Tab Content
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 10:02 AM
    Why? And do you mean people in general, or us in particular? Like you said, these things aren't news to us (in particular), they're receipts. We (in particular) are way ahead of the curve. Why shouldn't people who are way ahead of the curve be already inquiring about whether any heads will roll?
    2 replies | 37 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 09:35 AM
    He's a lap dog, yapping in frustration at cats because he's not big enough to chase us up a tree somewhere. He thinks joining the MAGA Cult gives him the Authority of the Crowd, and he's trying to exercise that authoritay. That's what makes him think he's entitled (like a Karen) to have his wild flights of illogic slide by without challenge (like a Karen). Remember when Obamamessiah Cultists did the exact same thing? They didn't impress us either.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 09:26 AM
    If the queeer cult wins this battle, what they have planned to normalize next will absolutely make your skin crawl.
    465 replies | 62185 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 09:23 AM
    100 percent.
    465 replies | 62185 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    124 replies | 18534 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 08:22 AM
    acptulsa replied to a thread USAID Exposed in U.S. Political News
    Not unless we get more than a study, and not unless we get more than some Soros-funded professional whiner giving us the pleasure of seeing their head explode on air. I, for one, am not that cheap, sailor. I'm not that easy. I said I'm keeping that at my leisure. Now that Trump whacked the USAID head, what other heads are going to pop out of the CIA Whack-A-Mole machine? Will any of the bad apples in the CIA take the buyout, or is this just a way for them to purge their ranks of good apples? Which of these departments is actually going to close? Which of these criminals is going to get snatched out of their golden parachutes and indicted? How much money will really be saved, and how much of that will escape this fate?
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 08:07 AM
    acptulsa replied to a thread USAID Exposed in U.S. Political News
    That's your problem, not mine. I can be patient. I'm keeping score at my leisure. And I'm not moving anything into the win column unless and until we get something more than another six million dollar, three year government study about it.
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 08:00 AM
    acptulsa replied to a thread USAID Exposed in U.S. Political News
    Good case in point. He commissioned a study? We've already done our homework. There's not a one of us who wouldn't be out to demolish the ATF. A government study is not my idea of substance.
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:52 AM
    Al Qaeda is the CIA, and everyone else here is well informed enough to know it. Al Qaeda is the CIA's way to throw a tantrum when we won't use up enough missiles to necessitate us buying more. You're saying brats should be rewarded for throwing deadly tantrums, whether you know it or not. The DS, which regularly kills Muslims by the thousands, because they want to spend our money on missiles, because some of them have petroleum, because many of us don't much like Arabs anyway so it's an easier sell than (f'rinstance) massacring cute little Thais, is on the same side as the Muslims they seem to be trying to genocide? Now there's some twisted "logic". Are you a man or a pretzel, cultist?
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Today, 07:41 AM
    acptulsa replied to a thread USAID Exposed in U.S. Political News
    Heads are exploding and some find that entirely satisfactory. This is what someone who cares only about style looks like. And here is someone who knows substance when he sees it, and won't settle for less. See the difference, kiddies?
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 01:12 AM
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rand-paul-introduces-legislation-to-return-power-back-in-the-people-s-hands/ar-AA1yzzIS?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=c6a8cb14d61c4a35a53f8f579840f831&ei=10 Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) introduced the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act in the Senate on Thursday. His bill intended to take action to “put power back in the people’s hands instead of the administrative state,” read a press release about the bill. This specifically applies to the current process involving legislation in the government in which regulations go into effect unless explicitly disapproved by Congress. Under Paul’s proposal in the REINS Act, major rules would need to be approved by the legislative branch before going to the president for signature and approval. “The purpose of this Act is to increase accountability for and transparency in the Federal regulatory process,” read the text of the bill. “Section 1 of article I of the Constitution of the United States grants all legislative powers to Congress.” Additionally, Paul’s REINS Act highlighted a recent history of a reduction in oversight and accountability in legislation that is passed by Congress.
    1 replies | 47 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 12:22 AM
    Let's assume absolute proof comes out that the CIA was behind 9/11. Using your logic the war in Iraq was justified because....reasons. You really didn't think that one through.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 12:19 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Snowball again.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:33 PM
    And this is just scratching the surface, and the system is losing it's everfucking mind right now because of it. Wait until the DOGE crew starts making the connection between the "legit" money that is appropriated for things like USAID being used for these nefarious purposes and the "black" money from running drugs and sex and "snuff" trafficking of children and arms dealing and what that money sponsors around the world.
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:22 PM
    By any objective observation, a great deal has already been done. No government action or cessation of action, in and of itself, is going to cure the rot in the soul of our people or heal this land. That is in God's hands. But it can clear the air, root out the corruption, shut down the Fifth Columnists and remove the invaders. As far as the Small Hat Club goes, we're still another generation or two away from addressing that logically.
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:46 PM
    465 replies | 62185 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:44 PM
    Aged like milk left behind the stove.
    465 replies | 62185 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:06 PM
    https://x.com/NatCon2022/status/1887685742085669021 1887685742085669021
    91 replies | 3232 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:58 PM
    DEI says what?
    91 replies | 3232 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:50 PM
    https://x.com/AntiFeder1776/status/1887982052353654929 1887982052353654929
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:46 PM
    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1886988219226419711 1886988219226419711
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:13 PM
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:04 PM
    Why would I want that hushed up? It's all gotta go, including that. USAID has been funding the NGOs that are replacing Americans and have been since the 1965 Hart Celler Act. I've been ranting and raving about that for decades now...when 25,000 Somalians show up in lower middle class White town in Maine, when 5000 Haitians show up in a small town in Ohio, when invaders get free housing in Brunswick, it's these NGOs that are responsible. No one, other than lone voices like the Paul's or O'Donnell or Massie or Birchers have ever touched this program.
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:29 PM
    It's obvious they would have never had time to plan for that many agents to be there, unless the entire event had been planed in advance.
    783 replies | 90039 view(s)
  • ClaytonB's Avatar
    783 replies | 90039 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:48 AM
    :rolleyes: You're just going to keep blithely ignoring the fact that Hamas is Netanyahu's false flag army aren't you? ^This.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • A. Havnes's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:33 AM
    This is where my two problems lie. I know that my interpretation of the Founders' vision for America is different from your, according to our exchanges in other threads, anyway, but I'd like to toss my two cents into the pile for whatever it's worth. My first problem is that I don't believe a foreign government should be taking it upon itself to dictate the lives of others. I mean, we as libertarians don't want the government forcibly moving us, temporary or permanently, so why be okay with them doing it to others? The United States shouldn't be sticking its nose into that mess at all, as far as I'm concerned, but relocating people to foreign lands (and why are we going to hoist this problem onto other people? We shouldn't be forcing other governments or their citizens to put up with this) isn't something we have the power to do. I know, I know, Trump makes his money in real estate and development, but this still isn't something he should have the power to do, and I say that as someone who voted for Trump and like a lot of what he's done since taking office. The second thing I have a problem with is that 'temporary' usually becomes 'permanent' when it comes to government things. Like all those bases that were just going to be temporary and all we've done since WWII is expand them. A lot of temporary policies, structures, or other decisions quickly fall into the quagmire of permanency, often with the citizens of other countries being left to deal with what we've dropped into their laps. I think this is the reason Trump doesn't suggest they temporarily relocate to America: they very quickly could become a longterm problem of ours. That being said, I'm hopeful that this is just posturing on Trump's part, kind of like the tariffs seem to be. That's not to say he doesn't have any teeth behind what he says, but I think Trump is good at making big plans just to bring people to the negotiating table. If that's all this is, I'm a little more optimistic. If not, I think we could have a major problem.
    78 replies | 851 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:36 AM
    89 replies | 1719 view(s)
More Activity

105 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    dupe
  2. View Conversation
    Theo!!!!! hugs!!!
  3. View Conversation
    I just started looking at the Constitution Party platform since you recommended it awhile back. There are some good things in it, but there are also some concessions to statism that I think are dangerous despite the fact that I'm moving away from strict anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. They support regulation of "obscenity", which isn't really defined, they support some drug restrictions, and they are careful to show their respect for agents of our currently illegitimate state (veterans), as well as condemning attempts to cut their benefits despite the fact that they are paid out of our pockets and for participating in unjust wars for an unjust system.

    The Constitution Party isn't all bad, and I might support some of their candidates, but I don't think there is any party I can support on principle (LP is pro-choice so not an option) I respect strict theonomy even though I'm not sure I agree with it yet. I don't think anybody believes what I'm starting to believe these days.
  4. View Conversation
    My vm from June 15
  5. View Conversation
    Are you purposely dodging that last one?
  6. View Conversation
    Do you believe that it is possible to ethically justify joining the military or the police in modern day America? Or would you agree with me that it cannot be justified with our country in the state that its currently in? What would be your reasoning for your answer, one way or another?
  7. View Conversation
    We don't have to agree on everything to feel affection for each other and treat each other with dignity and respect!
  8. View Conversation
    Thank you Sir!
  9. View Conversation
    OK, so my question is, with relations to Galatians, how is it that you can call Roman Catholics on this board "brothers" even though they add works to the gospel just like the Judaizers did? How is adding baptism as a requirement in order to be saved any different than adding circumcision as a requirement?
  10. View Conversation
    Out of curiosity, how do you interpret Galatians 1:8-9 and 2 John 9-11?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 105
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
About Theocrat

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)

Signature


"Then David said to the Philistine, 'You come to me with a sword, a spear, and a javelin, but I come to you in the name of Yahweh of hosts, the God of the battle lines of Israel, Whom you have reproached.'" - 1 Samuel 17:45

"May future generations look back on our work and say that these were men and women who, in moment of great crisis, stood up to their politicians, the opinion-makers, and the Establishment, and saved their country." - Dr. Ron Paul

Contact


This Page
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?4634-Theocrat&s=0df37fedfa7c3e2e3bf08c1d05ae3dde
Instant Messaging

Send an Instant Message to Theocrat Using...

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
9,539
Posts Per Day
1.51
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
105
Most Recent Message
01-31-2016 11:07 AM
General Information
Last Activity
02-04-2025 11:13 PM
Join Date
10-04-2007
Referrals
4

243 Friends

  1. A. Havnes A. Havnes is offline

    Member

    A. Havnes
  2. acptulsa acptulsa is online now

    Member

    acptulsa
  3. AFPVet AFPVet is offline

    Member

    AFPVet
  4. allyinoh allyinoh is offline

    Member

    allyinoh
  5. Alternative 336 Alternative 336 is offline

    Member

    Alternative 336
  6. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  7. ammorris ammorris is offline

    Member

    ammorris
  8. amonasro amonasro is offline

    Member

    amonasro
  9. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  10. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Member

    angelatc
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 243
Page 1 of 25 12311 ... LastLast

08-26-2024


09-19-2023


01-06-2022


02-04-2021


03-18-2020


03-08-2020

  • 04:08 PM - Hidden

03-04-2020


02-27-2020


02-19-2020


11-07-2016

  • 08:25 AM - Hidden

06-18-2016


Page 1 of 21 12311 ... LastLast

11-16-2024


11-06-2024


09-14-2024


09-13-2024


09-12-2024


07-30-2024


07-24-2024


07-05-2024


01-24-2024



Page 1 of 21 12311 ... LastLast