Tab Content
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 04:17 PM
    Libertarian VP Candidate William F. Weld Continues to be Anti-Gun https://www.nraila.org/articles/20160826/libertarian-vp-candidate-william-f-weld-continues-to-be-anti-gun
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 04:11 PM
    I did not say Trump was articulate in his delivery. If you had a choice between Pence and a gun grabbing Socialist like Weld, you would pick Weld?
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 03:06 PM
    No comparison, not even close. Pence over a hard core gun grabbing Socialist like Weld. It says allot about who Johnson really is by him having Weld on his ticket. Say what you want about Trump's positions and the simplicity that he delivers them but it is pretty clear when questioned that Trump is knowledge on topics unlike Johnson. I am not just speaking of Johnson not knowing what or where Allepo is.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:23 AM
    You mean later in the thread back in 2015 discussing the radical demographic shift in this country was not what the founders intended when they use the word "posterity"? Which means all future generations of people - the descendants of a person. Obviously majority European white. If you want to be all SJW outraged about history I have no control over, scream racist and hate the founders for these words then that is your business. It makes no difference who echo'd the words. Having a problem with that is like complaining water is wet and because Hitler maybe at one time said water is wet.
    21 replies | 246 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:14 AM
    So now you are throwing your dear leader Glenn Beck under the bus. Weren't you just praising Beck taking over the LP recently?
    21 replies | 246 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:13 AM
    Users guide to reading acptulsa's posts: Excerpts from the Constitution are now hate speech and stormfront propaganda. I do not endorse that site.
    21 replies | 246 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:09 AM
    Wow, acptulsa is finally coming around. LP != libertarian. Well, that did not last long. Praising Glenn Beck coming in 3, 2, 1.
    21 replies | 246 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:38 PM
    Where did you get the idea I am not a supporter? Never mind, getting your news about a member from some people here is about as accurate as your news about Ron Paul from the MSM.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:48 PM
    I do not disagree with you on some of this but the concern is where does it go from there. 1. At what point is this not age discrimination. After it is 21 some states will raise it to 23, after it is 23, then 25, you can see where it is going. You mention car-rental companies and I could provide a good example of age creep and age discrimination of responsible adults at that age. Many years ago I flew to a rural airport for work in the middle of no where and was denied a pre-booked rental because they said 24 was too young and they had too many partiers renting cars. Did not matter I was on business dressed in a suit and tie, had business cards, it was the last flight for a few days, there were no services, no taxis at the airport and the nearest town was 10 miles out in 95 degree heat. They were closing up and they were like too bad. Of course the employees did not give a shit it would not give me a lift. I was just a peon at the time in a company with several thousand people and it took the CEO calling their big shots so I would not be stranded for a few days. 2. Further regulation and fines creep.
    51 replies | 679 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:44 PM
    STFU about me and stop replying to my posts then. If I did not know how this started and there was not this three year flame war I would think you simply got me mixed up with someone else. I never denied that and you are simply making shit up to fit your narrative of me being some big Trump supporter here. When all it was is evaluating policy both good and bad related to Trump in the 2016 Campaign Forum and that he would be my second choice.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    51 replies | 679 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:15 PM
    Still a chance nothing comes from it just allot of talk. With Ivanka in his ear and his statements on guns going back to the 90s it is a cause of concern. If something else dominates the news cycle all this will be forgotten in a few months.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:07 PM
    Maybe you should STFU about me and stop replying to all my posts so the thread can stay on topic.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:59 PM
    More like below.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:11 PM
    What do you think happens at meet-ups and canvassing. At least it stops you since you would have to cross the border and worry about ICE. Ultimately your trolling would be limited to the non-supporter forum.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:51 PM
    Like I said they could leave one forum open for non-supporters. If you met Ron at some event obviously there would be someone there to give you a pin to unlock the rest of the forums. The point being the suggestion to do so is to reduce trolls, reduce opposing campaigns and think tanks like Share Blue accounts and shut-down all foreign influence in the forum. Someone like acptulsa may not make the effort to go to a meetup to come back here to undermine the forum. It is the behavior of some very nasty people here that work as anti-grassroots preventing sign-ups and driving real supporters away from participating not only here but for the campaigns. Which is probably the entire point of why they do it. His reaction was what I predicted since that is the last thing him and others would want to happen since it would reduce their influence here.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:38 PM
    They can do that now and they can do that at Rand Paul meet-ups already. The pin would just unlock the rest of the forum that people like you would not have access to so we can get work done promoting liberty candidates without your flame wars. But the only way you can pick-up a pin is if you are willing to canvass for Rand or said liberty candidate. The fact that you oppose such a thing proves you are afraid you will no longer be able to undermine these forums. They avoid these forums because of all the riff raff here. It has been a problem for the campaigns because of people like you.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:22 PM
    If you are out canvassing for Rand Paul then you are not secret are you. Every time you post you keep proving you are not the supporter you say you are. You are running a sham here to drive real supporters from the forum. The fact that you are so afraid to go to a Rand Paul meet-up and simply get a pin so you can sign-up here shows you are a fraud. btw - for anyone else reading this, like I said above that is not the say the owner could not leave one forum open for everyone. Just the rest of it walled off with the account upgraded through use of a pin acquired at a Rand Paul meet up.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:19 PM
    Rand Paul is a public figure and political campaigns are VERY public. Rand and Ron Paul meet-ups were very public. Simply showing up at a meet-up and getting a pin so you can sign-up an account on this site is Orwellian? Why is it so important to you to protect people in this forum that want to destroy it and undermine the liberty movement, rather than the meet-up option to stop it?
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:14 PM
    Confirmed troll and not a grass roots Paul supporter. Since, why are you so afraid of the designated Rand Paul organizer-forum member for your state approving your RPF account after simply meeting you at a Rand Paul meet up? It would ensure the forum is used for the mission and not troublemaking/ This helps with credibility that you are a real supporter, not sitting in some warehouse for Share Blue or an overseas foreign government account. Instead of ringing your hands, why not explain why that is wrong?
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:11 PM
    Why are you so afraid of the designated Rand Paul organizer for your state approving your RPF account after meeting you at a Paul meet up? This helps with credibility that you are a real supporter, not sitting in some warehouse for Share Blue or an overseas foreign government account. Your opposition to this tells me again you are not who you say you are.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:01 PM
    Yes, your are right I am speaking as it relates to what I propose considering it is a grass roots forum to promote public political candidates. I should have made that more clear and typed that out too fast. Sorry about that. Will edit. Fixed as: "If you want to be involved in politics and promote political candidates publicly in a grass roots forum you should not be anonymous to the forum owner".
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:56 AM
    The media in the next cycle will say RPF is dominated by Russian bots. They would be wrong but no doubt many here are not here for the intended purpose. Local activist verification will shut that right down as well as purge people like acptulsa that cause all the problems in these forums pretending to be a supporter.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:53 AM
    Did you read the forum mission? Do you even know what this forum is for? How is it authoritarian in a grass roots organizing forum for political candidates that designated organizers approve accounts to confirm they are real activists rather someone sitting in a think tank somewhere or overseas. This much is obvious and your opposition to it for a very public political candidates shows you are not who you say you are here.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:47 AM
    Never said how it would be verified and you leaped to saying the owner of this forum would steal your identity. You are proving more and more with each post you are not a US citizen and are here to undermine the forums. If you really support Ron/Rand's campaigns you would have no issue not being anonymous here. Your opposition and your posting history clearly shows you are not who you say you are. If Rand runs for 2020 he will have designated people in each state. Each of those people could be designated to approve RPF accounts. Everyone else would have to get approval from the designated state RPF person. This would prevent foreign influence, opposing campaign influence and other opposition think tanks, like Share blue. Maybe leave one forum open for anyone to post it in heavily moderated to keep people like you from pulling this crap.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:35 AM
    Again, proving you do not support Rand Paul's platform and you are calling me out because I do.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:33 AM
    This is a grass roots forum to promote political candidates. If you want to be involved in politics and promote political candidates publicly in a grass roots forum you should not be anonymous to the forum owner. To fulfil the intended mission of this forum I believe the owner should require verification. It would keep riff raff like you and others from destroying the efforts of the work we do here with your campaign of hate against various forum members.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:28 AM
    There is nothing like that anywhere in the thread about being vocal against Trump makes on a leftist. No one has a problem with that.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:27 AM
    Rand is not for open borders and did propose policy to secure the border. If you do not support him and think he is a ___ then why are you here?
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:05 AM
    Sorry you have to go back. You can attack me all you like but those 43k posts and attacks will not make a difference with Trump's immigration crackdown or help you gain legal status or pathway to citizenship.
    467 replies | 5625 view(s)
More Activity
About adissa

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
487
Posts Per Day
0.25
General Information
Last Activity
09-20-2016 12:27 PM
Join Date
11-12-2012
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. kahless kahless is offline

    Member

    kahless
  2. Ron Paul in 2008 Ron Paul in 2008 is offline

    Member

    Ron Paul in 2008
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2

09-16-2016


No results to display...
Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314

07-19-2016



Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314