Tab Content
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:44 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to devil21 again. Though, a couple of the folks are true liberty advocates. Thanks for the heads up, I’ve felt my time has pretty much expired, so perhaps on to other things, such as focusing more on my weekly meeting groups.
    29 replies | 494 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:57 PM
    PS: they feel they are right and I am wrong because their own majority outnumbers me. Which is why the liberty folks here should be over there.
    29 replies | 494 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:42 PM
    “We’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference” - Johnson ‘63. Until the ‘We the People’ read and understand the Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights, abide by them, and demand the representatives to legislate according to them... The primary effort I am engaged in, aside from getting my ass kicked in by gun forum folks and other brainless neocons, is posting bills, enacted and proposed, and state how they offend/reject the Bill of Rights. Those same folks who say they know and honor the Bill of Rights, even taking oaths to it, make every effort/excuse to set the Bill of Rights aside in order to praise the king. They refuse to contact their reps, because they are happy with current legislation, building the Berlin wall, sensible ‘republican’ gun control, Biometric ID because Trump (R) proposed it, and fully support repeal and replace obama’s-romney-care with a ‘republican’ version. They are good with ending welfare for “illegals”, but not ending it domestically for Americans. So there ya go.
    29 replies | 494 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:53 AM
    Don’t blame me, I didn’t vote that way, I’m only reporting the record.
    29 replies | 494 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:03 AM
    I don’t like anything lower than a 95%. 90% border lining, if not already, neocon. Cumulative Freedom Index Score: 83% Status: Former Member of the House Score Breakdown: N/A (115th Congress: 2017-2018); 87% (114th Congress: 2015-2016); 80% (113th Congress: 2013-2014);
    29 replies | 494 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-12-2018, 07:49 AM
    New Attorney General Nominee William Barr’s Record on Guns Revealed Dec 08, 2018 President Trump said yesterday that he intends to nominate William Barr as Sessions’ replacement. The choice has been greeted by applause from both Democrats and Republicans. Barr is a Bush 41 retread, having served as Assistant Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, and finally as Attorney General. BATFE was under the Department of Treasury during Bush 41’s term and the Department of Justice had only limited authority over firearms. Barr has said little about firearms or gun control during his career, but he is widely considered to be the author of PL 101-647, The Crime Control Act of 1990. The Crime Control Act of 1990 had a number of firearms provisions. The Gun Free School Zone Act is the biggie, but probably the work of Senator Herb Kohl of Wisconsin – not Barr. The GFSZA’s strange rules set the context for MGO v. AAPS, despite SCOTUS finding much of it unconstitutional in Lopez.
    12 replies | 328 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-11-2018, 07:31 PM
    I responded to Swordy in another thread: Quite the conundrum, isn’t it. Sacrifice liberty for security... deserve neither. A. Build a wall restricting human beings, leading to other police state tactics, at tremendous cost in dollars and freedom. B. Let them in, vote for the very same welfare your own government refuses to eliminate.
    25 replies | 432 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-11-2018, 05:29 PM
    I found some free jigsaw puzzles to get you started. Good luck! https://www.thejigsawpuzzles.com
    58 replies | 705 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-11-2018, 04:52 PM
    Quite the conundrum, isn’t it. Sacrifice liberty for security... deserve neither. A. Build a wall restricting human beings, leading to other police state tactics, at tremendous cost in dollars and freedom. B. Let them in, to vote for the very same welfare your own government refuses to eliminate. Either way it costs financially. Because government never ends welfare and steps out of the way to allow free markets to naturally fix the problems. They only compound problems ensuring their own jobs.
    58 replies | 705 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-11-2018, 12:57 AM
    Check out the gun forums. Not only do they love love love kavanaugh, they believe every republican in the house/senate can do no wrong. In fact, they still worship bush.
    16 replies | 319 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-10-2018, 01:57 PM
    I agree, there is no fixing the current system. The problem becomes, those in power will never allow things to transpire to our advantage. An illusion perhaps, but that’s about all.
    13 replies | 400 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-10-2018, 01:48 PM
    Everything is in motion, with no change for the better. It’s now moving exponentially. Certainly those in power are not going to relinquish it. They have been at this for well over a century, and the American people still do not wake up - in fact, they don’t even pretend anymore, and now promote it. After the collapse, does it stay the same? Get worse? At some point in the near future will we be required to make visits to suppress our thoughts? Your thoughts?
    13 replies | 400 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-10-2018, 08:05 AM
    PAF started a thread Sacrifice of Pearl Harbor in History
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/pearl-harbor-day-of-infamy/
    0 replies | 86 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-09-2018, 08:41 AM
    United Nations stated goal is to have every man, woman and child Biometric Identified by 2030. Like Common Core, this playful subscription is another indoctrination method that few, if any, have noticed.
    2 replies | 118 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-09-2018, 08:34 AM
    The United States tax payer funds the United Nations and is a member state. Republicans NOR Democrats have NO intention of pulling out. It is a topic that nobody - politicians, voters or public - is even interested in. Certainly not the U.S. news media. When there is no outcry from the public, things like this become easily accepted. Please share and raise this topic often.
    2 replies | 118 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-07-2018, 05:10 PM
    PAF replied to a thread Rand Paul 2020 in U.S. Political News
    If one is to stick to principle, Justin is not qualified, he is not a nbc.
    60 replies | 2432 view(s)
  • Dori_G's Avatar
    12-07-2018, 01:06 PM
    I suppose it depends from whose perspective you are asking. Families can do a lot for a child's sense of security and future economic and personal outcomes, which is why we want stronger families in the first place. From the perspective of someone with no family support, it seems a bit unfair. But unfairness doesn't mean it's a bad thing. Dori www.LittleLibertarians.com
    33 replies | 1020 view(s)
  • Dori_G's Avatar
    12-07-2018, 01:03 PM
    If you don't educate your children, someone else will. My problem is not with any of these selections. In fact, I'd say many of these selections are part of a well-rounded education. My problem is with the exclusive representation of social justice subject matters as if these are the only topics that exist. Taken alone, any of these selections are just fine. But when catalogs continue to the represent these subjects exclusively - we're going to have a major problem of myopic thinking in the future. The failure to represent a diversity of viewpoints and subject matter is already manifesting in college students in a complete inability to comprehend ideas outside of one's limited worldview. Excerpt:
    2 replies | 265 view(s)
  • Dori_G's Avatar
    12-07-2018, 12:44 PM
    Philosophically, it's a fair question to ask. Is it an unfair advantage? Yes. Is it still something we should strive for, absolutely. Better stronger families make the world a better place. Dori www.LittleLibertarians.com
    33 replies | 1020 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-07-2018, 12:21 PM
    I am posting this on behalf of Lois. If you have questions or wish to contact Lois, please PM me. Here is the PAYS (Pennsylvania Youth Survey) website: https://www.pccd.pa.gov/Juvenile-Justice/Pages/Pennsylvania-Youth-Survey-(PAYS).aspx _____ In 2017, I was the only Board member in Hollidaysburg to vote against administering the PAYS survey in our school district. I did my best to educate everyone I could about the questions that were being asked of 6th, 8th, 10th and 12th graders during school time. Parents have to opt out, not opt in, if they don’t want their kids to take the test.
    0 replies | 91 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-07-2018, 06:01 AM
    The country is doomed. If trump really was MAGA, he would effective immediately END the FedDeptEd. It might be slightly financially painful at first, but it would get common core off the backs and hopefully promote individual thinking again. Without ending the FedDeptEd, doom becomes 100% certain no matter what other efforts are attempted.
    10 replies | 313 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 05:55 PM
    It has varied... minimum 10, as many as 50. The idea is to keep advertising and increase the numbers.
    2 replies | 221 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 05:50 PM
    And here ya go...BAM!!! S-2292, 2492, 6515, 2289 - Criminal Offenses - Weapons
    1 replies | 59 view(s)
  • William Tell's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 04:49 PM
    There are pros and cons to any change in the system, historically the only changes that are made end up having a bad effect. Bottom line though is there is no silver bullet. realistically we need better candidates with better strategies and fundraising abilities. Maybe more regional focus, like the Free State Project, which unfortunately is about to be erased at least for now.
    41 replies | 580 view(s)
  • William Tell's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 04:43 PM
    Look at Lisa Murkowski, she pissed off the Alaska GOP enough that she lost the nomination to Joe Miller. What did she do then? Run and WIN as a write in. None of our guys could do that.
    41 replies | 580 view(s)
  • William Tell's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 04:41 PM
    Yep, maybe, but professional politicians like them never come in third, even when they have scandals. So in the end either Graham wins or the Democrat, as per usual.
    41 replies | 580 view(s)
  • William Tell's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 04:28 PM
    So? Unless you really believe 51% of voters secretly want Ron Paul etc, despite 100 years of actual voter history it doesn't matter. You are increasing the threshold for liberty candidates to win. That's plain stupid. In practice this means that Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn won't even need to pretend to be conservative at all, since they are guaranteed to have your vote when the last ballot is counted.
    41 replies | 580 view(s)
  • William Tell's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 04:12 PM
    People only vote for candidates they know. Normally a third party liberty candidate could potentially win with 34%. In ranked choice voting they need 50% + 1. It should be pretty obvious.
    41 replies | 580 view(s)
  • William Tell's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 03:58 PM
    Can't you two guys just start a fight club thread?
    20 replies | 347 view(s)
  • William Tell's Avatar
    12-06-2018, 03:55 PM
    Anyone with brains should have known that line of thinking is bull, and in the end this system will only increase Leftist control. Ranked voting helps the statist with the highest name recognition/fundraising ability.
    41 replies | 580 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    We need the America First Committee
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About PAF

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
463
Posts Per Day
0.19
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
03-25-2018 08:38 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 07:44 PM
Join Date
02-26-2012
Referrals
0

6 Friends

  1. Dori_G Dori_G is offline

    Member

    Dori_G
  2. randroots randroots is offline

    New Member

    randroots
  3. Shupe5 Shupe5 is offline

    New Member

    Shupe5
  4. The Free Hornet The Free Hornet is offline

    Member

    The Free Hornet
  5. Unknownuser Unknownuser is offline

    Member

    Unknownuser
  6. William Tell William Tell is offline

    Member

    William Tell
Showing Friends 1 to 6 of 6
No results to display...
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

12-15-2018


12-12-2018


12-11-2018


12-10-2018


12-09-2018


12-06-2018


12-04-2018


11-30-2018


11-29-2018



Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast