Theocrat
Member

Considering "superior" justice appointments was their main selling point of Trump in 2016, the cognitive dissonance is hardly surprising. Or was it Kavanaugnitive dissonance?

Wheres the biden video of him campaigning and has a senior moment and the press start get ushered away.

So what you're saying is, the Democrats wouldn't be able to make the court more leftist if a Democrat named Trump hadn't made it more leftist. Right?

https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1363249686665187329?s=20 1363249686665187329

Looks like you're a prophet when it comes to the SCOTUS.

Irony. Or is that supposed to be satire?

“Service members, Department of Defense civilians and all those who support our mission, are entitled to an environment free of discrimination, hate and harassment.” Frick. Can I sue now for all the harassment I received in the military?

So ehhh... parrot is another gender? :confused:

Not a "Civil case".. a alleged Crime.. a NONEXISTENT CRIME a Fiction.. Made up fantasy. and a Felony.

I disagree. He made some absolutely indefensible asinine moves. "I didn't want to cause a panic?" Do you seriously think that didn't cost him any votes? Talking about injecting disinfectant? Letting Fauci be all over the map? Simple Trump win. In January 2020 if he made this speech he would have been difficult to beat. "My fellow Americans. I know what I am about to say may not be well received due to the recent impeachment trial. But we are about to be in a state of emergency. I have received intelligence from Taiwan about a new SARS virus coming out of China but this one may be much worse than the other. Taiwan is locking down its borders but not its economy. We will do the same. All travel to an from the U.S. will be severely limited for the next month. Any Americans abroad please report to the nearest embassy, consulate or military base for 14 day quarantine and testing. We will keep re-evaluating this situation as we go along. I'm asking Congress for immediate emergency spending to procure protective equipment for hospital workers and first responders and to ramp up on shore manufacturing of the same. Make your on mask if you wish. The plans will be on the Whitehouse website. I want a clean bill. If congress tries to put any earmarks in this bill I will veto it. Please call your members of congress and tell them not to do that. We will put our best minds not only into discovering pharmucutical treatments and a possible vaccine for this new virus but also put forward a clearinghouse of which already available treatments and natural remedies may be effective. The type of virus, a coronavirus, has been known to the medical community for many years even though this is a new variation." Yeah. That MIGHT not of worked, but it MIGHT have. The fact that Trump managed to keep things close despite possibly being the worst presidential candidate in my lifetime tells me how weak Biden was.

Why thank you! Of course I am sure AOC and the most extreme leftists supports their followers having conversations promoting the "Green New Deal" or whatever....to a point. But for them, and Stef, there is a point to go cultist. At least that's my impression after having watched again the Joe Rogan interview with Stef on the subject. Here is where Stef goes off the cult end. Joe Rogan asks him about cutting people off who agree with the state and think that it's okay to have a government and Stef says "yes" and makes the phoney argument is that if you're going to be principled "at some point personal relationships have to become part of the equation." Now here's where I call that argument phoney. It's one thing to make personal relationships part of the equation by accepting the fact that other people might cut you off for having a difference of opinion. Jesus Himself was quit clear that would happen. But to cut others off because they disagree with you based on some far fetched argument that if they believe in the state "they want you killed?" Yeah...that's kind of ridiculous. No...that's absolutely ridiculous. Consider this. The Ron Paul position on pro-life, which I have adopted as my own, is in essence a "statist" position. If states are allowed to have abortion laws, then they can use force to prevent doctors from performing abortions. There's no way around it. Of course you can promote life by trying to change the culture (and I do). But that doesn't require a repeal of Roe v Wade. So...technically Stef would want my son to "defoo" me at some point. Maybe it's years and years down the road, after you've tried every argument you can think of etc. But I follow a higher calling. "Whatsoever it is that you would that men would do to you, do ye also unto them." I wouldn't want someone to cut me off just because I have a different view than them on which party to vote for or abortion or LGBTQIA or whatever. We ought to be able to disagree indefinitely about a whole host of issues and still be friends or at least family. Until there is a clear and present danger...until someone is literally turning names into the Stazi on the left or the Pinochet police on the right to be "disappeared", there is no justification from top down, bottom up, left wing, right wing, crowd sourced or one on one cancel culture. That brings me to another problem with Stef's video. He acted like only socialists disappeared people. Pinochet was no socialist. A death squad is a death squad. LOL. Funny!

As long as there is no violation of the antitrust laws that's true. What Farcebook, Twisteder and Ghougle did by sharing information on who to deplatform is a violation of the antitrust laws. Also just because something can fall under the definition of capitalism doesn't make it right. It was wrong for country stations to quit playing the Dixie Chicks. And no matter how dannno tried to differentiate it, that's still top down cancel culture. But who cares if it's bottom up? The attack on Chik-Fil-A for having donated to the family research council was absolutely bottom up cancel culture. I don't recall any conservatives saying "Well I guess that's all well and good. Free market and all." Of course Chik-Fil-A made record profits after being "cancelled" but they still caved and apologized for something that shouldn't have required an apology. Anyway, back to the Dixie Chicks. It's funny that the same country stations that cancelled them for saying they were ashamed of Bush for having started a war with Iraq still largely rallied around Trump for telling Jeb Bush "Your brother did not protect this country on 9/11." What's the difference? I'm sure people on the right will have some BS excuse like "Well they were on foreign soil" or "Well Bush was still president" or something equally as stupid. The truth is Trump had already earned his conservative bones by saying Mexico was sending rapists, along with "some good people," over the border and he was going to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. I guess political correctness goes both ways. Michael Savage also got away with calling Iraq "the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history", after supporting the Iraq war and slamming Ron Paul in 2008 for being against it. But again he had earned his conservative bones. The Dixie Chicks first foray into politics was critical of Bush who was still loved by the useful idiots in the GOP at that time.

If it makes you happy I agreed with his video. He used to make some sense and I still find some of his quotes on gun rights spot on. It isn't a secret that he started abandoning alot of his principles with Trump fever got him.

You left out "The president was compromised." Seriously if Trump hadn't been such a douche the election wouldn't have been close enough to steal. What kind of person tells Bob Woodward, of all people "I knew back in January it was really bad but I didn't want to cause a panic?" Like...the panic wasn't going to happen anyway?

Gotcha! And I agree. Agorism FTW!

Kinda like Stefan's relevance to anything consistent with liberty then.

Oh..is Stefan off the Trump train now and becoming an anarchists again. :rolleyes:

Lawyers have never done me any good.. Wrap your head around this if you can. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_fiction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_possession

LOL. So now victory is the fact that the porn star will only have been paid twice (once for doing the deed and once to remain silent) rather than 3 times? Someone explain to me again why this isn't all about Trump?

This guy's a real winner. Where's it say that in the Constitution? You know what it does say, ya dizzy bastard? That you have an absolute right, and government shall make no law prohibiting, your ability to speak, to write, to say and to gather with others, whenever, whatever and wherever you want.

"Gay Marriage" has nothing to do with the libertarian leanings it's name would suggest. It is (was) a culture cudgel designed to silence opposition to the next waves of weirdosexualism now coming down the pike, culminating in two things: the normalization of pre pubescent pedophilia and "snuff" sex, whether filmed or carried out in real life. I say "was" because that battle is over, chalked up as another decisive win for the Marxist mob.

Color me shocked.