<heritage enters the chat>
-notice the lack to 12ft tall fence around the White House back then! you could actually eat lunch on the wh grass (within reason) without harrassment/intimidation....prior to 9/11 police state....
I would bet you a crisp Franklin right now that it won't be a long fight at all. Women follow trends as a hivemind (tiktok lives and dies on this) so when the narrative from their "influencers" change, they also do...........and fast, relatively.
(eta: as long as the new narrative does not present as polarizingly against their ingrained/bio/breeding traits. they ignore those attempts. this requires more advanced studies.)
The most you'll see will be a few redacted pages with a lot of black ink reviewed and authorized by the CIA. And then Trump will get to wave them around and say "here they are!".
So that's why he wants to tax, fine and sue private donors to fund his nationalized American University? Got it :rolleyes:
Next question is, how is he going to pay for his federally funded nationalized militarized LEO with immunity?
I'm against free trade agreements written by 3rd parties. If I want an agreement, I'll write one by myself with the party I am trading with. If needed, I'll hire my own attorney at my expense if it needs to go there. Those things are called "bilateral contracts".
That's your entire goal, just like Trump. He wants to nationalize stuff, you want to bring everything up to the federal level instead of local where it should be.
I don't want government telling me how much it will cost and who how when to trade with, why would I want private technocrats to do the same?
Your guy is surrounded by them. In fact, they are among his biggest donors. The billionaire club that he is in.
Wasn't it your guy that told Klaus what a fantastic job he was doing? Have you even looked at Peter Thiel, Vance and others connections?
Israel firster, China is an enemy, pro War on Drugs, pro Police State, pro crypto currency, former Deputy National Security Adviser, need robust budget focused on equipping us for next generation warfare.
But, he's an "R", so it's a "win".
Yipee :rolleyes:
That makes a little better sense. I travel a lot and tune out noise and focus on fun so I never really noticed that before. I'm too "old school" maybe? lol
If he is going to be in the administration I hope Zeldin will eliminate the FedDeptEd, and stay completely out of other areas.
Israel firster, he is awful on foreign policy and as neocon as one can be with an average Freedom Index of 65%. He also voted YES on Law Enforcement Partnership Grants which provides Federal Funding to Local LEO.
https://thenewamerican.com/freedom-index/legislator/z000017/votes/congress-117/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Zeldin
That's definitely a great start and I'll definitely take it! We'll see how much that spreads though. I'm still concerned about Trump's pathetic policy due to the military/leo enforcement complex always demanding more, and more, and more.
:up:
So that we don't derail this thread, if you want to discuss it rationally in the other thread, you can go ahead and bump it and we can continue there. Fair?
Sure, that's fine, he's a good one. I'll leave that for you guys to deal with. In my self-absorbed world, once I give in to that, I may as well go all in, which I refuse to do. I don't want to have faith or trust in government, any more than I would have with a neighbor down the street. I'm trying to to turn people away from big and top-down government, not push them into it ;-)
LOL We'll end here, I'm still dying from laughter over here LOL
To accuse me of saying or promoting "paying taxes to support government programs"???????? :tears:
Stop it I'm dying! :tears:
LOL I never said a word about "paying taxes to support government programs", you got the wrong guy, buddy LOL
Perhaps you took issue with the article Stockman wrote,,, go take it up with him. I merely posted it to show some numbers and graphs.
Yeah, best we stay clear of each other. I'll do my record/financials thing, you do whatever it is that you do/don't do.
It's one thing to have a little fun on the board to lighten things up, it's another to purposely instigate trouble/problems when there wasn't any to begin with.
lol I don't know, you said you were going to make a thread so that I could figure out what wokeness is?
Joking aside, I really don't pay attention to all of that social media stuff and what the kids put out today. All I care about are records, charts and financials, and ways to reduce/eliminate the federal government, and even at the state level for that matter.
Am I way off base with this?
I think I see what you mean
Government created problems require "freedom for me but not for thee". And when they are called out on it, the typical response is: "Don't let the facts hurt my feelings."
And yet, wokeness is dead overnight :rolleyes:
I just asked a simple question. You said "The death of wokeness/Marxism", I simply wanted to know how that can be done all of a sudden.
Btw, if I "embody it", care to give an example? I legitimately don't know what "wokeness" is. As a fiscally conservative anarchist who embraces natural rights, I guess I can be many things, but q-u-eer//Marxist/trans/sex-operation/gay, I can't see myself being the embodiment of any of those things.
Maybe give me a financial chart or a record of something so that I can understand.
Connect With Us