Tab Content
  • Conza88's Avatar
    04-29-2016, 06:09 PM
    Yeah, you clearly didn't understand it. I didn't see any "state" mentioned specifically in that excerpt of yours; aye? Put down the pitchfork. Who is granting the state rights? :rolleyes:
    35 replies | 676 view(s)
  • Conza88's Avatar
    04-29-2016, 08:30 AM
    Yes. Meh. Good for speculators for being treated well in a sense. See; JT's review.
    13 replies | 546 view(s)
  • Conza88's Avatar
    04-29-2016, 08:28 AM
    The pre-1914 world saw no immigration issues or policies, and no real border controls. Instead, there was free movement in the real sense; there were no questions asked, people were treated respectfully and one did not even need official documents to enter or leave a country. This all changed with the First World War, after which states seem to compete with having the least humane view on foreigners seeking refuge within its territory.The “immigration policies” of modern states is yet another licensing scheme of the 20th century: the state has enforced licensing of movement. It is virtually impossible to move across the artificial boundaries of the state’s territory in the search for opportunity, love, or work; one needs a state-issued license to move one’s body, be it across a river, over a mountain or through a forest. The Berlin Wall may be gone, but the basic principle of it lives and thrives. Yet the immigration issue seems to be somewhat of a divide within libertarianism, with two seemingly conflicting views on how to deal with population growth through immigration. On the one hand, it is not possible as a libertarian to support a regulated immigration policy, since government itself is never legitimate. This is the somewhat classical libertarian standpoint on immigration: open borders. On the other hand, the theory of natural rights and, especially, private property rights tells us anyone could move anywhere — but they need first to purchase their own piece of land on which to live or obtain necessary permission from the owner. Otherwise immigration becomes a violation of property rights, a trespass. This is an interpretation of a libertarian-principled immigration policy presented by Hans-Hermann Hoppe a few years ago, which since then has gained increasing recognition and support. I intend to show that the libertarian idea is as powerful as we claim, and that there is no reason we should not be able to reach consensus in the immigration issue. Both sides in this debate, the anti-government-policy as well as the pro-private-property, somehow fail to realize there is no real contradiction in their views. The anti-government-policy immigration standpoint (or, the open borders argument) and the pro-private-property ditto are two sides of a coin; their respective proponents have simply fallen prey to the devil in the details. Let’s go through the main arguments of both camps, and see to their respective strengths and weaknesses, and I’ll show you how this is true. We must not forget libertarianism is not a teleological dogma striving for a certain end; it rather sees individual freedom and rights as the natural point of departure for a just society. When people are truly free, whatever will be will be. Hence, the question is not what the effects of a certain immigration policy would be, but whether there should be one at all.
    35 replies | 676 view(s)
  • Conza88's Avatar
    04-29-2016, 08:19 AM
    I literally cannot fathom this. He did NOT speak nicely of Ron back in the day; and he was always dismissive. He was literally incapable of seeing Ron's nuanced approach; that his real goal was education first & foremost: Stefan was guilty of the purist deviation fallacy. I haven't been listening / paying attention to him or his podcasts for about a year. What did I miss? How on earth has it gone all Trumptard?
    35 replies | 676 view(s)
  • Conza88's Avatar
    04-28-2016, 04:17 AM
    Did you make the video ;o
    42 replies | 148 view(s)
  • Conza88's Avatar
    04-27-2016, 08:50 AM
    No Rothbard, try again.
    42 replies | 148 view(s)
No More Results

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
11,438
Posts Per Day
3.64
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
50
Most Recent Message
03-10-2015 12:12 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 02:05 AM
Join Date
10-15-2007
Referrals
4
Home Page
http://www.youtube.com/user/Conza88
View Conza88's Blog

Recent Entries

The Kony Kollection

by Conza88 on 03-08-2012 at 11:03 AM


At the beginning of the documentary we see Jason Russell tell a crowd of young people that they must STAND AGAINST WAR. By the end of the documentary, he advocates MILITARY INTERVENTION*. Perhaps we should think about this a little more deeply.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Ron Paul and Self-Government

by Conza88 on 02-24-2012 at 02:56 AM
Quote Originally Posted by BrittanySligar View Post
That video didn't convince you? Watch this clip from a few days ago, at 40:00. He "slipped up" in his seattle speech

"If you had a perfectly ideal world, and you had liberty passed back to the individual, it would be self-government".

Not sure where a state comes into play in a society of "self-government". Self-government is synonymous with voluntaryism / anarcho-capitalism.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
No results to display...
No results to display...

04-29-2016


04-28-2016


04-27-2016


04-26-2016


04-25-2016


04-23-2016


04-22-2016