Tab Content
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 07:28 PM
    Good point, almost forgot about her. I am not sure about AR confiscation but I think they are stupid enough to push mental health laws regardless of the fine details. We would end up with something like if you were ever prescribed an SSRI or some other mind altering medication in your lifetime you would lose your gun rights.
    299 replies | 4950 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 06:55 PM
    Democrats' Confidence in Mass Media Rises Sharply From 2016 http://news.gallup.com/poll/219824/democrats-confidence-mass-media-rises-sharply-2016.aspx It has always worked for them so far why stop now. Just look at the term white nationalism, which is essentially the immigration policy that existed for the majority of US history to maintain an white majority that nobody every batted an eye about. They have fear mongered the term so much people are learning to equate the term with racism, discrimination and Nazis. The media is ensuring people cannot determine the difference between White Nationalism and White Supremacy.
    299 replies | 4950 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 05:03 PM
    964230000957259776 964231208795164672
    299 replies | 4950 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 04:53 PM
    So you have the law enforcement saying no connection but this Jereb guy telling the media something different. Local law enforcement: No ties between militia and Florida high school shooter http://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/02/15/florida-school-shooting-suspect-nikolas-cruz-member-white-nationalist-militia-tallahassee-leader-say/341751002/
    299 replies | 4950 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 04:25 PM
    Perhaps, but not all alt-right are Nazi's. Probably quite a few Paul supporters over there.
    299 replies | 4950 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 04:02 PM
    Was reading there yesterday, saw quite a few posts about talking crap to a reporter. The Gateway Pundit also got played by the fake Buzzfeed article, that got me to until I found it did not exist since it sounds like something they would say after a tragedy. Imposter tweets made it even harder for a reporter to cover Florida school shooting https://www.poynter.org/news/imposter-tweets-made-it-even-harder-reporter-cover-florida-school-shooting
    299 replies | 4950 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-15-2018, 03:25 PM
    All over the media now that he was a White Nationalist. It sounds fake and I bet the media knows it is fake but I believe they just don't care since it helps their narrative. Between the media's activism, outright lying or exaggerating on just about everything and the usual complete incompetence in vetting sources this sounds like bs. Did the media just get played again by 4chan?
    299 replies | 4950 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 11:34 PM
    You again avoided the question whether you are a Muslim for about the 6th time now, I think that confirms it. I am not using that as an insult or as an insult to your religion. I was just pointing out that you seem overly biased in this discussion and understandable considering you are a Muslim. You oppose Rand's immigration plan to restrict immigration from terrorist regions which happen to be Muslim. I am going to take a guess that perhaps you have relatives in these regions?
    53 replies | 773 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 11:10 PM
    This is like the 5th time this has come up and again I did not call you a Muslim. I asked and you still refuse to answer the question. The discussion had nothing to do with the 1st Amendment. We were discussing blocking Muslim immigration which you opposed. Do you oppose blocking immigration from regions with active terrorist cells that are Muslim?
    53 replies | 773 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 05:54 PM
    Yet Ender wonders why I simply asked if he is a Muslim. Post after post defending all sorts of Muslim immigration and moral equivalence despite the facts to a point of twisting the facts.
    53 replies | 773 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 05:49 PM
    Wow, that is such a blatant lie. Not even close. I believed he should focus on winning the Republican primary and NOT change his platform to appeal to a far left minority that will never vote for him in the first place. I thought he should stick to his earlier winning platform rather than adjust to please the establishment in an anti-establishment cycle. The people do not give a damn about that. They wanted an anti-establishment candidate and the average folks outside of here obviously did not see that in Rand. Some of that Rand brought it on himself in adjusting to please the establishment in 2015.
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 04:22 PM
    History has since proven the many observations I made of what should and could have been done differently were correct. I cannot take all the credit since many others here have said the same things. More like you do not have the intellectual capacity to determine what is a nuanced discussion on policy and shitting on his platform.
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 04:15 PM
    Hogwash and anyone doing so would have gotten banned here pretty quickly. By the time August 2015 came around his campaign was no longer viable. One could say it really ended with the dropping his own tax plans for the chain saw moment in promotion of the Heritage Foundation tax plan. The VAT his father warned against in previous years. Avoiding all issues other than civil liberties at that point obviously appeared to the media and the people as an educational campaign and not a winning strategy to win the Republican primary. You want to call people liars while you live in ignorance then have at it.
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 04:02 PM
    Attacking the establishment works, who would have thought that. Oh yeah, Ron Paul did in 2008. But Ron Paul less so in 2012 and Rand Paul even less in 2016. Look at the rate of success for each of those campaigns.
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 03:59 PM
    Spot on. I believe most rational Paul supporters recognize this as well as people that do not support Rand or Trump. One thing you still hear allot is that attacking Trump head on was a disaster for any GOP candidate. None had the personality to pull it off. Rand as well as others should have just stuck to promoting themselves and attacking the Democrats. The perception was that by attacking Trump it made them guardians of the establishment in an anti-establishment cycle. But to the Rand is infallible crowd here, you are now officially a Trump shill for stating the obvious.
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 03:51 PM
    Which again makes my point on the immigration issue.
    38 replies | 715 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 03:49 PM
    Another valid discussion on the 2016 campaign, so?
    80 replies | 3517 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 03:47 PM
    Discussing the 2016 campaign and what is in the news cycle, so?
    645 replies | 21501 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    53 replies | 773 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 03:40 PM
    Moron, it was a guest that said that I was quoting a guest.
    15 replies | 532 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 03:12 PM
    Millions of people, who? I have not listened to Alex Jones in a long time and do not remember him talking about these things, him?
    21 replies | 271 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 03:09 PM
    I never posted a thread like that or shilled for Trump. I posted saying Trump would be my second choice due to aspects of the very real Trump-Sessions immigration document in 2015. Rand could have done the same with his immigration plan but instead he took a left turn at the worst possible time in an anti-establishment cycle where immigration was a hot issue. Maybe if there were more Rand supporters like me waving their arms telling Rand not to drive his campaign off a cliff by at the worst possible time ignoring immigration, economic issues and instead of focusing his time appealing to GOP-E and trying to curry favor from a small minority that will never vote for him he would have won the nomination. But of course people like to live in bubbles and worship their candidate as infallible. You would rather wave Rand's car right off the cliff instead.
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 01:50 PM
    True and those that oppose it will be called old white racists, followed by audience laughs, being ostracized and loss of career. As the left pushes harder on this I see the backbone of whites thickening. At least far stronger backbone than in 2015. Now at least there is some opposition but only so far some mentions on Fox News, something that would have been unheard of a couple years ago on that channel. This forum shows a bit a backbone to since threads and comments like yours would typically result in shouts of racism and bans only a couple years ago.
    21 replies | 271 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 01:31 PM
    More revisionist crap. I never hurled insults or called people stupid for their opposition. Again, I was not going to trash policy I support no matter who it comes from but you still can't handle that because anything Drumpf just like in 2015. There are also posts here where I called out Trump on being contradictory but again the tactics of the opposition to Trump was to ignore that in an effort to silence and herd people accordingly. Again a tactic you tried but failed. My join date is 2007 long before the Trump campaign. Agreeing with some aspects of Trump policy did not mean I was campaigning for Trump over Rand. Disagreeing with how Rand ran his campaign against Trump which I believe caused him to lose does not mean that either. Acptulsa
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 01:09 PM
    Revisionist history, all of it. How many times did I say that it is a possibility but there are no other options other than to take the risk or vote for someone where we know exactly where she stands. My posts on Trump were favorable or unfavorable on specific aspects of posted policy, such as the Trump-Sessions immigration plan. I am not going to oppose policy and hurl insults for policy I support simply because it is coming out of the Trump campaign, that was the #nevertrump tactic. A tactic you echoed in these forums as soon as it was released out of the Neocon think tanks. What does that say about you and your 43k posts? If I had to do it again based on what we know now compared to the only other option being Hillary I would still vote for Trump just to keep far worse out of office.
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 11:32 AM
    F*cking media, yeah they got me, the media lies, every damn article I read recently made it sound like they are hiring Blue Apron. I had to go to the White House website and get the transcript of Mulvaney's comments. Will have to wait and see what it is. The media may actually be right at some point but not just yet.
    117 replies | 1672 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 11:18 AM
    IDK. We do not know how far down the rabbit hole Trump will go and whether there will be viable 3rd party opposition. Trump certainly seems to be heading in the direction of full retard GOP-E. The same people that fought so hard to keep him out of office, the man now has his head right up their ass.
    60 replies | 979 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-14-2018, 11:11 AM
    The critics have good points on this one, a meal on food stamps costs $1.37, the average order from Blue Apron's meal-kit delivery service runs upwards of $10 per person. The kit cannot possibly address individual dietary restrictions - food allergies and the products no doubt will be loaded with preservatives. A government contract with NYSE/Blue Apron, sounds like more establishment Corporatism. Trump again filling the swamp he was supposed to drain.
    117 replies | 1672 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-13-2018, 06:57 PM
    It seems like Trump in his quest to be liked conceded his power to the military and GOP-E. He gets to feel like a great military leader getting his ego stroked as they give him an attaboy. It will sink in eventually that he has been relegated to a figurehead and unlike past Presidents I do not believe he can emotionally handle that. So I think the possibility exists yet that Trump may swing back the other way at some point. If it is not after it sinks in he is a figurehead, then rather after they turn on him and they will.
    44 replies | 924 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    02-12-2018, 08:03 PM
    I vote no on unlimited immigration. I believe there should be a complete moratorium on immigration, mass humane deportations of illegals, repatriation financial incentives and reparations offered as paid repatriation. This is unlikely to happen since those that wish to radically change the country politically, economically, demographically and culturally control the propaganda machine. A significant percentage of the population support their ideology but they are still a minority. However through rising immigrant birth rates, brainwashed youth growing older, maintaining current immigration levels and with little to no political opposition to it that in 5-10 years time this will change. If you think things are bad now in this future the US will be unrecognizable. We will all have the pay the price to our new masters and mourn the loss of what little liberty we have now. Brought to you by the Democratic party, the Republican establishment and the sham Libertarians. This is obvious, the polling data on immigrants and new citizens has confirmed it time and time again. It is so obvious that there is no doubt in my mind those supporting open borders in this forum could not possibly believe in limited government as they use political correctness and platitudes to promote the loss of our liberties.
    287 replies | 3607 view(s)
More Activity
About adissa

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
487
Posts Per Day
0.25
General Information
Last Activity
09-20-2016 12:27 PM
Join Date
11-12-2012
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. kahless kahless is offline

    Member

    kahless
  2. Ron Paul in 2008 Ron Paul in 2008 is offline

    Member

    Ron Paul in 2008
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2

09-16-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast

12-13-2016


10-23-2016

  • 08:25 PM - Hidden

09-21-2016


09-19-2016

  • 10:02 PM - Hidden
  • 03:18 PM - Hidden

09-17-2016


09-16-2016


09-15-2016



Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast