Knightskye
Member

You're just seriously trying to make me prejudiced against white males.

We celebrate what we've done with the internet, and we should. But they discovered an interesting trait of it, and they're using the hell out of it. They've created not just one artificial reality, but two. They've created an overt Officially Approved Reality where sterilizing your children is a perfectly rational thing to do, assisted by The Science™. And they've created a covert Rebel Reality where no woman in any city over 100,000 goes unraped. There is a definite pattern of spin to the rebel narrative too. That couldn't happen back when there were four networks. People were likely enough to have been exposed to the same thing that it was what people talked about "around the water cooler" at work. People just weren't walking around and interacting with each other despite existing in alternate realities, not they way we do today. If we want to stay grounded in reality -- truly based -- we have to turn our backs on both these narratives. And we have to get over the fact that when we do, we suddenly have some unexpected "strange bedfellows". We need them.

I don't think anything can break it up faster than legit electing a candidate the head gamers in charge don't approve of. I don't think they can adapt. I don't think they have a good contingency plan for that. And I think RFKJr. is just that, and with enough natural name recognition to get 'er done, with some help.

You don't think they'll kill him? Why? Because he's one of their own? These people are eugenicists. If they can gain any advantage by shooting his senile ass, they will, and they'll tell each other it was merciful euthanasia.

But you have to admit he did it well. He sewed the timeline right up.

They just keep doubling down. Admitting they were wrong is traumatic enough for some people without having to admit they were wrong about that and that being wrong caused that much harm. They're trying to get as much of society as possible mired in that morass.

SPLIT TO: Mike Johnson, white privilege, etc. https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1781000686424977907 1781000686424977907

https://twitter.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1781068434140262801 1781068434140262801

It all makes sense now...

https://twitter.com/shellenberger/status/1781047600663122257 1781047600663122257

https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1781004853356925222 1781004853356925222

https://twitter.com/EricAbbenante/status/1781051285652816167 1781051285652816167

Oh, dear. Oh my, oh my, oh, my. For God's sake. That should be hilarious. But, just... Wow.

Well, you know, it's such gibberish that I had trouble deconstructing it. So I looked to the actions of Katherine Mahar for guidance, and I could not find one hint of genuine openness. Openness can be... closed? I got so confused I just gave up. Sorry.

Of course not. When your deranged narrative runs counter to every single known fact, obfuscating and confounding are the only strategies open to you.

People know what he did because the free publicity they've been giving him for nine years straight is unprecedented. And still you tell this deranged tale of the deep state ignoring him.

About what? About what fate awaits a nation when its people decide being wilfully ignorant is a virtue?

If a country did to us what Trump did to them an we didn't go to war with them, you'd squeal like a stuck pig. "He didn't do it. And he had a good excuse for doing it." Got it.