Tab Content
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-20-2019, 09:46 AM
    Israel itself starting to bomb yemen, of all places, would be the most random thing ever. Your beliefs are not rooted in reality.
    74 replies | 2427 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-20-2019, 09:44 AM
    I have long since won the "debate." dannno and co. have done nothing besides strawman and misrepresent the facts on this topic, like just about every single other topic.
    74 replies | 2427 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-20-2019, 09:42 AM
    Did you even read any of my posts in this thread, including the one you responded to? It really doesn't seem like it
    74 replies | 2427 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-17-2019, 01:50 PM
    The US is not currently involved in Yemen due to Israel, it's due to Saudi Arabia. That's why as of now, that language is absolutely meaningless. If Israel decided to start bombing yemen too in the future, and wanted US help, then that clause would be important.
    74 replies | 2427 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-17-2019, 01:44 PM
    You are the rightwing embodiment of the idiotic "leftist" media and politicians who cry exclusively about Trump's mean tweets while ignoring his abhorrent policies. I'm truly sorry that my post was not kind and well-mannered enough for your liking, but I didn't think it would distract you so much from the actual content of the post, in which I absolutely destroyed your ideological compatriot, danno. And I know you have made it abundantly clear in the past few years that you are incapable of complex thoughts, but this may be a new low. "And no" is in response to the accusation dannno made, saying that "If Trump had signed it as an Executive Order, you people would have pointed out the same thing. But you are only interested in bashing Trump.(referring to the existence of pro-israel rhetoric in the bill)" which I had made abundantly clear in the very next sentence when I typed: "I would not point out meaningless language in the bill "we support Israel and Jews" to use to bash Trump if he signed the bill." Learn to read before trying to dissect people's posts, jeez
    74 replies | 2427 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-14-2019, 10:42 AM
    oh no!! Poor Trump is going to fall into the trap he laid for himself
    9 replies | 354 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-07-2019, 10:57 AM
    So you are claiming that the US infant mortality rate isn't as low as it could be, due to vaccines... when the obvious real answer is due to many women in the US not having adequate access to health care, which is not the case in the other countries, because they all have oogity boogity public health care systems in which everyone has access to necessary health care.
    21 replies | 709 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-03-2019, 09:00 AM
    True, but this bill was already passed a long time ago, it would have to be repealed to cease military action against Al-qaeda This new bill was not great, as it did very little, but passing the bill was clearly the right choice, not vetoing it. The text of the bill did mention that the hostilities are between houthis against SA. (also SA backed forces on the ground who are mostly Al-qaeda folks, but that of course wasnt mentioned)
    74 replies | 2427 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-03-2019, 08:36 AM
    God you are stupid as fuck. We are already strongly aligned with Israel. The text does not commit US forces to any conflict in which Israel is involved, it only reaffirms the already existing US commitment to fighting on behalf of Israel and Zionists, which is an idea held dear by your favorite president, and every president before him. But especially your favorite president. There were no policy directives regarding Israel contained within the bill. It was "debunked as totally ineffective" What the fuck are you talking about? It would at the very least stop the US from helping Saudis pick targets and helping them refuel their aircraft. Unfortunately, no, it wouldn't stop the sale of our weapons to them. We can thank your favorite president for that. And no, I'm not a fucking dumbass, like you are. I would not point out meaningless language in the bill "we support Israel and Jews" to use to bash Trump if he signed the bill. The only reason that language even exists in the bill is to appease the 80 IQ republicans, like Trump and every other politician you support, who have an undying commitment to supporting Israel. Would signing this bill make Trump a good president on foreign policy? Nope, he would still be terrible. But it would be one small step in the right direction, but apparently you prefer the continuation of US support for radical Islam, i.e. the Saudi regime.
    74 replies | 2427 view(s)
  • Influenza's Avatar
    05-01-2019, 01:26 PM
    Rand didn't even call out Trump directly on his vetoing of the Yemen bill. Obviously, if Rand actually did something meaningful like that, he would be unable to continue doing retarded activities like playing golf with a low IQ compulsive liar whose most notable accomplishments so far into his presidency involve doing exactly what his donors tell him to do.
    74 replies | 2427 view(s)
No More Results

3 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    God's Word is compelling, only if you read it with understanding. That's the start of wisdom.
  2. View Conversation
    "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."
    Hebrews 11:1 | KJV
  3. View Conversation
    It's never too late to turn from your wicked ways.

    I will keep you in her prayers.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About Influenza

Basic Information


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
12-28-2018 03:16 PM
General Information
Last Activity
05-20-2019 10:09 AM
Join Date

1 Friend

  1. Lamp Lamp is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1





  • 08:44 AM - Hidden







Page 1 of 40 12311 ... LastLast










Page 1 of 40 12311 ... LastLast