Global poverty rate drops to record low 10%: World Bank https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/19/world-bank-global-poverty-rate-drops-to-record-low.html https://www.aei.org/economics/aging/world-poverty-rate-plummets/ The idea that the US impoverishes countries by taking their resources and looting is a popular talking point on the fringe left but is easily debunked. People are living dramatically better worldwide over the last few decades.
    13 replies | 1359 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-26-2020, 07:24 PM
    Not that this matters or I should get much credit but Dow rallies more than 1,300 points, capping its biggest 3-day surge since 1931 https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/25/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-news.html
    128 replies | 5506 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-26-2020, 05:35 PM
    Both are successful. One is very successful in markets and the other is a successful marketer and salesman.
    9 replies | 478 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-26-2020, 04:05 PM
    At least you finally cited a non-idiot.
    9 replies | 478 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-26-2020, 01:11 PM
    He bought puts to hedge his long portfolio. His fund is up .4% for the year vs the market being down 20% or whatever. He is not up $2.7 billion. Having a hedged portfolio doesn't make for a good story though. Edit: The exact number has probably changed after today but he said the same thing I did which I don't understand how this isn't obvious to every reporter. Instead of publishing tabloid trash fake news. 1243303297441615873
    9 replies | 478 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-25-2020, 03:05 PM
    I would never listen to any commentator for financial advice. But Jim Cramer ran an extremely successful hedge fund. 24% after fees and 30% gross return. Jim Cramer was a legit trader. Peter Schiff is an underperforming gold salesman with dog shit mutual funds. These are facts. Not opinions. Peter Schiff is a bad money manager. Jim Cramer wildly successful.
    88 replies | 1293 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-25-2020, 07:03 AM
    He did get the mortgage stuff right and then was wrong the next 12 years. Most economists thought we would go zero in the next recession so that wasn't any bold prediction. That isn't anything. The list of his wrong pronouncements is endless. I am not debating this. It isn't a matter of opinion that his entire inflation premise is wrong. Those are the facts. Here is debating an actual economist, Scott Sumner who has been more right than anyone the last 12 years. This is from 2013 with Peter Schiff talking about the super secret inflation. That was seven years ago. Commodities just hit multi decade lows.
    88 replies | 1293 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-24-2020, 10:18 PM
    I do admit when I am wrong. I have also been right like 95% of my posts on markets. Many very astute posts. But I absolutely own when I am wrong. That is something Peter Schiff and Ron Paul do not do. If you listened and acted on their financial advice, suicide would probably have been the best option if you listened to their advice They were wrong about everything. Not just kind of wrong. Catasrophically wrong. The worst records I have ever seen. They are very confident. And very wrong. They babbled endlessly about the market plunging and inflation. There was no inflation and the stock market is still up 300% from the bottom. They never own it. Ron said bonds were a bubble in 2012. If you shorted bonds then, killing yourself would be the best bet at this point. Ron has been bearish on the United States since the 70s. He has a portfolio of junk gold miners that have lagged the market forever and gold while stocks as a whole are up a zillion percent over that time. Schiff isn't even right about this. The market is plunging on virus and corporate debt not because of anything the Fed did or government spending. And if the government does their job (which it looks like they just might) and things recover he will be back to babbling for another decade about the world ending and be wrong the whole time.
    88 replies | 1293 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-24-2020, 07:31 PM
    Larry's a big gold standard guy. You should love him. Thinks the Fed has no power to do anything for the economy. Tax cuts answer to everything. I, on the other hand, have thought he was a boob and posted about it going back to when Rand hired Steve Moore (part of the Kudlow, Laffer, Moore team) to write his tax plan.
    88 replies | 1293 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-24-2020, 04:33 PM
    Larry Kudlow obviously reading my Ron Paul Forums posts. 1242576138142187527
    88 replies | 1293 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-23-2020, 08:43 PM
    Zippy was a left wing troll who was contrarian for the sake of being contrarian. My view on this differs from Ron Paul's and everyone in the forum but I believe the evidence from 1929 and 2008 supports my view.
    88 replies | 1293 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-23-2020, 08:14 PM
    There is moral hazard but businesses are going to behave better no matter what after this. 2008-09 scared banks and they have been much less eager to lend. The question is what is the alternative? The damage from this could take years to unravel if massive action is taken. There aren't enough GoFundMe's to help everyone out. My view on the Fed matches Scott Sumner's, who is the most notable Friedmanite economist. https://www.themoneyillusion.com/good-news-the-feds-moving-toward-whatever-it-takes/ And Bullard at the Fed probably has the right idea about plugging the leak. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-fed-bullard-idUSKBN2190FT These are just my opinions (which counts for nothing), but I do know that playing fire and having Great Depression II isn't something I want to get anywhere near. The Great Depression wasn't just some accident from tariffs or income inequality or spending too much or whatever nonsense reason. It came about from mass bankruptcy that spiraled out of control.
    88 replies | 1293 view(s)
  • Krugminator2's Avatar
    03-23-2020, 05:40 PM
    The Fed doing anything other than loans is separate.
    88 replies | 1293 view(s)
More Activity
About Krugminator2

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
3,528
Posts Per Day
1.70
General Information
Last Activity
Today 01:21 PM
Join Date
08-01-2014
Referrals
0

04-01-2020


03-24-2020


03-23-2020


03-18-2020


03-04-2020


03-02-2020


01-07-2020


08-05-2018


04-06-2018


03-17-2018


06-10-2017


No results to display...
Page 1 of 111 1231151101 ... LastLast

04-01-2020


03-31-2020


03-28-2020


03-27-2020


03-26-2020


03-25-2020



Page 1 of 111 1231151101 ... LastLast