Tab Content
  • LibertyEagle's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:59 AM
    Yes, I agree. It was stupid to impeach Clinton for getting a blowjob in the white house. What he should have been impeached for and then hung for was for selling military technical secrets to the Chinese government.
    747 replies | 15130 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-14-2017, 01:39 PM
    No doubt there is push back but as usual for this particular article CNN and WAPO had to use lies again to push their agenda.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-11-2017, 03:21 PM
    ---
    47 replies | 1143 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-09-2017, 11:05 PM
    I wonder how many participated that have an RPF account. Likely more on the libertarian far left rather than the libertarian moderates, right and paleos.
    6 replies | 279 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 11:15 PM
    It was just one of the points I listed, what about the others I listed and your belief on this topic?
    625 replies | 17981 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 10:40 PM
    If you are against a ban I guess you can say you stayed true to some textbook definition of left libertarianism. All the while by doing so moving further away from the ability to experience it in real life. If you support the ban a great many people move closer to experiencing liberty, Paleolibertarianism. I take the later.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 04:02 PM
    Ron appeared stronger on immigration back then but after 2012 both started to significantly back off their earlier immigration positions and people took notice. I think it was strategic since that is the way they thought the wind was blowing, but they were wrong. So you have: - Appearing wishy washy and using wishy washy language on immigration early on was not going to fly this cycle. By the time Rand did get tough on immigration his campaign was effectively already over with little to no support. - The strategic decision to work with GOP-E and release his Heritage think tank tax plan with the hidden business VAT fell on deaf ears. This kind of VAT was something Ron always spoke out against since Congress could keep increasing it and people would not understand why the price of goods were increasing due to the VAT was hidden in means of production. His support had already been at the tipping point by then but I believe this effectively sealed his fate exactly at a time he needed the momentum. This was not the cycle to try and curry favor with the establishment on either the left or right.
    625 replies | 17981 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 03:40 PM
    When I said it keeps getting worse I had not even seen "knocking out 3 teeth, and possibly breaking his jaw", before I posted that. I wonder how long it will be before we see the pictures.
    625 replies | 17981 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 02:55 PM
    Wow, not good. With each passing day it keeps getting worse. Whats next, two days from now we will find he is blind in one eye or missing finders or something.
    625 replies | 17981 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 02:52 PM
    I would think maybe rural and more liberty minded states might get a reprieve but not on the federal highways and no doubt states would be bribed with federal funding or construction contracts or faced being denied of it. One can only hope for more separation of state from federal powers in regions before then.
    6 replies | 127 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 01:47 PM
    Property taxes should not exist in a free society. Not a fan of HOA's but if people willingly enter into contracts with one another, such as HOA's, I do not see how that is unconstitutional. They sign knowing that they do not really own the property.
    114 replies | 739 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 01:27 PM
    I agree but then I would not buy property tied to an HOA and sign the restricted use contract. If I did I would expect to honor the contract I signed.
    114 replies | 739 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 01:24 PM
    Everyone will have 5 years to get their car off the road or sell it for scrap http://www.autonews.com/article/20171105/INDUSTRY_REDESIGNED/171109944/bob-lutz:-kiss-the-good-times-goodbye I suspect some cities and major highways will try to mandate it, maybe 10-15. NYC no doubt.
    6 replies | 127 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 01:06 PM
    You are saying you have no issue with the truck driver coming here on a diversity visa and that anyone that does is an FDR supporting Communist. :rolleyes:
    272 replies | 5726 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 12:52 PM
    Are you saying you have no issue with the truck driver coming here on a diversity Visa?
    272 replies | 5726 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 11:51 AM
    What are you talking about, I responded point by point a few posts above yours, no three dots in any post. 6549816 Ultimately I see your position as a direct assault on individual liberty in the US since you have no recognition that mass immigration of peoples with opposing ideology will make individual liberty or any form of living in a libertarian like society impossible in our life time.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 11:39 AM
    Granted, I missed some pages of this thread but sad we are getting to the point in this forum where someone has to say what should be obvious.
    272 replies | 5726 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 11:26 AM
    You are against minimizing the risk by having some form of immigration controls such as a ban on Muslims from regions with activist terror cells. So again you have no issue with immigration of peoples that support and will implement an authoritarian belief system that we will be subject to. By importing people that use and believe in the welfare state they will eventually vote for MOAR government. Not only have you surrendered your beliefs to statism you are now advocating for statism using immigration as a tool to achieve the means.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 10:54 AM
    I cleaned it up specifically for you after your complaint that it was garbled. Which ones do not reflect your viewpoint? 1. You believe US intervention 100% is responsible for Islamic terrorism without any recognition of the inherent problems with Islam or the following issues: 2. No risk management on what you believe are past wrongs the US has committed. 3. Have no concern of radical Islam and jihadist immigration or retribution. 4. Have no concern for US victims or potential US victims.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 10:47 AM
    So what you and otherone are saying is: 1. You believe US intervention 100% is responsible for Islamic terrorism without any recognition of the inherent problems with Islam or the following issues: 2. No risk management based recognition what you believe are past wrongs the US has committed. 3. Have no concern of radical Islam and jihadist immigration or retribution. 4. Have no concern for US victims or potential US victims.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 10:22 AM
    Care to address #2 - #7?
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 10:21 AM
    Really, nonsense? Like the US is made up solely of wealthy people that can simply pickup and move when the culture or language changes in their community to some rural homestead to live among their own? How many times do you expect people to have the ability to keep doing this in their lifetime? Just stick your head in the sand and completely deny the millions of middle class and poor people in cities and suburbia that are being outnumbered by immigration and wake up one day to culture and language shock. The community which I was raised went from 90% European English speaking white to 20%. It is not easy especially for senior citizens to adapt to the culture shock, discrimination and languages issues in their community. This is taking place all over the US in cities and surburbia. People that promote open borders are effectively promoting abuse of the native population.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 09:49 AM
    I honestly did not mean that as an attack but rather an observation from your posting history. It is not about what you describe but rather I cannot get my head around why you ignore #2 - #7, and respond only with #1 and #8, below. Well, if you take such offense to it I suppose you are not? You see I want to live consistently in a region that "promotes peace and prosperity, individualism, individual rights, anti-tax, anti-statist, pro-liberty, pro-free market, freedom of choice, freedom of association, self-ownership, property rights, individual self defense and non-aggression principal". Your support of policies make this impossible in my lifetime short and long term is why I came to the conclusion that I did. Not once did I attack anyone here but I cannot say the same for you and Ender for my disagreeing with your love for bringing people here that want to deny me life and liberty. Thinking about this list more I could probably add more like, "being made a foreigner in my own land with a language and culture I do not understand is unfair to do to people living here". But we have not gotten that far in the thread yet for you and Ender to deny it is a problem for people living here?
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-08-2017, 01:38 AM
    I have repeatedly and it always goes as I describe below. No reasonable individual would discuss this issue in this manner unless they are a Muslim political activist. Therefore I asked if you are Muslim and since you never denied the claim or this list it became a belief. So referring to you and AZJoe as Muslims is not an attack but rather a belief. You are on #8 and #9 right now. btw - thx for the name calling update, I added "hypocrite" to #8.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-07-2017, 11:11 PM
    Their demands in order. 1. "Trump/Pence must go". 2. Illegal immigrants. Demands for the federal government to stop enforcing any immigration laws. 3. Complaint of Muslim immigrants being banned. 4. Something about "Millions—children, the elderly, disabled, the sick, the poor—denied healthcare, food assistance, the very right to live." Wtf is this, I have no idea, are we North Korea now.
    11 replies | 327 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    11-07-2017, 08:26 PM
    Like Ender maybe AZjoe is another Muslim. See posting pattern. You quoted this part a few posts back: "Little to no concern of growing the welfare state due to immigration", notice I called out "immigration", in other words immigrants coming here and receiving welfare, not American single moms.
    300 replies | 5237 view(s)
More Activity
About adissa

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
487
Posts Per Day
0.27
General Information
Last Activity
09-20-2016 12:27 PM
Join Date
11-12-2012
Referrals
0

3 Friends

  1. kahless kahless is offline

    Member

    kahless
  2. LibertyEagle LibertyEagle is offline

    Paleoconservative

    LibertyEagle
  3. Ron Paul in 2008 Ron Paul in 2008 is offline

    Member

    Ron Paul in 2008
Showing Friends 1 to 3 of 3

09-16-2016


No results to display...
Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

08-04-2016


08-03-2016


08-02-2016



Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast