TheCount
Member

Trump is a petty tyrant and a narcissist, but whether or not he gets to become a dictator depends on those around him, those in key government positions, and the general public. Would he if he could? Yes, absolutely. Will he get that chance? To be determined.

Believing any lie so long as it's told to you by the "right" people is exactly the same level of stupid whether your chosen "right" people are MSNBC news anchors, blue checks on Twitter, or any such category of retard. Swallowing Trump's blatantly obvious and self-contradictory lies is thoroughly in the category of tonguing his taint. Maybe try thinking for yourself instead of just reflexively believing or disbelieving depending on your parasocial relationship with the speaker?

1732961684514607532 1732961686452420908 Seems like the real account. Their social media team must just be bad.

I disagree. In the current political environment, any sufficiently outspoken figure is showered with attention, praise, and money. The House is full of examples of entirely worthless, nonproductive politicians who nonetheless dominate the media environment and have come to represent their "sides" of society purely by striving to be the loudest partisan in the room.

As @acptulsa said upthread, Trump worshipers ascribe to a mythology that paints him as both infallible and incapable. Does he have "all the best people" or have all his appointees betrayed him? The myth claims that he is the greatest leader and politician our time but yet was completely unable to accomplish anything, all as a result of an unfathomably complex series of backstabs and failures on the part of everyone except Trump. It amounts to credulously believing a young child's convoluted, implausible story of who broke the window. Then why pretend it's all for freedom and liberty and individualism? If they want a monarch, they should call for his coronation.

I see what you mean, but if I were to rephrase slightly I would say that the system attracts the Trumps, etc. rather than creates them.

Are judges that he appointed also part of the old guard? It's a wacky world we live in where the same people who say that they support small government, states rights, and the ability of people to choose their leaders are also the ones lining up to tongue the taint of a guy who wanted the federal government to overrule states' election processes and replace their electors with stooges hand-picked by his personal lawyer.

K Trump's conspiracy against himself, I suppose. I'd love to know how this generated votes.

You're absolutely right, all of the myths of Trump cannot simultaneously be true. To me the most glaring issue is: Why were nearly none of the hundreds of millions of dollars of post-election day donations used to fight the results of the election?

No No No

Ask yourself which is more likely: - A legal team led by Rudy Giuliani got laughed out of 62 courtrooms - Every judge, regardless of ideology and party, across nine states, the District of Columbia, and the Supreme Court, are all part of a vast conspiracy to keep Trump out of office

Yes, that's exactly my point, thank you. That's why I used the word "tendency." He and his administration advocated a legal interpretation which means that the executive branch has the sole authority to choose the next president. What would you call a system where each executive gets to choose the next executive? Fraud so concentrated that Trump himself chose to pocket the vast majority of the "stop the steal" donations rather than put up any legal fight?

This you?

Would it be legal for Kamala to walk into the joint session on January 6th with a bag full of pre-signed elector statements and use them to declare Biden the first president to win 100% of the electoral votes?

His corrupt attempts to overturn election results certainly suggest that he has that tendency.

The military does provide that service. You've been lied to. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2023/07/28/congressman-walks-back-claim-pentagon-stuck-gold-star-family-60000-bill.html

Should I know or care who Iger is?

4.

Well, your other option is a nice, cozy place online where people tell you lies that conveniently align with your preconceived beliefs.

Incredible, you predicted that a democrat from a safely democratic district would vote with the democrats. I don't know how you managed.

... the same Elon Musk who rushed to go on an Israel trip the moment he was accused of antisemitism? This Musk? This is the one telling people to go fuck themselves?

Wow, with so many possible causes of cardiac arrest, how will we ever know which one it was? I propose an entirely new process wherein a group of ordinary people will decide, after being fully informed by numerous experts who will be called to truthfully render their professional opinions. Unfortunately, I have yet to come up with a name for the group of people and the process.

It may shock you to learn that a lack of oxygen is one of the causes of cardiac arrest.

In addition to not being strangled, George Floyd was also not killed by a poorly worded wish on a monkey's paw.

It was presented as evidence and the coroner himself was called as a witness to testify. The report is public. It's been public since before the trial. A two word Google search will present it to you as the top result. The report lists the cause of death as cardiopulmonary arrest. Nowhere in the report does it say what caused the cardiopulmonary arrest.

I can say that he's in prison because the gingerbread man mafia put him there, but saying so doesn't make it true.

It turns out that twitter isn't a court of law.

Oh no