• osan's Avatar
    Today, 08:36 AM
    All you claim may in fact prove out, but only time will tell. So my question to you then is what would you see done? And here I ask not for pie in the sky things that were never going to happen, but actual things that one could do in the real world. Take up arms and start shooting? Say "fuck it, get me a beer woman" and sit and do nothing as you wait either for someone else to make things all better? The sorts of change we need in the context of an environment of unbridled tyranny cannot be had along "normal" avenues. So what, then, do we DO?
    5 replies | 225 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:54 AM
    And what does all this reveal? We are at war, literally. We are, and have been, in a civil war for decades. It is not a hot war. It is our own domestic roll of cold warfare, yet so few have been able to see it. It has only been since 9/11 that this truth has been coming progressively more apparent. Why Theye have chosen to reveal themselves, who can say? Seems a gross miscalculation to me. Perhaps Theye thought we'd been so thoroughly marinated in fear that we would do their bidding no matter what it might be? Or are Theye not really on the ropes as it now appears? We must bear in mind that while Theye do not likely have their hands directly on the silo captains' hands, they most likely have them on the hands of those who work in places like the Wuhan bioweapons facility. I would not be too fast to cheer Trump's reascension... not just yet. Time will tell. Foists of apocalyptic "if we can't have it, nobody can" plagues upon the world aside, we nonetheless are far from recovered from the ravages of the globalist cabal. The comments of that rageshrieking Democrat dreg the other day about being at war is actually true, only not in the sense she meant it. If you look at the major political movements of the past 100+ years through the lens of Quiet Wars†, everything begins to come into sensible focus. This is why though very wary of Trump's current wave of measures, I nonetheless welcome them in any event because up until now we've been doing the same political things over and over, decade over decade expecting different results. Given the direction in which things have been going, especially these past four years, we no longer have that much to lose, except our cheap and petty comforts and conveniences, given how whittled down as our rights and freedoms have become. I say throw the dice, come what may. Let us have courage for once and act like men. Nothing is worse than sitting in that pot as the water grows ever warmer.
    5 replies | 225 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:28 AM
    osan started a thread AI Forum? in Science & Technology
    Barring a return to the stone age due to social collapse, due in its turn to human Stupid, AI is here to stay and should have its own forum. I've now had hundreds of "conversations" with various AIs. There is much to discuss.
    0 replies | 1 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 07:17 AM
    Oh no... a Democrat....
    2 replies | 43 view(s)
  • Origanalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:03 AM
    Ya, nobody believes your cult is anything more than it is, mental illness. Your brief moment is over, stay away from the kids if you want to live out your miserable existence. Or not.
    462 replies | 62135 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Today, 03:45 AM
    I take offense to this. You have thusly transgressed
    2 replies | 43 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 03:38 AM
    Words are important. They are the most important things in our lives, believe it or not. Therefore, our choices of wording is perforce important, and to that point I would turn your attention toward that which has come to be known as the Non-Aggression Principle, AKA the "NAP". While the spirit of the NAP is righteous, the choice of "aggression" in the moniker is quite unfortunate. It states that the initiation of aggression is always a bad thing, but fails to what constitutes "aggression". Because of this, I have witnessed endless examples of gross misunderstanding of "aggression", more specifically its initiation, such that some of those cases tap dance right past the absurd. Words are important. Therefore, and because the term "aggression" seems to evade far too many in terms of a sufficiently precise meaning, I suggest leaving that term in the rear view mirror in favor of "transgression". Transgression is always incorrect as a matter of definition, whereas aggression is not. It is the fact of the latter that we run into the problem of semantics. Let us illustrate with an example. Johnny tells Janey he is going "let her have it". Is that aggression? There are those who say that it is, and those who deny it with some nontrivial vehemence. This is the key of the problem. As for my view and taken all else equal, Janey stands well within her right to self-defense to take whatever measures she sees fit to remove what we may conversationally take as a threat to her welfare. If she walks away, fine. Kick Johnny in the balls? OK, if imprudent in practical terms. Draw a sidearm and drill him a deep fathom down? You bet. And yet there are those who would argue that any such physical action against Johnny would constitute an initiation of aggression, whereas his ravings would not. Forgetting that this is sheer stupidity, prima facie, we can at least state as a fact that the difference of opinion exists. Counter example: siblings have their moments. Janey irritates Johnny in some manner and Johnny blithely lets her know "I'm going to murder you". Kids say the darnedest things. In all good likelihood Johnny was not to be taken literally, and to Janey's retrieval of dad's 686 revolver, whereby she holds Johnny at bay until police arrive is probably not justified. And yet, Johnny uttered words that under differing circumstances might justly see him interred. Words are important, but so is context.
    2 replies | 43 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 03:30 AM
    1 Peter 3:12 For the eyes of the Lord are over the righteous, and his ears are open unto their prayers: but the face of the Lord is against them that do evil.
    3079 replies | 475737 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Today, 02:49 AM
    While this bill is good, I guess? It just kinda seems silly. Silly that we've let it get to this point and this is the best we can do? Beg our masters for an additional layer of bureaucracy before adding new rules against us?
    1 replies | 39 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:33 PM
    And this is just scratching the surface, and the system is losing it's everfucking mind right now because of it. Wait until the DOGE crew starts making the connection between the "legit" money that is appropriated for things like USAID being used for these nefarious purposes and the "black" money from running drugs and sex and "snuff" trafficking of children and arms dealing and what that money sponsors around the world.
    88 replies | 1607 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:22 PM
    By any objective observation, a great deal has already been done. No government action or cessation of action, in and of itself, is going to cure the rot in the soul of our people or heal this land. That is in God's hands. But it can clear the air, root out the corruption, shut down the Fifth Columnists and remove the invaders. As far as the Small Hat Club goes, we're still another generation or two away from addressing that logically.
    88 replies | 1607 view(s)
  • Origanalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:03 PM
    Anybody buying this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pjd_TzIwvw
    46 replies | 3700 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 PM
    And that sort of outcome in a nation such as America manifest as a result of the failure of its people to be the government. When people pawn off their responsibility to be part of the governance of the nation, choosing to trust strangers with their freedoms, they effectively take to their knees in supplication to evil men to rape their rights in every orifice. We are the reason everything is shitty. We failed ourselves, our fellows, our children, and so on by not being the smartest, morally soundest, and most involved we can be for the sakes of all Americans. To defend your rights is to defend my own.
    8 replies | 426 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:15 PM
    Mr. Rock, meet Mr. Hardplace. The problems here are manifold, but the essence of the root problem is that the nature of all American "government" has degenerated to such a degree that we can no longer rely on the so-called "system" to correct itself via the instrumentalities intended for such purposes. This has arisen largely due to the fact that the American people are not united in the fundamentals of what it is to be American. The schism between "left" and "right, "conservative" and "progressive" is so deeply radical, we see these yawning chasms between what Republican and Democrat agents of "government" want and do in terms of policy and the passage of legislation. Herein we see a very profound flaw in the architecture of "government" in America. Furthermore, the mission of the federal government has experienced vast scope creep. The intent of the Constitution was to limit the fedgov to a precious few tasks including the common defense and courts. That's it. But perversions of the Constitution have lead to welfare states, regulatory empire, promotional empire, military empire, and so on down a dreary list of powers that have been assumed in gross violation of the metes, bounds, and intent of our foundational document. Governmentally speaking, as things currently stand America is a failed nation. As such we are faced with the choice of how to proceed. We could allow things to continue as they have been for the past 150 years and more, or we could decide to make corrections. If we choose the latter, as is apparent with the reelection of Trump for a second term, then we face the question of how to proceed. Given our current state of political reality, it is quite unlikely that there exists any meaningful possibility for making the necessary adjustments working within the normal delimiters of the system. That is because the system is so very broken. This fact then narrows our choices to "do nothing" and "take extraordinary measures". The latter carries huge risk, but is the only way that holds any reasonable chances of succeeding. And so we can wring our hands and do nothing because of the grave risks associated with extraordinary action, in which case we as a nation are as good as dead, or we can take extraordinary action, and bear the risks like men rather as shrinking violets. The worst that can happen in the latter case is that we meet with failure and are doomed the same as in the case where we default. The fact that the extraordinary measures being taken by Trump are, for many, very scary is good. Not only should they be scary, they should be terrifying for everyone. It has been our collective failure to BE the "government" which has lead to our currently atrocious circumstance. Let it linger in the hearts of all that we don't ever allow ourselves to fail ourselves again.
    5 replies | 225 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:46 PM
    462 replies | 62135 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:44 PM
    Aged like milk left behind the stove.
    462 replies | 62135 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:06 PM
    https://x.com/NatCon2022/status/1887685742085669021 1887685742085669021
    91 replies | 3202 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:58 PM
    DEI says what?
    91 replies | 3202 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:50 PM
    https://x.com/AntiFeder1776/status/1887982052353654929 1887982052353654929
    88 replies | 1607 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:46 PM
    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1886988219226419711 1886988219226419711
    88 replies | 1607 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:13 PM
    88 replies | 1607 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:04 PM
    Why would I want that hushed up? It's all gotta go, including that. USAID has been funding the NGOs that are replacing Americans and have been since the 1965 Hart Celler Act. I've been ranting and raving about that for decades now...when 25,000 Somalians show up in lower middle class White town in Maine, when 5000 Haitians show up in a small town in Ohio, when invaders get free housing in Brunswick, it's these NGOs that are responsible. No one, other than lone voices like the Paul's or O'Donnell or Massie or Birchers have ever touched this program.
    88 replies | 1607 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:29 PM
    It's obvious they would have never had time to plan for that many agents to be there, unless the entire event had been planed in advance.
    783 replies | 90027 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:36 AM
    88 replies | 1607 view(s)
  • asurfaholic's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:33 AM
    Debunked as far as I know.
    32 replies | 1300 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:21 AM
    88 replies | 1607 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:07 AM
    Ok so this generous offer is for Trump to be in charge, but not offering any US dollars? Very generous offer LOL
    77 replies | 791 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:14 AM
    https://x.com/i/status/1887537336189395425 1887537336189395425
    3163 replies | 441011 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:13 AM
    Psalm 51:1-2 Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy lovingkindness: according unto the multitude of thy tender mercies blot out my transgressions. Wash me throughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin.
    3079 replies | 475737 view(s)
More Activity

3 Visitor Messages

  1. I appreciate the question! I put Ted Cruz in my top 3 in the Senate under the criteria "Constitutional Conservative". Do you have something of evidence he is willing to ignore "The War Powers Act of 1973 (Pub.L. 93-148), also referred to as the War Powers Resolution, is a resolution of Congress that stated that the President can send troops into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if America is already under attack or serious threat." If his rhetoric on Syria has a Neoconservative narrative he should be held in contempt, & Liberty Lovers must hold him accountable! Do you have the entire content of when he made this statement "Ted Cruz advocating going in to destroy chemical weapons in Syria"? If So, Please email it DonVolaric@Comcast.net
  2. View Conversation
    So, just out of curiosity, and I don't usually judge people based on their associations, but would you agree with me that Ted Cruz is not a politiican that freedom minded people should be supporting? Why or why not?

    Thanks for your answers in advance
  3. View Conversation
    Don, what's your reaction to people like Ted Cruz advocating going in to destroy chemical weapons in Syria? Does that remind you of Iraq at all?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About DonVolaric

Basic Information

Age
62
About DonVolaric
Interests:
Offshore Boating, Hockey, Carpentry
Occupation:
Insurance Agency Owner (Health) & other Endevors

Signature


1.The district is guaranteed to go Republican. (YES)
2.The voting Record of the incumbent must be extremely treasonous. (YES)

3.The liberty Challenger must be well seasoned to deliver the message & understand the political game. (YES)
Let’s Focus on our best opportunities, whether its $$$$$$ or Activism! ~ Donate In Liberty, Don Volaric https://secure.piryx.com/donate/la8DvISN/Committee-to-Elect-Don-Volaric/

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
135
Posts Per Day
0.03
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
3
Most Recent Message
08-30-2013 06:26 PM
General Information
Last Activity
02-28-2014 11:09 AM
Join Date
06-08-2013
Referrals
1
Home Page
http://www.votevolaric.com/

108 Friends

  1. AFPVet AFPVet is offline

    Member

    AFPVet
  2. afwjam afwjam is offline

    Member

    afwjam
  3. alucard13mm alucard13mm is offline

    Member

    alucard13mm
  4. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  5. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  6. anaconda anaconda is offline

    Member

    anaconda
  7. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
  8. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  9. Antischism Antischism is offline

    Member

    Antischism
  10. Aratus Aratus is offline

    Member

    Aratus
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 108
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...