compromise
Banned

:) They do that kind of thing to avoid the censor-bots. In addition to reversing the image, I'm pretty sure they reduced the playback speed a bit, too, judging by the audio when characters are speaking, which seems just a tad slow.) Another copy I found gave the characters "squeaky" voices. :eek::D Forbidden fruit is the sweetest fruit.

Basically I get from all crap rfk jr said is im wanting biden to win. No new info just pumping people to biden, Obama/Biden , Reid /Pelosi/ Scumer represent every possible wrong turn country taken in 2 1/2 decades or more, doing is part to get you more . fuck off.

//

Speaking of Star Trek ... THREAD: USAF confirms first AI dogfight Star Trek - S01 E23 - A Taste Of Armageddon https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6g2zgh

//

THREAD: CA-While filming the closing of Oakland's In an Out due to crime, film crew gets robbed

JFC what a farce ...

1/2 ? . that means he is losing

i doubt they are as stupid as they look too

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1780966894310187188 1780966894310187188

//

//

Don't know how based he is in this clip (I haven't seen it yet), but I found it not long after posting the OP (he seems to be making the rounds), so here it is: CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #258: Former Rep. Dennis Kucinich on His Campaign Against the Establishment https://rumble.com/v4q2ufz-former-rep.-dennis-kucinich-on-his-campaign-against-the-establishment.html {Glenn Greenwald | 17 April 2024} v4nhn78

Not a "Tucker on Twitter" item, but relevant, and seems like the best place short of creating a new thread: CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #258: Neocons Attack Tucker's Reputation for Dissent on Israel https://rumble.com/v4q2p7f-neocons-attack-tuckers-reputation-for-dissent-on-israel.html {Glenn Greenwald | 17 April 2024} v4nhhyo

CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #258: SCOTUS Highly Skeptical of Biden DOJ's Jan. 6 Prosecution Theory https://rumble.com/v4q2p8h-scotus-highly-skeptical-of-biden-dojs-jan.-6-prosecution-theory.html {Glenn Greenwald | 17 April 2024} v4nhhzq

https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1780566890437316738 1780566890437316738

https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1780804297439011048 1780804297439011048

//

https://twitter.com/ErinKYSpectrum/status/1780642126168002749 1780642126168002749

https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1780689271327687110

David Hogg tries to "school" Coach on Constitutional law: https://twitter.com/davidhogg111/status/1779980136877633779 & https://twitter.com/3YearLetterman/status/1779986797486833852 https://twitter.com/davidhogg111/status/1780591797120409721 to: https://twitter.com/3YearLetterman/status/1780595173954838684

https://twitter.com/BobMurphyEcon/status/1780594307789128183 Video @ Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1780726615187538385 1780726615187538385 Video @ Rumble:

https://twitter.com/moicanoufc/status/1780762386980303046 1780762386980303046 https://twitter.com/alfredohinny/status/1780727675729973578 1780727675729973578

https://twitter.com/pnjaban/status/1780752668870537457

https://twitter.com/saifedean/status/1780517802614399288 to: https://twitter.com/saifedean/status/1780602295245541473

Those are really good. IMO, Firefly is the best "sci-fi" series, and The Expanse is the best "science fiction" series. There's a lot more "sci-fi" out there than (bona fide) "science fiction" (probably because "sci-fi" is more amenable to general audiences). In my own personal taxonomy - where Firefly is at the "sci-fi" end of the spectrum and The Expanse is at the "science fiction" end of the spectrum - I'd classify Babylon 5 and Battlestar Galactica as "sci-fi". I'd put Star Trek (TOS & TNG, anyway - I'm not familiar enough with the others to say) on the "sci-fi" side of the spectrum, too - but with some tendrils reaching into the "science fiction" side. (Stuff like Star Wars wouldn't go on this spectrum at all - it's a separate sub-genre of speculative fiction I would call "space fantasy".)