Anti-Neocon
Member

Is water wet?

Probably just clerical errors, and people had to go through thousands of records to find them. Or "white" is more or less the default, so maybe white crime is slightly overestimated. But I doubt this has anything to do with some sort of intentional agenda.

I'll give you this - the alternatives aren't currently running in the Republican Party primaries polling at more than 0%. So under status quo assumptions, there are no other alternatives. However... Ron Paul was never an approved "option" in 2008 and 2012, and even Trump was hardly an approved option in 2016. The grassroots strengths of the Ron Paul campaigns were not from people saying "well our only options are McCain and Romney". They were from people who said "we can do better and even if we don't win we should try". That particular Ron Paul Forums energy seems completely lacking, with the Trump vs. DeSantis debates, and so on. The pathway from inertia disrupters to inertia preservers is the most troubling path the general community has taken IMO.

It's weird because I felt like the people here should be the most resistant to getting swept up by that kind of narrative but instead yep, mass formation psychosis has swept through. Although it's really just half who have fallen for it, but that half has the most posts.

LMAO no, he was basically offering support for what Pence said, only he was taking objection with the due process part because it took too long and he wanted to get straight to the gun-grabbing. Pence: “Allow due process so no one’s rights are trampled, but the ability to go to court, obtain an order and then collect not only the firearms but any weapons" Trump: “Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms – they saw everything – to go to court would have taken a long time, so you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.”

Maybe it's just that I am looking hard at reality, and you're looking hard at a fictional universe.

"The fight"? What fight? I see him fighting for himself but that's about it.

If there was any consistency and principles in MAGAland, no, but there isn't.

She apparently loves Corey Lewandowski almost as much as she loves Israel. I doubt she'll be picked now.

At least it makes sense for the governor of South Dakota to send out random tweets saying ho much they love Israel.

Her federal record was consistently that of standing with the neocons. Even DeSantis had a significantly better record there. It's no surprise she endorsed Rubio who basically represents the opposite side of the GOP as Rand in the senate. We're talking about someone who could be president if an 80 year old died - do we want more surveillance and foreign intervention? Because that is where she consistently was at. https://thefreedomindex.org/legislator/n000184/

Yeah, two pretty clear enemies of liberty. But Trump does think about himself and personal grievances. Maybe he will think twice when he realizes that Noem endorsed Rubio over himself.

This is a terrible line of attack too, picking on her for doing what kids growing up in Soviet Russia did.

I believe he was even endorsed by Rand & co last time, which he lost but not by a ton. While Tester is probably the most tolerable Democrat in the Senate (he is pretty good on civil liberties stuff and not crazy about overregulation) I don't think there's any question that his race will be one of the most important to win in 2024 for overall liberty concerns. I don't think he officially declared but it seems pretty clear that he's going for it.

I don't really like this narrative that the ADL is doing it for some other agenda. For them, like AIPAC, it's mainly about power and control for their own Jewish Zionist agenda. They want to set the rules for the censorship regime. Without that power it's useless. It's the anti-racism and stuff like that which is actually the cover for what they are about. Maybe the best analogy would be that you have to do your job as a guard to keep your keys to the watchtower, but they really want to be in the watchtower to decide who is let through. It's interesting watching this sail over the head of all the leftists/Marxists who are basically rushing to defend them as they've been conditioned, a lot just due to who is opposing them. Yet these same people will call out AIPAC.

Okay that's way better than expected; it looks like the hashtag reached him. I'm not sure the substance of this case but the ADL is all about information control and it's nice to see a grassroots effort getting in their way. 10 years ago it would've been the AD-who???

It's amazing even having to read that kind of stuff in "Ron Paul Forums".