PAF
Member

“I know you are but what am I?” That’s the best you got? ROTFLMFAO!!!!11

Your first two sentences are pure speculation with absolutely no factual data to support them. Your last comment is just pure bullshit. But you already know that.

Now he’s praising the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of 1909? I wonder if he knows that Sen. Nelson W. Aldrich was the very guy who organized the covert meeting on Jekyll Island that gave birth to the Federal Reserve Act? But I’m sur Aldrich had nothing but the best interests of the average American in mind when he helped craft that tariff act. Certainly there couldn’t have been any other motive from a stand-up guy like Aldrich, right? ETA: Aldrich was, in fact, the father in law of old John D. Rockefeller himself. Future vice president Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, his grandson, was actually named after him. At the time Aldrich was well known as a “Rockefeller man” in congress. He represented not his actual constituents but the Rockefeller financial empire. IIRC his reputation among real conservatives and liberty loving Americans was so bad that his involvement with the Federal Reserve Act had to be carefully concealed lest that revelation doom the bill’s chances. As I recall, he even pretended to oppose the bill in a successful effort to dupe enough Americans to go along with it to get it passed. He was a globalist, progressive scumbag and NOTHING he was ever involved in, including the tariff act bearing his name, was good for America or its people.

All that means to me is government "solutions and fixes" to government created problems.

LOL Well, every time he posts something, whatever that is, it give me an opportunity to set the record straight lol :up::tears:

At best he’ll start quoting from Ian Fletcher’s book about how great tariffs are and how horrible free trade is. What he WON’T tell you is that Fletcher is actually on the board of a group called the Coalition For A Prosperous America, a lobbying group for a bunch of rent seeking corporations and industries seeking to enrich themselves unjustly at the expense of American consumers through tariffs and trade restrictions. Fletcher is nothing but a shill lobbyist and his book is just pro-protectionist propaganda. But you didn’t really expect any better, did you?

Everything that I present in the form of facts, data and record is garbage to you. You would have to present to me actual data for me to believe you. So far, every time that I have asked you for such data, you have either logged immediately off or waited some period of time thinking that I would have forgotten about it. Joe Biden 2021 – present* $6.66 Trillion 23.42% Donald Trump 2017 – 2021 $8.18 Trillion 40.43% (one single term) Barack Obama 2009 – 2017 $8.34 Trillion 69.98% 9 (2 full terms)

You sound like a commercial... "but wait, there's more!". So you want me to vote for Trump and show my support for Tariffs while he adds yet another $4 Trillion right off the get go? Ron Paul: The Penn Wharton Budget Model, a think tank headquartered at the University of Pennsylvania, recently released a study claiming former President Donald Trump’s economic plans would add about four trillion dollars to the national deficit over ten years while Vice President Kamala Harris’s economic plans would add about two trillion dollars. If you were serious at all about cutting spending , it seems to me that you would support Kamala, since her spending is less than Trump's, and since Trump donated to her not once, but twice.

Trump needs shoe polish. Against my will, how many charging stations across America will I be paying for under Trump? Elon talks about "government efficiency", wasn't there only like a dozen or so built under Biden? Edit: Oops, it was only 7. This time I'm actually happy about the inefficiencies of government. Biden’s $7.5 billion investment in EV charging has only produced 7 stations in two years

Pfizer, Moderna, Bill Gates, CDC, DARPA... seems the MIC was on board with their directives and all of the travel bans and lockdowns, they even masked up and mandated the jab too. Money is the driver, which facilitated the largest transfer of wealth to the upper 1%. They really don't care by what means. I'm not sure how he could make any enemies while he helped line their pockets. Unless you mean: they hate him across the finish line.

Which is it? Which side of "stop when me when you've heard something you like" are you on? 1. A man of peace and trade who doesn't favor one foreign side above another. or 2. Pro ban, sanction and tariff, China and Iran are enemies, Israel is our friend.

As I understand it ending the fed is on his agenda, immediately following eliminating world hunger, ending poverty and curing cancer. Give the guy a break! He can’t do EVERYTHING all at once you know.

Oh please. I love ta like a brother man, but it’schard to take ignorant comments like this seriously. Read a frekin’ history book ffs.

Your initial statement is patently false. I don’t know where you get these ideas but history clearly demonstrates quite thevreverse.

Let me know when you’ve shrunk government back down to that size. Then, maybe, we can talk.

Please spare me your bullshit straw manning. My commentscwere a direct counterpoint to TheTexan advocating actual isolationism, nothing more. And also please spare us the bullshit lie that tariffs are the causitive agent behind American prosperity, and that free trade destroyed it. Only people naive enough to belive that protectionist shill Ian Fletcher fall for that crap.

Not to mention the fact that isolationist societies throughout history have almost always been backward, stagnant societies that usually suffered under some form of brutal, feudal dictatorships. It’s only been after they’ve abandoned their foolish isolationism that they were able to move in the direction of greater freedom and prosperity, although there are certainly no guarantees that the will/would.

I don’t see much turmoil between Italy and Aruba, or New Zealand and Costa Rica, or Mexico and China. I see all the turmoil caused by the USofA. Is there a way to isolate from the US government, without having it hunt you down to take your money?

That was back when people on the “right” actually had a decent, fundamental understanding of economics. Oh, and they actually opposed, you know, socialism.

I do believe that the nationalist-communists finally found the Golden Key: Get some loud-mouthed billionaire who donated millions to Hillary, Chuck Rangel, Kamala Harris and other high profile democrats, who wanted to KICK Tom Massie out of the Republican Party BTW, who spent $8 Trillion in a single term, let a bullet whiz his ear, go back to destination, and Voilà - they got their selves some more convert voters. Pure awesome :up::tears: Just remember: make certain that you have that "R" after the name, otherwise it won't work :tears:

That would have been more credible if he had not ordered a drone-assassination of an Iranian commander and 6 others, ripped up an existing treaty, and taken $100 Million from a pro-Israeli donor. Ron Paul never would have done those things. Furthermore, he was "anti-war" during a "global lockdown" to allow for the largest transfer of wealth. He is a businessman, after all. We Lose, They Lose: A Reagan-Trump Fusion: If Trump-Reagan fusionists take the helm in a second Trump administration, stockpiling canned goods may take on a renewed importance.

Trump is in Butler again today? Awesome! I'll do my shopping in Youngstown instead! It's cheaper there anyway! Thanks for the heads up!

Ron Paul Institute by Adam Dick Oct 3, 2024 It was wonderful news to many people last week when word came that Julian Assange would speak publicly this week. For a long time it seemed that such a day would never come as Assange suffered in harsh conditions in a British prison under the threat of extradition to the United Sates where he would likely remain captive in similar harsh conditions until death. The good news came in June that Assange had struck a deal to return as a free man to his home country of Australia. Yet, Assange did not come out in public to speak after returning to Australia. He focused on recovering the best he could from the torment imposed on him for exposing the US government’s dirty secrets, including related to wars. In his introductory remarks as his Tuesday testimony at a Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights meeting of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) in Strasbourg, France, Assange addressed his recent maltreatment and his ongoing effort to recover from it, stating: