Tab Content
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 11:26 AM
    Considering "superior" justice appointments was their main selling point of Trump in 2016, the cognitive dissonance is hardly surprising. Or was it Kavanaugnitive dissonance?
    45 replies | 732 view(s)
  • Todd's Avatar
    Today, 08:34 AM
    Wheres the biden video of him campaigning and has a senior moment and the press start get ushered away.
    23 replies | 1404 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:59 AM
    So what you're saying is, the Democrats wouldn't be able to make the court more leftist if a Democrat named Trump hadn't made it more leftist. Right?
    45 replies | 732 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 334 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 334 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 334 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 334 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    21 replies | 334 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Today, 07:11 AM
    https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1363249686665187329?s=20 1363249686665187329
    21 replies | 334 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:22 AM
    Lots of great information in this video. Interestingly enough Max brings up the "event 201" simulation that happened October 18, 2019 simulating a coronavirus pandemic. But then he dismisses the idea that COVID-19 was created in a laboratory because he has "seen no evidence of that." What does he call the fact that the NIH funded gain of function research on bat corona viruses and that research was being done in Wuhan which is the epicenter of the virus? Why was that left out of his analysis? But the overarching point is spot on. People say "trust the science", but a college dropout is being all over the Sunday talk shows promoting "science."
    1 replies | 42 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:15 PM
    Looks like you're a prophet when it comes to the SCOTUS.
    37 replies | 2064 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:50 PM
    Irony. Or is that supposed to be satire?
    93 replies | 1711 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:29 PM
    “Service members, Department of Defense civilians and all those who support our mission, are entitled to an environment free of discrimination, hate and harassment.” Frick. Can I sue now for all the harassment I received in the military?
    93 replies | 1711 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:01 PM
    So ehhh... parrot is another gender? :confused:
    93 replies | 1711 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:46 PM
    Not a "Civil case".. a alleged Crime.. a NONEXISTENT CRIME a Fiction.. Made up fantasy. and a Felony.
    45 replies | 732 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:59 PM
    I disagree. He made some absolutely indefensible asinine moves. "I didn't want to cause a panic?" Do you seriously think that didn't cost him any votes? Talking about injecting disinfectant? Letting Fauci be all over the map? Simple Trump win. In January 2020 if he made this speech he would have been difficult to beat. "My fellow Americans. I know what I am about to say may not be well received due to the recent impeachment trial. But we are about to be in a state of emergency. I have received intelligence from Taiwan about a new SARS virus coming out of China but this one may be much worse than the other. Taiwan is locking down its borders but not its economy. We will do the same. All travel to an from the U.S. will be severely limited for the next month. Any Americans abroad please report to the nearest embassy, consulate or military base for 14 day quarantine and testing. We will keep re-evaluating this situation as we go along. I'm asking Congress for immediate emergency spending to procure protective equipment for hospital workers and first responders and to ramp up on shore manufacturing of the same. Make your on mask if you wish. The plans will be on the Whitehouse website. I want a clean bill. If congress tries to put any earmarks in this bill I will veto it. Please call your members of congress and tell them not to do that. We will put our best minds not only into discovering pharmucutical treatments and a possible vaccine for this new virus but also put forward a clearinghouse of which already available treatments and natural remedies may be effective. The type of virus, a coronavirus, has been known to the medical community for many years even though this is a new variation." Yeah. That MIGHT not of worked, but it MIGHT have. The fact that Trump managed to keep things close despite possibly being the worst presidential candidate in my lifetime tells me how weak Biden was.
    45 replies | 732 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:42 PM
    Why thank you! Of course I am sure AOC and the most extreme leftists supports their followers having conversations promoting the "Green New Deal" or whatever....to a point. But for them, and Stef, there is a point to go cultist. At least that's my impression after having watched again the Joe Rogan interview with Stef on the subject. Here is where Stef goes off the cult end. Joe Rogan asks him about cutting people off who agree with the state and think that it's okay to have a government and Stef says "yes" and makes the phoney argument is that if you're going to be principled "at some point personal relationships have to become part of the equation." Now here's where I call that argument phoney. It's one thing to make personal relationships part of the equation by accepting the fact that other people might cut you off for having a difference of opinion. Jesus Himself was quit clear that would happen. But to cut others off because they disagree with you based on some far fetched argument that if they believe in the state "they want you killed?" Yeah...that's kind of ridiculous. No...that's absolutely ridiculous. Consider this. The Ron Paul position on pro-life, which I have adopted as my own, is in essence a "statist" position. If states are allowed to have abortion laws, then they can use force to prevent doctors from performing abortions. There's no way around it. Of course you can promote life by trying to change the culture (and I do). But that doesn't require a repeal of Roe v Wade. So...technically Stef would want my son to "defoo" me at some point. Maybe it's years and years down the road, after you've tried every argument you can think of etc. But I follow a higher calling. "Whatsoever it is that you would that men would do to you, do ye also unto them." I wouldn't want someone to cut me off just because I have a different view than them on which party to vote for or abortion or LGBTQIA or whatever. We ought to be able to disagree indefinitely about a whole host of issues and still be friends or at least family. Until there is a clear and present danger...until someone is literally turning names into the Stazi on the left or the Pinochet police on the right to be "disappeared", there is no justification from top down, bottom up, left wing, right wing, crowd sourced or one on one cancel culture. That brings me to another problem with Stef's video. He acted like only socialists disappeared people. Pinochet was no socialist. A death squad is a death squad. LOL. Funny!
    45 replies | 873 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:26 PM
    As long as there is no violation of the antitrust laws that's true. What Farcebook, Twisteder and Ghougle did by sharing information on who to deplatform is a violation of the antitrust laws. Also just because something can fall under the definition of capitalism doesn't make it right. It was wrong for country stations to quit playing the Dixie Chicks. And no matter how dannno tried to differentiate it, that's still top down cancel culture. But who cares if it's bottom up? The attack on Chik-Fil-A for having donated to the family research council was absolutely bottom up cancel culture. I don't recall any conservatives saying "Well I guess that's all well and good. Free market and all." Of course Chik-Fil-A made record profits after being "cancelled" but they still caved and apologized for something that shouldn't have required an apology. Anyway, back to the Dixie Chicks. It's funny that the same country stations that cancelled them for saying they were ashamed of Bush for having started a war with Iraq still largely rallied around Trump for telling Jeb Bush "Your brother did not protect this country on 9/11." What's the difference? I'm sure people on the right will have some BS excuse like "Well they were on foreign soil" or "Well Bush was still president" or something equally as stupid. The truth is Trump had already earned his conservative bones by saying Mexico was sending rapists, along with "some good people," over the border and he was going to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. I guess political correctness goes both ways. Michael Savage also got away with calling Iraq "the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history", after supporting the Iraq war and slamming Ron Paul in 2008 for being against it. But again he had earned his conservative bones. The Dixie Chicks first foray into politics was critical of Bush who was still loved by the useful idiots in the GOP at that time.
    45 replies | 873 view(s)
  • Todd's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:20 PM
    If it makes you happy I agreed with his video. He used to make some sense and I still find some of his quotes on gun rights spot on. It isn't a secret that he started abandoning alot of his principles with Trump fever got him.
    45 replies | 873 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:47 PM
    You left out "The president was compromised." Seriously if Trump hadn't been such a douche the election wouldn't have been close enough to steal. What kind of person tells Bob Woodward, of all people "I knew back in January it was really bad but I didn't want to cause a panic?" Like...the panic wasn't going to happen anyway?
    45 replies | 732 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:44 PM
    Gotcha! And I agree. Agorism FTW!
    45 replies | 732 view(s)
  • Todd's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:44 PM
    Kinda like Stefan's relevance to anything consistent with liberty then.
    45 replies | 873 view(s)
  • Todd's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:38 PM
    Oh..is Stefan off the Trump train now and becoming an anarchists again. :rolleyes:
    45 replies | 873 view(s)
  • pcosmar's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:38 PM
    Lawyers have never done me any good.. Wrap your head around this if you can. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_fiction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_possession
    45 replies | 732 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:25 PM
    LOL. So now victory is the fact that the porn star will only have been paid twice (once for doing the deed and once to remain silent) rather than 3 times? Someone explain to me again why this isn't all about Trump?
    45 replies | 732 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:18 PM
    This guy's a real winner. Where's it say that in the Constitution? You know what it does say, ya dizzy bastard? That you have an absolute right, and government shall make no law prohibiting, your ability to speak, to write, to say and to gather with others, whenever, whatever and wherever you want.
    93 replies | 1711 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:10 PM
    "Gay Marriage" has nothing to do with the libertarian leanings it's name would suggest. It is (was) a culture cudgel designed to silence opposition to the next waves of weirdosexualism now coming down the pike, culminating in two things: the normalization of pre pubescent pedophilia and "snuff" sex, whether filmed or carried out in real life. I say "was" because that battle is over, chalked up as another decisive win for the Marxist mob.
    51 replies | 3400 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:01 PM
    Color me shocked.
    37 replies | 2064 view(s)
More Activity

105 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    dupe
  2. View Conversation
    Theo!!!!! hugs!!!
  3. View Conversation
    I just started looking at the Constitution Party platform since you recommended it awhile back. There are some good things in it, but there are also some concessions to statism that I think are dangerous despite the fact that I'm moving away from strict anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. They support regulation of "obscenity", which isn't really defined, they support some drug restrictions, and they are careful to show their respect for agents of our currently illegitimate state (veterans), as well as condemning attempts to cut their benefits despite the fact that they are paid out of our pockets and for participating in unjust wars for an unjust system.

    The Constitution Party isn't all bad, and I might support some of their candidates, but I don't think there is any party I can support on principle (LP is pro-choice so not an option) I respect strict theonomy even though I'm not sure I agree with it yet. I don't think anybody believes what I'm starting to believe these days.
  4. View Conversation
    My vm from June 15
  5. View Conversation
    Are you purposely dodging that last one?
  6. View Conversation
    Do you believe that it is possible to ethically justify joining the military or the police in modern day America? Or would you agree with me that it cannot be justified with our country in the state that its currently in? What would be your reasoning for your answer, one way or another?
  7. View Conversation
    We don't have to agree on everything to feel affection for each other and treat each other with dignity and respect!
  8. View Conversation
    Thank you Sir!
  9. View Conversation
    OK, so my question is, with relations to Galatians, how is it that you can call Roman Catholics on this board "brothers" even though they add works to the gospel just like the Judaizers did? How is adding baptism as a requirement in order to be saved any different than adding circumcision as a requirement?
  10. View Conversation
    Out of curiosity, how do you interpret Galatians 1:8-9 and 2 John 9-11?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 105
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
About Theocrat

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Signature


"Diverse weights are an abomination unto the LORD, and a false balance is not good." - Proverbs 20:23

"Lowering interest rates punishes people for saving, thus encouraging consumers and businesses to spend every penny they make...The Federal Reserve’s inflationary policies harm the average American by eroding the dollar’s purchasing power." - Dr. Ron Paul

Contact


This Page
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?4634-Theocrat&s=136ae0ce99ec8b49ae7d78d5005026ce
Instant Messaging

Send an Instant Message to Theocrat Using...

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
9,406
Posts Per Day
1.92
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
105
Most Recent Message
01-31-2016 11:07 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 06:40 PM
Join Date
10-04-2007
Referrals
4

244 Friends

  1. A. Havnes A. Havnes is offline

    Member

    A. Havnes
  2. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  3. AFPVet AFPVet is offline

    Member

    AFPVet
  4. allyinoh allyinoh is offline

    Member

    allyinoh
  5. Alternative 336 Alternative 336 is offline

    Member

    Alternative 336
  6. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  7. ammorris ammorris is offline

    Member

    ammorris
  8. amonasro amonasro is offline

    Member

    amonasro
  9. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  10. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 244
Page 1 of 25 12311 ... LastLast

02-04-2021


03-18-2020


03-08-2020

  • 04:08 PM - Hidden

03-04-2020


02-27-2020


02-19-2020


11-07-2016

  • 08:25 AM - Hidden

06-18-2016


Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast

02-18-2021


02-17-2021


12-28-2020


12-18-2020


06-01-2020


05-08-2020


05-07-2020


04-27-2020


04-17-2020


04-11-2020


04-10-2020


04-05-2020



Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast