12-19-2020, 04:09 PM
Yes, Rand could win an Outsider GOP / Conservative / Libertarian / Populist popularity contest. Those are all the same side, except the Libertarians would rather lose than support a candidate who isn't 100% with them 100% of the time. Not all, but some here. Last time around, Fox wanted Jeb Bush, knew that Rand needed to be knocked out, pumped Trump to hurt Rand, and Trump had too much momentum for Jeb to overcome.
Rand winning or not winning is determined in large part by who the other choices are.
About bad guys - yes, Rand would be better at getting rid of the bad guys than a RINO would be. Like I said before, the outsider GOP, the consefvatives, the populists, the libertarians, the Christians, all do a fairly similar job of identifying the bad guys. And they differ as to their solutions. The MSM, the RINOs, whatever term you want to use for the political faction of the GOP that the media wants to sell to our side, they come up with McCain, Romney and Bush. That's one side, and, our side comes up with Buchanan, Ron/Rand and Trump. Team RINO only comes up with something like "we're a milder version of the Democrats, you'll get 99% with us, and 100% with the Democrats."
This website is ronpaulforums. Ron Paul (and Rand) are GOP, they ran for President and were and are politicians who are GOP. In order to win the nomination, they need votes from people who don't like it that things are garbage now, and that means pointing out the bad guys, and stringing together some solution plan for the awful.
I should point out that's been conventional wisdom for a while, the new model might just be that elections don't matter, and fire is all that's left. I don't want to be arguing against that, it's tricky to pivot on a dime, maybe elections are a worthless joke and fire and bullets are the only way. Libertarians are as bad as they come at being allies in normal politics.
Connect With Us