Tab Content
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 01:11 PM
    What do you think happens at meet-ups and canvassing. At least it stops you since you would have to cross the border and worry about ICE. Ultimately your trolling would be limited to the non-supporter forum.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:51 PM
    Like I said they could leave one forum open for non-supporters. If you met Ron at some event obviously there would be someone there to give you a pin to unlock the rest of the forums. The point being the suggestion to do so is to reduce trolls, reduce opposing campaigns and think tanks like Share Blue accounts and shut-down all foreign influence in the forum. Someone like acptulsa may not make the effort to go to a meetup to come back here to undermine the forum. It is the behavior of some very nasty people here that work as anti-grassroots preventing sign-ups and driving real supporters away from participating not only here but for the campaigns. Which is probably the entire point of why they do it. His reaction was what I predicted since that is the last thing him and others would want to happen since it would reduce their influence here.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:38 PM
    They can do that now and they can do that at Rand Paul meet-ups already. The pin would just unlock the rest of the forum that people like you would not have access to so we can get work done promoting liberty candidates without your flame wars. But the only way you can pick-up a pin is if you are willing to canvass for Rand or said liberty candidate. The fact that you oppose such a thing proves you are afraid you will no longer be able to undermine these forums. They avoid these forums because of all the riff raff here. It has been a problem for the campaigns because of people like you.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:22 PM
    If you are out canvassing for Rand Paul then you are not secret are you. Every time you post you keep proving you are not the supporter you say you are. You are running a sham here to drive real supporters from the forum. The fact that you are so afraid to go to a Rand Paul meet-up and simply get a pin so you can sign-up here shows you are a fraud. btw - for anyone else reading this, like I said above that is not the say the owner could not leave one forum open for everyone. Just the rest of it walled off with the account upgraded through use of a pin acquired at a Rand Paul meet up.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:19 PM
    Rand Paul is a public figure and political campaigns are VERY public. Rand and Ron Paul meet-ups were very public. Simply showing up at a meet-up and getting a pin so you can sign-up an account on this site is Orwellian? Why is it so important to you to protect people in this forum that want to destroy it and undermine the liberty movement, rather than the meet-up option to stop it?
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:14 PM
    Confirmed troll and not a grass roots Paul supporter. Since, why are you so afraid of the designated Rand Paul organizer-forum member for your state approving your RPF account after simply meeting you at a Rand Paul meet up? It would ensure the forum is used for the mission and not troublemaking/ This helps with credibility that you are a real supporter, not sitting in some warehouse for Share Blue or an overseas foreign government account. Instead of ringing your hands, why not explain why that is wrong?
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:11 PM
    Why are you so afraid of the designated Rand Paul organizer for your state approving your RPF account after meeting you at a Paul meet up? This helps with credibility that you are a real supporter, not sitting in some warehouse for Share Blue or an overseas foreign government account. Your opposition to this tells me again you are not who you say you are.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 12:01 PM
    Yes, your are right I am speaking as it relates to what I propose considering it is a grass roots forum to promote public political candidates. I should have made that more clear and typed that out too fast. Sorry about that. Will edit. Fixed as: "If you want to be involved in politics and promote political candidates publicly in a grass roots forum you should not be anonymous to the forum owner".
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:56 AM
    The media in the next cycle will say RPF is dominated by Russian bots. They would be wrong but no doubt many here are not here for the intended purpose. Local activist verification will shut that right down as well as purge people like acptulsa that cause all the problems in these forums pretending to be a supporter.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:53 AM
    Did you read the forum mission? Do you even know what this forum is for? How is it authoritarian in a grass roots organizing forum for political candidates that designated organizers approve accounts to confirm they are real activists rather someone sitting in a think tank somewhere or overseas. This much is obvious and your opposition to it for a very public political candidates shows you are not who you say you are here.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:47 AM
    Never said how it would be verified and you leaped to saying the owner of this forum would steal your identity. You are proving more and more with each post you are not a US citizen and are here to undermine the forums. If you really support Ron/Rand's campaigns you would have no issue not being anonymous here. Your opposition and your posting history clearly shows you are not who you say you are. If Rand runs for 2020 he will have designated people in each state. Each of those people could be designated to approve RPF accounts. Everyone else would have to get approval from the designated state RPF person. This would prevent foreign influence, opposing campaign influence and other opposition think tanks, like Share blue. Maybe leave one forum open for anyone to post it in heavily moderated to keep people like you from pulling this crap.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:35 AM
    Again, proving you do not support Rand Paul's platform and you are calling me out because I do.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:33 AM
    This is a grass roots forum to promote political candidates. If you want to be involved in politics and promote political candidates publicly in a grass roots forum you should not be anonymous to the forum owner. To fulfil the intended mission of this forum I believe the owner should require verification. It would keep riff raff like you and others from destroying the efforts of the work we do here with your campaign of hate against various forum members.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:28 AM
    That is nothing like that anywhere in the thread about being vocal against Trump. No one has a problem with that.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:27 AM
    Rand is not for open borders and did propose policy to secure the border. If you do not support him and think he is a ___ then why are you here?
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 11:05 AM
    Sorry you have to go back. You can attack me all you like but those 43k posts and attacks will not make a difference with Trump's immigration crackdown or help you gain legal status or pathway to citizenship.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:55 AM
    Got my answer for acptulsa . I. All of the above, which includes H. Mental illness. Are you banking on pathway to citizenship?
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:49 AM
    At least you are being honest and have just admitted you oppose Rand and Ron Paul campaign immigration platforms.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:42 AM
    Why not just admit the true reason for your 3 year campaign? One of these maybe? Devised some of this based on taking notice of who you attack. A. Anyone that opposes open borders in this forum. B. Anyone that opposes immigration from terrorist states. C. Opposition to Rand's immigration ban due to having family in restricted region.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:17 AM
    Obviously most of them are not posting and there are only a few people actually still posting. Have you not been paying attention to all the posts pushing open borders regardless of region in direct contradiction to Rand's immigration policies and ban? Curious, since you show up in my rep allot more than most, do you support immigration from terrorist states? It turns out most people here giving me neg rep on immigration threads have since admitted they are Muslims including in this thread.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 10:07 AM
    I do not think you realize that when this witch hunt started in 2015 the majority were not Trump supporters. After it started some here were still not Trump supporters but had enough, they left or played into it since the unwarranted hate was so ridiculous and extreme.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Today, 09:57 AM
    While they campaign against Rand's policies and attack those that defend it driving many away from this forum in a site that bears his name. The volume of acptulsa' orchestrated attacks however made it impossible to ignore and I figured after going on 3 years maybe now he would give it a rest before campaign season. Does not look like that is going to happen. No normal person or someone not intent on destroying this forum for grassroot goes on a 3 year obsession with a forum member spreading lies and polluting the forum if they believe in the forum mission or using the forum for activism on and offline. If I leave he will just move on to the next Paul supporter to drive out of the forum and there are not many left here. Good job acptulsa. The forum is a fraction of what it once was for you being the #2 man in starting the fake witch hunt and destroying the discourse from 7/2015 on.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:11 PM
    You mean this not acptulsa's anti-Trump witch hunt thread or calling Ender a Muslim thread? Damn disappointing dude, disappointing. Anyway just in.
    3 replies | 106 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:56 PM
    I suppose if someone is really paranoid but that would be really reaching for it. If I really wanted to fool someone I would have put it in forum quotes and not unusually post like that with FIRST in caps. "Never happened, not my style to ever name call people that disagree with me here." Disagree usually does not apply to personal attacks anyway and besides a few posts later I did say "first". Considering you copy/pasted so many of my quotes in this thread I figured you probably saw it and it was given.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:45 PM
    Right. You are preaching to the choir. +1
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:43 PM
    The 2016 Presidential Forum was where we discuss all candidates policies and it was not the Rands Campaign Form............at first I thought you were serious then I kept reading. LMAO!
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:33 PM
    I added "first" to your reply of my quote and did not use forum quotes. That was intentional to be clear and was not intended as a rewrite but emphasis in what I thought was implied. Anyway I said it again later in thread. I also proved that I was not rewriting history with Ender since I posted the very original exchange. With others here it is simply what I described in the last quote. We could discuss all 17 candidate prior to 7/1/2015 after 7/1/2015 we could not. That was the same time the #nevertrump push went live out the think tanks to shout down any form of rational policy discussion when it comes to Trump.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
  • kahless's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:59 PM
    "Never happened, not my style to ever name call people that disagree with me here. FIRST." My views have not changed and I am just being a realist. If someone posts Trump policy that is a good idea I am not going to bash it because it came from Trump. I will bash it if it is anti-liberty. The same applied for all 17 candidates. As bad as Trump is I still think we are better off with a few policies than Hillary. Even on this I believe Hillary would have went further and we would be discussing a more for reaching form of gun confiscation. If there was a viable 3rd party I would have supported it but there wasn't. The people constantly bitching and moaning do not think this way. They have an unrealistic expectation of where we should be and what is actually possible to the point of being irrational and attacking those that live in the real world.
    430 replies | 4876 view(s)
More Activity
About adissa

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
487
Posts Per Day
0.25
General Information
Last Activity
09-20-2016 12:27 PM
Join Date
11-12-2012
Referrals
0

2 Friends

  1. kahless kahless is online now

    Member

    kahless
  2. Ron Paul in 2008 Ron Paul in 2008 is offline

    Member

    Ron Paul in 2008
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2

09-16-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast

12-13-2016


10-23-2016

  • 08:25 PM - Hidden

09-21-2016


09-19-2016

  • 10:02 PM - Hidden
  • 03:18 PM - Hidden

09-17-2016


09-16-2016


09-15-2016



Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast