• oyarde's Avatar
    Today, 11:52 AM
    To an 8 yr deal . Why would anyone do that ?
    65 replies | 2185 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Today, 11:52 AM
    To an 8 yr deal . Why would anyone do that ?
    65 replies | 2185 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 08:48 AM
    Gracias. Well yes, but more broadly stated, it stems from the basically ratty nature of the mean human being. I'd not characterize it as frustration, though; more like amusement carrying that hint of head-shaking disgust. A very well chosen term, and one I almost never see employed in the way you do so here. Excellent. It carries a host of implications that paint a picture of beings capable of doing for themselves in ways Theye dread in such hands. Powerful thought in the hands of the rabble is the one thing I believe that Theye fear above all things.
    6 replies | 1217 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Today, 08:33 AM
    Not sure anyone is going to convince me that four years of shumer-biden-harris are not going to be worse than truman. We'll see.
    4 replies | 1826 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Today, 08:20 AM
    The fact that any nation views other nations as a threat in this day and age, is all anyone needs to know to come to the correct assessment that we are a species of losers. Is it not bad enough that we have to worry about such matters with individuals and small gangs? That we have to wring our hands over the fact that people now superorganize on national levels... that is the proof that we shall not end well, no matter what happens. The problem isn't communism, or dictatorships. The problem is the human animal, and that animal never changes. I have recently wondered whether that fact is what stands behind this now very obvious push to so-called "transhumanism". It would make very strong sense that Theye would seek to change the fundamental nature of the vastly greater bulk of humanity. Change them so as to become more reliably manageable, which of course necessitates the obviation of our tendency to rebel, regardless of causes and other reasons. The only chances that remain for liberty, so far as I can see, are as follow: A non-scripted reset event occurs, knocking us back to what would essentially become the new stone age. Every nation on the planet is dissolved in terms of what we know as "state governments".
    327 replies | 19225 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    65345 replies | 977444 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 06:33 AM
    Antifa extremists stage plans to burn down Tesla outlets following Twitter bans 'As revenge for suspending violent extremist accounts on Twitter, in Portland are organizing arson attacks on locations tonight,' reported Ngo, who provided screenshots of the calls to action. https://www.rebelnews.com/antifa_plans_arson_tesla_following_twitter_bans Ian Miles Cheong (25 November 2022) Following his takeover of Twitter, “Chief Twit” Elon Musk has quickly begun to address many of the platform’s problems. Musk, who intends for Twitter to be a platform for legal free speech, has moved to crack down on terrorists and violent far-left extremists who have for many years been a fixture on Twitter and used it to organize riots. Now Tesla, which Musk owns, has become the target of violent retaliation by far-left militants angered by the suspension of their accounts. This week, Musk moved to ban a pro-Palestinian “resistance” group called “Jisr Collective,” which promoted and celebrated terrorist acts against Israeli civilians.
    661 replies | 47456 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Today, 06:06 AM
    Was the informant being pd wiit citizens tax dollars ? Reason I ask is I'd have a whole different opinion on it.
    12 replies | 478 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 05:46 AM
    Proverbs 14:5 A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies.
    2291 replies | 259915 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 12:48 AM
    Lying, Hack Elites I Part Of The Problem 934 On this episode of Part Of The Problem Dave and Robbie take a look at the fear caused by obvious questions at the White House, and we look at John Stewart's recent interview with Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton, where he handles them with the softest kid gloves. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IL7Y903S5fI
    390 replies | 92451 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:54 PM
    https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1596597968634642433
    1712 replies | 135662 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:30 PM
    ATTN: Due to the broad overlap in use and purpose, and to reduce clutter under "new post" queues (such as here and here), the "bestest meme thread" has been merged into the "bestest picture thread". In the future, this thread should be used for items that would have been posted to either. Thank you. Pic tax:
    65345 replies | 977444 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:16 PM
    Due to the high quantity and frequency of low-value posts, this thread is being closed.
    3774 replies | 633102 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:14 PM
    I see The Count has been lying low. You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to acptulsa again.
    147 replies | 12816 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:06 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Occam's Banana again.
    147 replies | 12816 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:28 PM
    Of that I have no doubt - but pretending the US fedgov isn't by far the chiefest and most egregious among them is fatuous. Any American politician who expresses concern about the influence of "foreign power" over Twitter who doesn't also express much greater and more immediate concern about the influence of the US government over Twitter is simply not being serious.
    661 replies | 47456 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:53 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to TheTexan again.
    4 replies | 406 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:45 PM
    LOL "impartial"? What's this guy talking about, "impartial"? What's "impartial" got to do with it? :confused:
    11 replies | 649 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:42 PM
    MSM for one...... Probably the most aggressive psych-med goin'...
    12 replies | 823 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:29 PM
    Seems he Bought Twitter for just that purpose.. Also ,on an unrelated note,, He also just made his EV Charge ports available to everyone. Gave away I.P. free to all. Offered it as a National Standard. (Standardization) Good Business..
    661 replies | 47456 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:41 AM
    Yes, I can, and explain it in detail if needed. Bitcoin is still a mystery to me, especially the "mining" of bitcoins. That said: Can anybody give a me a cogent thumbnail explanation of the FTX scandal? Or explain, if crypto currency is so safe, how Sam Bankman, a barely literate swindler of the lowest sort, was able to shift billions of crypto "assets" out of FTX's portfolios into...well...we don't know where it went actually?
    88 replies | 7484 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:49 AM
    To answer the question in the OP, I'd say the answer turns on one's specific definition of "winning". I would also point out that winning could be seen along many differing lines. As for my view on the matter, I tend to take the broades philosophical line, which leads me to the opinion that in the case of Russia v. Ukraine, nobody wins regardless of outcomes. Do the dead give the least damn who "won"? Does "winning" make good all the loss of the living, whether from the kin of the dead, those who've been maimed by the acts of madmen, or the losses of other properties, often to the economic destitution of entire families? What is all this bullshit talk of winning? I see none of that anywhere. The human animal is a rotten beast on the whole. I wish I could say we don't deserve what we're getting and stand to see in the future, but I'd be lying. Seriously now, think for a moment of the broader reality. Even the "winners" lose. They bankrupt themselves economically. They lose countless of their own. Those "in charge" become prisoners of the results for which they had such raging erections pursuant to what they thought they wanted. Consider our presidents - their lives are turned to shit in so many respects, not that I'm shedding even a single tear for any of them. Trump can't even poke Melania in the ass without his secret service agents listening in. I'd rather die in a house fire. We are a net-loser species. Every fantastic gain we contrive with our fabulous creativity is eclipsed by that much and more because of our raving stupidity and wild corruption, neither of which do sufficient numbers of us show any manifest desire to change. As I like to quip, we are our own worst enemies.
    327 replies | 19225 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:45 AM
    What Meds were prescribed.?
    12 replies | 823 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:25 AM
    Matthew 6:13 And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.
    2291 replies | 259915 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    1 replies | 72 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:33 AM
    At some point, counties (or people in general) need to stop caring what they are "allowed" to do, and just do it
    4 replies | 406 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    11-25-2022, 06:55 PM
    California just loves to break the rules by going full retard.
    14 replies | 722 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    130 replies | 4242 view(s)
More Activity

3 Visitor Messages

  1. I appreciate the question! I put Ted Cruz in my top 3 in the Senate under the criteria "Constitutional Conservative". Do you have something of evidence he is willing to ignore "The War Powers Act of 1973 (Pub.L. 93-148), also referred to as the War Powers Resolution, is a resolution of Congress that stated that the President can send troops into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if America is already under attack or serious threat." If his rhetoric on Syria has a Neoconservative narrative he should be held in contempt, & Liberty Lovers must hold him accountable! Do you have the entire content of when he made this statement "Ted Cruz advocating going in to destroy chemical weapons in Syria"? If So, Please email it DonVolaric@Comcast.net
  2. View Conversation
    So, just out of curiosity, and I don't usually judge people based on their associations, but would you agree with me that Ted Cruz is not a politiican that freedom minded people should be supporting? Why or why not?

    Thanks for your answers in advance
  3. View Conversation
    Don, what's your reaction to people like Ted Cruz advocating going in to destroy chemical weapons in Syria? Does that remind you of Iraq at all?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About DonVolaric

Basic Information

Age
60
About DonVolaric
Interests:
Offshore Boating, Hockey, Carpentry
Occupation:
Insurance Agency Owner (Health) & other Endevors

Signature


1.The district is guaranteed to go Republican. (YES)
2.The voting Record of the incumbent must be extremely treasonous. (YES)

3.The liberty Challenger must be well seasoned to deliver the message & understand the political game. (YES)
Let’s Focus on our best opportunities, whether its $$$$$$ or Activism! ~ Donate In Liberty, Don Volaric https://secure.piryx.com/donate/la8DvISN/Committee-to-Elect-Don-Volaric/

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
135
Posts Per Day
0.04
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
3
Most Recent Message
08-30-2013 06:26 PM
General Information
Last Activity
02-28-2014 11:09 AM
Join Date
06-08-2013
Referrals
1
Home Page
http://www.votevolaric.com/

108 Friends

  1. AFPVet AFPVet is offline

    Member

    AFPVet
  2. afwjam afwjam is offline

    Member

    afwjam
  3. alucard13mm alucard13mm is offline

    Member

    alucard13mm
  4. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  5. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  6. anaconda anaconda is offline

    Member

    anaconda
  7. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
  8. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  9. Antischism Antischism is offline

    Member

    Antischism
  10. Aratus Aratus is offline

    Member

    Aratus
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 108
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...