PRB
Member

there's plenty of concieveable ways, but irrelevant, there's no evidence there's been any state which had even 1000 fraudulent votes, much less 10,000 or 50,000.

Correct, they're all estimates, that's far different than comparing it to REGISTERED VOTERS which rely on literally manual lists of specific people. So, you can't compare apples to oranges, especially when they're not even time specific. As the easiest example, yes, people die, and people move. Those don't automatically get reflected in the registrations, HOWEVER, you know what really matters? VOTES, votes did not exceed either voters or registered voters or eligible voters. Here's how we know : we know how many ballots were either sent out or requested. So if you moved out of state, the only way your ballot could have been returned is it you requested it to be mailed out of state (which wouldn't be fraud), or somebody at your old address found it for you. But guess what? Your old address's occupant probably got their own ballot too, so for that person to forge your ballot would be risky for no return.

for it to have any meaningful effect, you need at least 10,000 people doing it in one state just to get about 10,000 votes. sorry, but things like that don't happen without somebody getting caught. it requires organization, discipline, and the victims not noticing. because there's only 2 ways you can steal a ballot -the victim doesn't want to vote and doesn't care (or dead) -the victim does want to vote, so there's a discrepancy (you'll get caught, or at least there would be a record of attempted fraud) with such high turn out, you have to also consider safe states vs swing states. in safe states, it doesn't matter, you'll never get enough fake votes. in swing states, people vote and notice, this dynamic is pretty double edged, and statistics with some auditing can easily reveal any meaningful differences.

keyword is ESTIMATE.

read that again.

Well, no states have more registered voters than eligible voters, that's for starters. let's prove that first. No. Short answer is no. Because it can't be done on scale or in volume, so there is no subtantial effect.

Solyndra isn't Texas.

yeah, pretty much.

Honestly, I agree. We should have more antitrust laws to prevent monopolies (or de facto monopolies).

Capitalism sucks ass when you're on the wrong side, I tell you!

Molyeneux?

I'm that good at triggering you?

Cancel culture isn't our country, it's just one aspect of it, or, one of the aspects of capitalism.

The past 3 months have proven Trump has the worst attorneys money can buy. (jmdrake should step up)

Cancel culture is just capitalism.

Texas doesn't subsidize, you're thinking California.

yep, which is not preventing you from doing it, so you can't blame the people who got there first, you can sell your apples to other places while the demand is low, then sell them to the currently saturated market when the demand increases in a storm. So either way, it's not wind's fault that nobody wanted to provide more electricity.

So you admit the Alaska state government website never confirmed the eligible voters numbers. Got it.

no, Texans love him.

he should just resign.

Guys! Here's the best part! GOD I'm so jealous of these bills! https://nypost.com/2021/02/19/homeowners-hit-with-massive-electric-bills-amid-texas-winter-storm/

There's literally no law that's stopping other sources from making more.

Alaska state website said they had more registered voters than eligible voters?

stored or sent to somewhere else to use.

Uhhh, no, that's not how it works. there's no law that stops you from making more and selling more and selling it to other states. Reliance is completely due to shortage of supply or too much demand, there's no legal or artificial barrier. nobody stopped anybody from making more carbon emitting energy sources should they decide they wanted to.

"Loss of ten percent of grid supply when running at 100 percent capacity is enough to cause downstream cut outs and overloads of supply from all sources as the automated computerized system tries to save itself." So your solution is to not have wind at all, so you'll run out of power sooner???

No, it hasn't. You're citing websites that were not updated.

That's the problem.

Exactly! He's a paid shill.

No, because it's not proven.