Yesterday, 02:59 PM
I'm not sure what's confusing. I'm trying to agree with you. I guess I'm the one confused by your argument that peddling debunked videos about cat eating Haitians and going on meet the press and claiming that you "created" the story (when we all know J.D. Vance didn't), is somehow productive or not divisive or whatever it is that you're trying to say. So please...unconfuse me.
Edit: This is the word salad I'm trying to parse:
Whether stories are "verified" or "unverified" has little if anything to do with whether they also "bring people together" or "pull people apart".
"Verified" stories can "pull people apart" - and "unverified" ones can "bring people together".
(And that's not even getting into the questions of what "verified" really even means in the first place, which standards of "verification" ought to be applied to which stories under which circumstances, and so forth.)
Connect With Us