• tod evans's Avatar
    11 replies | 136 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    5 replies | 271 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 10:03 AM
    20 years of Diplomacy? What diplomacy? Diplomacy like every year staging a massive war game mock invasion of your nation complete with bombers and jets flying righty up to your borders, missile launching ships and air craft carriers, mock missile deployments, and pretend to obliterate your nation even worse than we did in the 1950s. Diplomacy like perpetual sanctions to isolate your country from most of the rest of the world. Diplomacy like blocking trade between North and South Korea or with other nations, and actively interfering and preventing any reconciliation or trade dialogue between North and South Korea. Diplomacy like intentionally sabotaging the Sunshine Policy that was embraced by both countries and would open up trade, dialogue and gave South Korea to create its own industrial enterprise zones inside North Korea, and actually called for process to begin demilitarizing the “demilitarized zone”.
    4 replies | 89 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    26 replies | 202 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 08:31 AM
    Tax cuts are not the reason "the country doesn't have enough money." The country doesn't have enough money because the government takes too much of it (via taxation, printing, and/or borrowing). The government takes too much of it (via taxation, printing and/or borrowing) because it spends too much. Spending is the problem, not tax cutting (no matter how much you try to connect or conflate the two). Taxation, printing and borrowing are problems because too much of those things are being done, not too little.
    139 replies | 1722 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 07:38 AM
    Yes you are absolutely right that it would be a catastrophe. Yes, Washington has air superiority from the get go, but it would not be as quickly and easily as the first gulf war. Even just an air invasion would be more costly than the Washington establishment admits. The vastly larger area, terrain, and hardened target sites alone makes it more risky and costly. Yes, air alone was the ingoing belief for victory for Korea, and Vietnam, and Soviets in Afghanistan, and they all lost in the end. Be skeptical of buying into the sales pitch that air superiority trumps everything and it will be a cakewalk. We’ve heard that over and over before. Of course Washington could and would drops lots of bombs and missiles, but they will still lose jets and pilots. Iran has both S-300 as well as Chinese air defense SAM systems. While limited, it is certainly not nil nor impotent. And the truth is, Washington really does not know how effective Iran’s air defenses are. It won’t be free. Washington will blow up things; kill some people; but they will lose some jets and pilots; and in the end have negligible military effect. It will not accomplish any strategic objective. Not to mention Iran has hardened and secured its most important targets. And of course Iran has tactically scattered its military targets and missile launch locations strategically throughout its very large and mountainous terrain in hard to reach and protected locales. Additionally cheap decoys are probably being used and will certainly be implemented to saturate Washington;s ability to strike targets. Meanwhile Washington has provided plenty of near targets for retaliation. Response would be asymmetrical. Even if Washington launches strikes from near bases, it has 2 aircraft carriers and twenty ships as sitting targets in the Persian gulf for the attack boats and the anti-ship ballistic missiles. In addition Washington has extended plenty of nearby targets in Iraq, Afghanistan and throughout the middle east. Iran has the Sejjil missiles that can reach throughout the middle east. Then there is supplying Shia militia throughout the middle east. Iraq is now an ally of Iran, Shia controlled, and majority Shia. Iran could easily supply Shia militia in Iraq, as well as militia in Afghanistan, wreaking havoc for Washington in the middle east. And then of course there is Hezbollah - man per man perhaps the most effective ground fighting force in the middle east. The only force to take on Israel head to head and against odds and deliver Israel a humiliating defeat. Now Hezbollah is equipped with modern high tech smaller missiles. Response would be asymmetrical and unending. Any air attack on Iran would not come without costs. Then of course even Washington does not dispute that Iran has the capacity to shut down the Strait of Hormuz - trapping any Washington ships and shutting off vital shipping lanes from Saudi Arabia. So of course Washington can drop lots of bombs, but they will not achieve any positive outcome and not come out unscathed.
    15 replies | 375 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 07:35 AM
    Shittin' in tall cotton..... = Doing well
    26 replies | 202 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 07:31 AM
    Smells like the South end of a North bound cow.....
    26 replies | 202 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 07:22 AM
    Might as well piss in a fan is a good-n for "It's going to backfire."...
    26 replies | 202 view(s)
  • Origanalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:16 AM
    I assume they x rayed and found a break/fracture?
    14 replies | 70 view(s)
  • Origanalist's Avatar
    14 replies | 70 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 07:10 AM
    Sounds damn close to mine, I don't measure either but sometimes I'll throw in oregano or onion powder along with the other spices, no anise here either... Salt! I salt the shit out of sausage.... Last batch I did I mixed in a couple pounds of ground cow from the last beef I butchered because the pork was so fatty...
    2771 replies | 100772 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 06:43 AM
    Fuck a bunch of salad! How 'bout sharing that sausage recipe?
    2771 replies | 100772 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    14 replies | 70 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    35 replies | 1122 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Today, 05:28 AM
    April is also Income Tax Deadline Month. Coincidence? I think not ...
    17 replies | 143 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 05:12 AM
    12 replies | 513 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:33 PM
    Well, I'll buy you one. :)
    17 replies | 143 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:33 PM
    I'll try not to spill my drink. Don't want to get in trouble for alcohol abuse.
    17 replies | 143 view(s)
  • Origanalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:59 PM
    written by neil clark saturday april 29, 2017 What would have happened had there been no Iraq War in 2003 and Saddam Hussein had stayed in power? Where would we be today? It’s the 28th of April 2017. Saddam Hussein, president of Iraq, now a member state of the newly reconstituted United Arab Republic (with Syria and Egypt), is celebrating his 80th birthday. There are big processions on a gloriously sunny and very hot day in Baghdad. Among visiting foreign heads of state was Zimbabwe’s 93-year-old President Robert Mugabe, who joked that if Saddam gave up smoking Cohibas and started drinking herbal teas he might even live to be as old as him. However, Western leaders boycotted the celebrations, with British Prime Minister Theresa May – who says (at least ten times a day) that she supports a “strong and stable government” in the UK, denouncing Saddam as a “despicable tyrant.” Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson went even further, calling Saddam “a dreadful mugwump thingymujig.” State television shows Saddam’s favorite movie, The Sound of Music, on a loop. In his address to the nation, the grey-haired Iraqi strongman, now appearing old and quite frail, looks back at his time in power and identifies the avoidance of war in 2003 as a major turning point. A planned US-led invasion of Iraq was averted by mass public protests, an unprecedented level of civil disobedience in Western countries, and threats of mutinies from soldiers, who refused to take part in an illegal enterprise.
    0 replies | 54 view(s)
  • RJB's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:58 PM
    Thanks for the post. I have had hibiscus on my tea rotation for a while.
    11 replies | 136 view(s)
  • Origanalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:57 PM
    A true patriot.
    17 replies | 143 view(s)
  • RJB's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:52 PM
    I'm pouring myself Jameson Irish Whiskey on the rocks. I will practice some responsible drinking tonight.
    17 replies | 143 view(s)
More Activity

36 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    That doesn't surprise me a bit. After all Matt has always been allowed to be here and they censored free speech in 2012 under the guise of appealing to Republicans.
  2. View Conversation
    How has this place been turned upside down? It's already been bad enough that I've hardly even posted in the past 4 years.
  3. View Conversation
    I knew you were.
  4. View Conversation
    You too. I started a business and it sucked up a lot of my time at first.
  5. All cats are scaredy cats.
  6. View Conversation
    Kinda looks like your avatar cat in the lower right getting skeered away:
  7. View Conversation
    WRT your rep question, I try to stay in the safer zone, but I wander into danger zones sometimes. Usually when I'm feeling silly or rather daring.
  8. View Conversation
    Thanks for having a sense of humor. The others in the picture thread seem to have sand in their vaginas or something tonite... :/
  9. View Conversation
    BRING BACK TEH AVATAR KITTEH!! I miss that fella.
  10. View Conversation
    I miss you.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 36
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
About Origanalist

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):


Quote Originally Posted by misterx View Post
Yeah, I like cops. They keep the streets safe. Get over it.

Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
The Fed is NOT safe from audit, Trump has said he wants to audit the fed and we may have some bills coming up soon.

Trump is helping Rand pass his healthcare plan, if you think Trump actually supported RyanCare then you are foolish and you need to go read the threads where I addressed this topic. Rand was talking to Trump 2-3 times a week, and Rand told Trump straight up it wasn't going to pass, it didn't have the votes. Trump knew it wasn't going to pass, so he supported it to make sure it was all Paul Ryan's failure and none of it could be blamed on him. Trump hates Paul Ryan.

Trump is going to help save Syria, with Russia's help.
Quote Originally Posted by Mordan View Post
It is not about brainwashing. You can support Trump for practical reasons. I think Danno is right about the Syria missile strikes helping Trump politically in the US. The media stopped talking about the sickening russian narrative. Proof again it was just a hoax to manipulate the public opinion.

Trump made a good call as a politician. Libertarian souls can bitch all they want about principles and being conned. Trump is going to disappointed again. I have enough hairchest.

Just answer the question. Which game is Trump playing?


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
04-02-2016 10:20 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 07:43 AM
Join Date

27 Friends

  1. aGameOfThrones aGameOfThrones is offline


  2. AZJoe AZJoe is offline


  3. BV2 BV2 is offline


  4. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline


  5. CaptLouAlbano CaptLouAlbano is offline


  6. ClydeCoulter ClydeCoulter is offline


  7. DamianTV DamianTV is offline


  8. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline


  9. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline


  10. green73 green73 is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 27
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


  • 11:21 AM - Hidden


  • 11:48 AM - Hidden


  • 04:39 PM - Hidden






  • 03:21 PM - Hidden


  • 08:21 PM - Hidden


Page 1 of 154 1231151101 ... LastLast




Page 1 of 154 1231151101 ... LastLast