specsaregood
Member

Good, I hope he steals it then as he is at least twice as good as any of the other cocksuckers running. at least he makes a mockery of politics.

just showed it to the kid. he said, "OMG, that looks EPIC!" He has seen the originals and loves them; I don't think he even knows the stupid remake even exists.

ok, that made me grin. That I will see.

fossilized dino poo is a winner. https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l1313&_nkw=fossilized+dinosaur+poop&_sacat=0

Bed Bath and Beyond sells them for a couple bucks less than that; plus they give out 20% off coupons like they are going out of style -- I've got a stack of about 50 of such coupons on my shelf. My mom has one of the pillows and loves it.

If you can't investigate a candidate that is running for president; then it seems like sitting senators would have to recuse themselves from a senate trial/vote for impeachment as well.

Your reply implies that you don't believe these results. If not, then who do you think is leading in CA, NH, and NV?

Well, there was the little matter of the full and unconditional pardon that Ford granted him.

This whole "drag queen story hour" is so sick and unbelievable that it boggles the mind to figure out how it ever became acceptable or even somewhat common.

seriously, it couldn't be any more obvious. make it so the lender actually evaluates the investment because it matters.

I had to go find the quotes you think you found of me holding a different position. These are the two you bumped: Neither of those are opposed to my current position. In neither one do I say I am against a wall or immigration controls. In both I am talking about RP's position and theoreticals. Yes, RPs freedom approach is ideal. But it aint even close to happening. Let me know when we get rid of all those things I listed, then maybe open borders could work.

I very much doubt you ever found me saying we should not ever build a wall nor that immigration could ever be a problem. I might have made more theoretical posts in my younger age; but nothing so absolutist.

It is not absolutely true; anybody with any management experience could tell you that just adding lots of bodies does not increase productivity. I' pretty sure neither AF nor myself have ever been for any open borders nonsense, except maybe in a theoretical world with no welfare state or federal reserve.

There are no such absolutes. More human resources CAN lead to more productivity and prosperity, not always. Not without training, not without resources invested in them, not without their own drive to be productive and prosperous. Without those things, they are a drain, especially if you feel the need to support them or have to deal with security issues from not supporting them. It is the assumption of those that have determined that many people aren't willing to work/train/invest to be a net benefit. Its the assumption of people that know that the safety net will keep expanding to support people unable or unwilling to work. It is not the opposite of "everything we here at RPFs support.

Once again, why does a kid in daycare need to be vaccinated against an STD?

It certainly doesn't sound like a vaccine that kids in daycare need, right?

More importantly, since its all a single organization and the owners all share the profits evenly; why wouldn't they rig it to get the biggest return? Its not like the owners are actually competing against each other.