Tab Content
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 11:54 AM
    Apparently it is beyond you to distinguish between the government and the people running it. The fact (and it is indeed a fact) that the sanctions were not against the country and/or the populace doesn't mean a damned thing to you. You are now literally hallucinating a fictional reality in order to avoid the truth of the matter, which is that your beloved socialism always ends up with the socialists in charge looting the populace. FFS, Chavez's daughter is now far and away the wealthiest person in the country. Obama put the sanctions into place to try to prevent specific individuals from taking their loot and fleeing to America while avoiding broader sanctions against the country which would harm the populace. This just yet another entirely predictable failure of socialism, and face it: you were wrong again. There were no sanctions against Venezuela. Long paragraphs of speculations won't change that.
    18 replies | 227 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 10:56 AM
    How does what religion you happen to be, make you a "person of color"?
    5 replies | 86 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Today, 10:48 AM
    It's Michigan.
    5 replies | 86 view(s)
  • jkr's Avatar
    Today, 10:20 AM
    i WONDER WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF I CHANGED... This is how we get SATANIST law in the US "Absolutely" a blue SATANIST wave coming, says Michigan congressional candidate Rashida Tlaib https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rashida...onal-district/
    5 replies | 86 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 08:58 AM
    NRA, GOA, JPFO and New Hampshire Firearms Coalition...a member of all four.
    10 replies | 114 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 08:07 AM
    Trump cancels Singapore summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/24/trump-says-singapore-summit-with-north-korea-leader-kim-is-cancelled-.html President Donald Trump has canceled his historic summit in Singapore with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un next month. The meeting, which would have marked the first face-to-face encounter between a sitting U.S. president and a North Korean leader, was set for June 12. Mike Calia | Michael_Calia Published 21 Mins Ago Updated 3 Mins Ago
    23 replies | 226 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:01 AM
    LOL, so, in this hand we have the Race card, the Muslim card, the Qu eer card and the Pervert card. Which one beats all?
    21 replies | 399 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 07:00 AM
    Speculation has been that testing had destroyed the site already anyway, so this particular action would be basically propaganda.
    5 replies | 106 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 06:59 AM
    North Korea ‘will blow up its nuclear test site within hours’ - Daily Mail https://apple.news/AoyhbRjfjRd6QdG7hPVHsAw North Korea has dismantled its nuclear test site, in a planned move portrayed by the isolated regime as a goodwill gesture ahead of a potential summit next month with the US. It is not known to what extent the northeastern Punggye-ri facility has been demolished, but foreign journalists invited to witness the destruction described a series of 'huge explosions'.
    5 replies | 106 view(s)
  • angelatc's Avatar
    Today, 06:44 AM
    And charity should come from individuals, not the CIA. But their leader won't allow that. This is exactly why socialism always fails in reality. On paper, it's a great plan. In reality, the psychopaths have all the power. The allegation that this is a CIA orchestrated failure is as crazy as Firestarter though.
    18 replies | 227 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 399 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    4 replies | 66 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 06:08 AM
    I have a couple spares, I'll send you one. I also have an NRA overnight bag.
    10 replies | 114 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Today, 05:40 AM
    It would go well with your giant panda rug.
    4 replies | 66 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Today, 05:29 AM
    Danke replied to a thread Danke, do something in Open Discussion
    I might just have to put an NRA sticker on my rollerboard bag.
    10 replies | 114 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 04:18 AM
    Delayed two hours at IAH last week after operations overfilled an A-319 with fuel for a short haul to MSY, thus exceeding MGLW. Then, they took away my premium seat and bumped me back to the last row, middle seat, without permission or advance notice. Now, I get to read this: WTF, Rickshaw Airlines? :mad: United Airlines CEO: No Regrets, Cutting Ties with NRA Was Personal
    10 replies | 114 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Today, 01:42 AM
    If you mean the gospels, not likely. The scribes of the Gospel narrative would've been dead by the time the Gospels were written down. Mark wasn't written till ~40 AD, Matthew ~70, etc. We also have multiple authentic copies of each Gospel.
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 01:22 AM
    You know, I was going to write out a reply to this, but there's just way too much to get into. Whole books have been written on this topic, so it's not something that we can adequately cover in a few paragraphs. I mentioned this before, but I'll say it again. There was a big division in early Christianity, between vegetarians and meat eaters. There is plenty of very compelling evidence that Jesus' brother James and a number of the disciples were vegetarian. Since the student can't be greater than the master, I think it would be very odd if Jesus was not a vegetarian, and I believe that for a number of reasons. You may think this is crazy, but it is argued that certain passages were inserted in order to portray Jesus as carnivorous. That wouldn't surprise me at all, especially when the Bible itself states that lying scribes changed things. And when you consider that the heart of God – a heart of love, mercy and compassion – does not go along with putting ones tastebuds first, above the life of an animal who wants to live. But again, there's way too much to this topic, and we are already way way way off the original topic.
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 12:48 AM
    Swordsmyth, you're much smarter than this. Let's make this as simple as possible. Which one of these is more demonic: a) exploitation, violence, torture and killing, for selfish reasons… Or b) loving, valuing, and protecting all life? Please answer honestly.
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 12:43 AM
    Swordsmyth, I've noticed that you are either ignoring or quickly glossing over numerous points I've brought up, but then you keep throwing up the same handful of scriptures that meat eaters always use. If you're not going to take much time to address the things I've said, then I'm not going to take the time to go over each of these points you brought up. There are certain things that are undeniable. God commands us to be merciful. God commands us to love and treat others the way we want to be treated. You can argue that he meant that only for humans… But God created the animals too, they live here with us. We treat our dogs and cats like members of our family, we love and cherish them. Why would you apply love, kindness and the golden rule to your beloved dog, but not to another animal who is equally as intelligent and emotional? The Bible states that God's mercy extends to all creation. So why do we limit our mercy only to cats and dogs?
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 12:35 AM
    I'm sure you know that it's logical fallacy to dismiss a claim based on a person who states it. And that was just one example, the article talks about a number of early Christians who wrote the same thing, including Josephus and others. Not to get too off topic here, but many people do not know that there was a big division in early Christianity, between vegetarians and meat eaters. We know who won out. But again, we're getting into other topics… And since this originally was a thread on eggs, I'm not going to get into all that here and now.
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Today, 12:18 AM
    We're really not though. In fact, that may the reason (or one of the reasons) that after the flood, the lifespan of man went down from several hundreds of years, to only 120 years, and then down from there. And now, things like cancer, heart disease and other illnesses are near epidemics… We are clearly not living the way we should be living. Perhaps we should go back to how God originally designed us? Also, here's a video to watch:
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Today, 12:08 AM
    Lily, the Montanists were heretics and their heresy (Montanism) has been denounced by the entire Christian world for centuries. https://orthodoxwiki.org/Montanism
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:40 PM
    Do you really believe that God would endorse killing and meat-eating shortly after saying the exact opposite? God does not change, if He designed us to live in peace and harmony and nonviolence… Why assume that all the sudden he did a complete turnaround? First of all, it was an offering or gift, not quite the same thing as the animal sacrifices you have mind. Secondly, the word that you are hinging your entire argument on, the word translated as "fat", does not automatically mean what you (and many others who grew up eating meat) assume it means. I'm going to post an excerpt from an article on this passage, and I will bold some of the pertinent parts. However, some early Christians such as the Montanists apparently thought Abel offered the dairy products of his flock: In the second century the African Montanists were sometimes called the "Artotyrites" because they added cheese, instead of wine, to the bread in the Eucharist on the ground that the Aquarii, and first men offered the fruits both of the earth and of their flocks (Gen. iv. 3, 4). http://www.wpl.lib.oh.us/AntiSaloon/print/wine.html
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
  • lilymc's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:44 PM
    That is one study, I could show you hundreds of studies that show meat is linked to numerous health problems. Also keep in mind that many of those "studies" which say animal products are healthy are funded by those very industries. Also, it should be pointed out that the protein or other nutrients that you can get from animal flesh you can also get from much healthier, cruelty-free plant-based foods. In fact, that is where the dead animal got his protein from… Plants. So you're getting those nutrients second-hand. Why not just cut out the middleman and go straight to the original source? I know the answer to that. :) Because we all grew up eating hamburgers, steaks, etc.… And we love those things, and it is extremely hard – incomprehensible, even – to consider giving those things up. But actually, it is not hard at all when you have that lightbulb "aha" moment after seeing the reality of what the animals go through. The horror of it, to the point of it being almost diabolical. And what for? Not for survival, but to satisfy our selfish personal desires.
    71 replies | 569 view(s)
More Activity

105 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    dupe
  2. View Conversation
    Theo!!!!! hugs!!!
  3. View Conversation
    I just started looking at the Constitution Party platform since you recommended it awhile back. There are some good things in it, but there are also some concessions to statism that I think are dangerous despite the fact that I'm moving away from strict anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. They support regulation of "obscenity", which isn't really defined, they support some drug restrictions, and they are careful to show their respect for agents of our currently illegitimate state (veterans), as well as condemning attempts to cut their benefits despite the fact that they are paid out of our pockets and for participating in unjust wars for an unjust system.

    The Constitution Party isn't all bad, and I might support some of their candidates, but I don't think there is any party I can support on principle (LP is pro-choice so not an option) I respect strict theonomy even though I'm not sure I agree with it yet. I don't think anybody believes what I'm starting to believe these days.
  4. View Conversation
    My vm from June 15
  5. View Conversation
    Are you purposely dodging that last one?
  6. View Conversation
    Do you believe that it is possible to ethically justify joining the military or the police in modern day America? Or would you agree with me that it cannot be justified with our country in the state that its currently in? What would be your reasoning for your answer, one way or another?
  7. View Conversation
    We don't have to agree on everything to feel affection for each other and treat each other with dignity and respect!
  8. View Conversation
    Thank you Sir!
  9. View Conversation
    OK, so my question is, with relations to Galatians, how is it that you can call Roman Catholics on this board "brothers" even though they add works to the gospel just like the Judaizers did? How is adding baptism as a requirement in order to be saved any different than adding circumcision as a requirement?
  10. View Conversation
    Out of curiosity, how do you interpret Galatians 1:8-9 and 2 John 9-11?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 105
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
About Theocrat

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Signature


"Diverse weights are an abomination unto the LORD, and a false balance is not good." - Proverbs 20:23

"Federal Reserve-generated increases in money supply cause economic inequality... By the time the increased money supply trickles down to middle- and working-class Americans, the economy is already beset by inflation. So most average Americans see their standard of living decline as a result of Fed-engendered money supply increases." - Dr. Ron Paul

Contact


This Page
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?4634-Theocrat&s=40dd8ea6d0c2568449cd9e2cd71e887e
Instant Messaging

Send an Instant Message to Theocrat Using...

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
9,131
Posts Per Day
2.35
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
105
Most Recent Message
01-31-2016 11:07 AM
General Information
Last Activity
05-22-2018 05:44 AM
Join Date
10-04-2007
Referrals
4

245 Friends

  1. A. Havnes A. Havnes is offline

    Member

    A. Havnes
  2. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  3. AFPVet AFPVet is offline

    Member

    AFPVet
  4. allyinoh allyinoh is offline

    Member

    allyinoh
  5. Alternative 336 Alternative 336 is offline

    Member

    Alternative 336
  6. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  7. ammorris ammorris is offline

    Member

    ammorris
  8. amonasro amonasro is offline

    Member

    amonasro
  9. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  10. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 245
Page 1 of 25 12311 ... LastLast

11-07-2016

  • 08:25 AM - Hidden

06-18-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

10-17-2017


08-19-2017


01-29-2017


01-25-2017


01-18-2017


01-11-2017


01-10-2017


12-20-2016

  • 07:58 PM - Hidden
  • 05:24 PM - Hidden

12-19-2016


12-18-2016


12-16-2016


12-15-2016


12-11-2016


12-07-2016


12-06-2016



Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast