Tab Content
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 08:59 PM
    That's pretty much where I am at. The situation has changed and requires new direction and priorities.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 08:58 PM
    Don’t threaten me with a good time. The proudest moments of my life involve 119-1 votes where I am the 1, so... :tears:
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 08:47 PM
    Bernie is on record saying: 1 - People like me need to be stamped out and eradicated. 2 - That the people who run the business I am in, which means me, by extension, need to be prosecuted and thrown in jail. 3 - That the energy grid must be nationalized, owned and run and doled out by the central government. That's a communist in my book.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 08:37 PM
    Well, that’s what happens when you murder someone.
    11 replies | 158 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 08:25 PM
    LOL, if there were no cops, the crime rate would go down.
    7 replies | 83 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    4 replies | 43 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:07 PM
    And black birth rates are even lower than white birth rates. If the "plan" was to replace whites with minorities that wouldn't be the case. There are two simple reasons why birth rates of newly arrived immigrants are higher and neither have anything to do with socialism. 1) Newly arrived immigrants often come from countries where they don't have access to birth control or information about birth control and 2) Birthright citizenship. Newly arrived immigrants want at least one kid with that's a citizen. Those kids, though, aren't having 5 kids. Your theory that this is based on socialism somehow causing whites not to have babies and minorities to have more babies just isn't supported by evidence.
    126 replies | 1753 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:00 PM
    *Hugs* Hope you get to feeling better!
    18 replies | 264 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 07:40 PM
    On the other hand, if we controlled those industries we could install a secret kill switch. Satan rises up out of the pit and FLICK all that tech totally bricks. That would be funny. And probably where the guillotines come from. :tears:
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 07:34 PM
    Well, you know what they say, money talks and bullshit walks. Massie starts handing out $5k door prizes he’s gonna have a boatload of people on his front porch.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 07:03 PM
    Who sets policy in Congress is all about who has the cash. We can talk about deep states and dark oligarchs and embedded bureaucracy for three forevers, but none of that matters. If our faction had a consistent cash advantage over decades we would ultimately claim a majority of Congress even if that was 40 years down the road.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 06:58 PM
    Constitutional Liberty Lobbying Group 2 Registered Lobbyists $180k 1 Executive Coordinator $75k 1 Legislative Analyst $75k 1 Fundraiser %, ~$90k 1 Chair $50k
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 06:47 PM
    That's why we need a wall. :p
    5 replies | 82 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 06:44 PM
    So does the green pipe.
    449 replies | 9676 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 06:28 PM
    One of the most powerful spends a Legislator has, is donating money to other legislators. If, after every dollar is spent, Massie had $50k just hanging out he could give $5k apiece to 10 allied Congressmen. You can bet those ten will now be more loyal and helpful. Even if they are already great people you can’t help it it’s human nature. So I am a lobbying org and I want to elevate Massie. I basically want to arrange $750k into his campaign accounts, and the I have to trust in him (because coordination is illegal) to spend like $500k on the election and $250k on dues and leadership and donations to other Members and all those other things that establishment candidates can afford to do that we can’t. Now here is the thing. Just throwing that much cash at the problem ALONE will reshape it in our direction some. People chase cash. It’s the natural process. If Massie has enough money to burn that he can make all these massive donations, then more Members will become Massie-like. As Massie-likeness becomes a positive thing, more Massie-like candidates will run and win. It sounds disgusting, and it is. But I tell you, the seeds are in Congress already. If we had access to dump millions and millions on Rand Paul and Thomas Massie every single cycle, in eight years we’ll have twelve “Massies” and near 80 Members friendly to his agenda, with Massie himself in a high enough position of leadership that his bills can no longer be ignored.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 06:27 PM
    Martha’s Vineyard Home Proves Obama Knows Global Warming’s a Hoax JOHN NOLTE 24 Aug 2019 Barack and Michelle Obama are proving with the purchase of a $15 million home on Martha’s Vineyard that they know Global Warming is a hoax. Do you want to know the very last thing a true believer in Global Warming would ever do…? Move to an island and invest $15 million in a home with a — no joke — ocean view. But…
    19 replies | 219 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Today, 06:13 PM
    The only two things Rep. Gabbard has in common with Dr. Ron Paul are: She boldly calls out her own political party for its corruption and failure to uphold its principles, and She is against interventionist foreign policies. Other than those things, she is a Progressive, through and through, which means she is an enemy of a true, Constitutional republic and has no respect for the rule of law, private property, the life of the defenseless unborn, and pretty much every other individual right given to us from God, not the State.
    29 replies | 862 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 06:11 PM
    Bernie Sanders is my ally on a number of issues. That doesn't change the fact that he is, in fact, a communist.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 06:07 PM
    I am extremely familiar with this problem. I, too was gagged by Thom Tillis when I was in the NC House. Nevertheless, get me enough money and bundles and I can get whatever passed into law. Massie can’t afford to buy a leadership position right? What if the lobbying group trying to pass these 5 laws had a clean bundled $25k to hand him and stakehorse his leadership position? As just one example. You give me enough hard cold cash and I’ll maneuver our caucus into the real kingmakers. It’s not that hard to do, at that level it’s just math, really.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 06:04 PM
    Which is basically Ron Paul's position from 2008, with which I fully agree.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 05:46 PM
    Even separated by outer space, woemen can't stand each other.
    5 replies | 82 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 05:35 PM
    If I were in charge of an org trying to make this happen, I would split all this out into like four or five single topic bills, write them out as ‘model legislation,’ shop them around to Congress and the Senate, and promote them to Congress and to the public. Do a good job and all five measures get enacted in 6 to 12 years. Spend another 8 years cleaning up the messes they made when passing the laws, and refining the code to make it better and frankly fairer, and once happy disband the org and go do something else.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 05:08 PM
    Immigration is a divisive issue because it is an extremely complex multi-dimensional thing, but tribalism requires facile and superficial slogans. So tribes form around pithy but almost meaningless jargon meanwhile anyone who doesn’t adopt the jargon becomes “out-group.” The system perpetuates itself by both “sides” ostracizing anyone actually attempting to produce real solutions. Anyone not in lockstep with the secure borders tribe is an open border lunatic. Anyone not in lockstep with the free travel tribe is an East German Stasi. There will never be an actual conversation anywhere until we stop doing that stupidness. To the actual policy of immigration. I do believe the Constitution authorizes Congress to regulate immigration and by extension the borders. Legal immigration needs to be completely reformed from the ground up. There is no reason for the process to be as arcane and lengthy and pointlessly difficult as it is today. You have to fix legal immigration first before the fixes for illegal immigration make sense to the wider electorate.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:18 PM
    That’s true. In my experience in and out of public and party office the most passionate and tireless opponents of illegal immigration are legal immigrants.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:15 PM
    In a way. I guess all bottom up stuff looks similar from many perspectives. I think this will heavily divide red states and blue states. I think red states will continue to expand RKBA and blue states will continue to restrict it. After that, the vast majority of mass shootings will be in blue states, and the ones that do happen in red states much more limited in casualties. I suspect that we will sit like that for maybe a decade, with all this violence in the blue states and way less violence in the red states, before blue states start experimenting with expanding RKBA.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:05 PM
    Again, I don’t believe you. If you gave handguns to every soul in Chicago, a crap ton of criminals would die in the first month, and then homicide would drop 40% by year end. The actual quantity of mass shooters is only a drop in the bucket compared to total homicides. If 25% of everyone is armed, even when a mass shooter pops off he only kills one or two instead of ten or twenty. Your premise presumes that nothing can be done to effect mass shootings without supporting your premise. I have repeatedly disagreed with the premise, and all you are doing is restating it. Mass shootings probably will increase, because we as a nation are unwilling to do what is necessary to stop them. They will increase until we are finally willing to do what needs done. The more gun control they enact, the worse the shootings will get. You’ll almost be able to set your watch by it.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 03:56 PM
    It’s already happening. The correct way. Municipalities, Counties, and States are already arming teachers, modifying or eliminating “gun free zones” expanding into Constitutional Carry. It’s coming from the bottom up so maybe it’s harder to see. But bottom up is how real change happens. Over time it will become clearer and clearer that these mass shooting events happen less and less against hardened targets, which will influence policy makers to emulate success, adding more data and inspiring more change. Yes we have a three steps forward two steps back thing going on with red flags, but the RKBA expansionist faction will ultimately prevail because it’s bottom up. So to your question how do we eliminate gun control in reality. That soup is already cooking and mostly only needs time and our continued RKBA guidance.
    400 replies | 2648 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 03:49 PM
    Had he not shot the attacker, he would have been charged with brandishing a firearm. Of course that would have been a lesser charge with less prison time.
    11 replies | 158 view(s)
More Activity

105 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
  2. View Conversation
    Theo!!!!! hugs!!!
  3. View Conversation
    I just started looking at the Constitution Party platform since you recommended it awhile back. There are some good things in it, but there are also some concessions to statism that I think are dangerous despite the fact that I'm moving away from strict anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. They support regulation of "obscenity", which isn't really defined, they support some drug restrictions, and they are careful to show their respect for agents of our currently illegitimate state (veterans), as well as condemning attempts to cut their benefits despite the fact that they are paid out of our pockets and for participating in unjust wars for an unjust system.

    The Constitution Party isn't all bad, and I might support some of their candidates, but I don't think there is any party I can support on principle (LP is pro-choice so not an option) I respect strict theonomy even though I'm not sure I agree with it yet. I don't think anybody believes what I'm starting to believe these days.
  4. View Conversation
    My vm from June 15
  5. View Conversation
    Are you purposely dodging that last one?
  6. View Conversation
    Do you believe that it is possible to ethically justify joining the military or the police in modern day America? Or would you agree with me that it cannot be justified with our country in the state that its currently in? What would be your reasoning for your answer, one way or another?
  7. View Conversation
    We don't have to agree on everything to feel affection for each other and treat each other with dignity and respect!
  8. View Conversation
    Thank you Sir!
  9. View Conversation
    OK, so my question is, with relations to Galatians, how is it that you can call Roman Catholics on this board "brothers" even though they add works to the gospel just like the Judaizers did? How is adding baptism as a requirement in order to be saved any different than adding circumcision as a requirement?
  10. View Conversation
    Out of curiosity, how do you interpret Galatians 1:8-9 and 2 John 9-11?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 105
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
About Theocrat

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)


"Diverse weights are an abomination unto the LORD, and a false balance is not good." - Proverbs 20:23

"Federal Reserve-generated increases in money supply cause economic inequality... By the time the increased money supply trickles down to middle- and working-class Americans, the economy is already beset by inflation. So most average Americans see their standard of living decline as a result of Fed-engendered money supply increases." - Dr. Ron Paul


This Page
Instant Messaging

Send an Instant Message to Theocrat Using...


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
01-31-2016 11:07 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 06:22 PM
Join Date

245 Friends

  1. A. Havnes A. Havnes is offline


    A. Havnes
  2. acptulsa acptulsa is offline


  3. AFPVet AFPVet is offline


  4. allyinoh allyinoh is offline


  5. Alternative 336 Alternative 336 is offline


    Alternative 336
  6. american.swan american.swan is offline


  7. ammorris ammorris is offline


  8. amonasro amonasro is offline


  9. amy31416 amy31416 is offline


  10. angelatc angelatc is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 245
Page 1 of 25 12311 ... LastLast


  • 08:25 AM - Hidden


No results to display...
Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast















Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast