Tab Content
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-24-2016, 07:30 AM
    You know this is very similar to what law enforcement agencies commonly do to those they have instituted a clear cut case of excessive force upon, they will doctor their police report with lies, charge the individual with a variety of misdemeanor and felony charges, arrest and book them into jail, and then the DA will actually prosecute them--even when there is video supportive to the defendant, while pushing hard for a plea bargain or else know at least one or two of the charges will stick and in either instance shelter the municipality from what would have otherwise been a large payday civil suit. Ultimately, it is not about justice or necessary revenue generation, it's about maintaining the public's perception and presumptive authority of government.
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-24-2016, 06:38 AM
    There is no conspiracy to hide them, only to prevent them from being used as precedent (star decisis) in memorandums. The proof you seek is in the simple fact that USSC has refused certiorari (review) on every income tax case involving an individual arguing that their livelihoods and core renumeration is not taxable by the federal government without apportionment. The proof is staring you right in your pudgy, greasy face. Negative, that does not help you any: "when a return of tax is required under this title or regulations, the person required to make such return shall", as we are still stuck here at step-one.
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-24-2016, 05:57 AM
    Notice: “If any person liable to pay any tax”; thus by your liberal meaning, any tax, actually means EVERY tax, wherever. There are three key aspects considered by this Statute (1) levy on property or rights to such property, (2) liens for future payments of, and (3) ‘notices of levy’ upon—not the incomes, but the salaries or wages of—federal employees of every classification. And we know that Congress cannot abscond from it Constitutional (5th Amend.) requirements thereby as to “any person” in the positive and “no person” in the negative: “No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” It cannot be made any more clearer: “Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official.”
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-24-2016, 04:15 AM
    What an utterly ignorant, insultingly tawdry article. Not sure your point of posting other than that you agree to the points of it--which casts you into the realm of being a jackass.
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 03:47 AM
    Of course you won't find any as such cases are unpublished opinions and/or are administrative court cases specific only to that individual plaintiff, such as via the U.S. Tax Court.
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 03:17 AM
    That is the curious thing about the individual income tax, for every other class of income tax it's both made "liable" and "imposed", with exception to the individual income tax, it is only "imposed", but never made "liable".
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 03:12 AM
    No, you are fixating on a single, solitary point to thereby discount the whole of the article. And I called you out on it, your well known laziness does not grant you exception to a well acknowledged principle, you want to be silent on the remainder, then you are determined to be in its agreement. Such is by no means a logical fallacy. ETA: Now, if you wish only to argue only one or a few points that is perfectly fine and acceptable, but you have no entitlement to pooh-pooh the entire article in result.
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 03:03 AM
    No, I was referring to this, which is your own writing, not a quote of mine:
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-18-2016, 12:31 AM
    Would not be the same population density and it does not provide the same psychological impact or elicit the same irrationally heightened response in fear.
    77 replies | 165 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-18-2016, 12:20 AM
    Congratulations DHS and TSA you have managed to devise an environment for any willing "terrorist" to cause catastrophic damage on any countless number of holidays throughout the year--for "terrorists" no longer have a need to hijack aircraft, they can simply orchestrate a coordinated attack about the endless three-hour TSA screening lines. ...And realize that with every single unwarranted, demeaning, groping search; with each insulting, pointless interrogation; with each distortion of fact and reality; with each new ambiguous or ineffectual agency "rule"; with every baited ridicule directed towards those that question your agency's motives or purpose you are in-fact effecting the true motivation and goal of the "terrorists" you assert yourselves to be protecting your travelers from. Ergo, they no longer need to attack us--AMERICANS, they have got you doing that task just fine on their behalf.
    77 replies | 165 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    05-17-2016, 11:52 PM
    Remember in 2015 the debt clock was frozen for many weeks, and also covertly rolled back. It is fact, the national debt averages over $1-trillion in new debt each year that is over more than a decade now--sure there are years were it is claimed just under a trillion dollars in new debt, while other years new debt breaks that trillion threshold. I don't think I made the claim that your asserting; however, that claim is depicted within the findings of the ‘Private Sector Survey on Cost Control’ (PSSCC)—The Grace Commission Report, viz., nearly each dollar taxed is owed to interest on the accruing national debt—and that was in 1982! My point is that this debt CANNOT ever be repaid, it is an anchor around the necks of the entire populace and their progeny. The point can be observed in this: http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/presidents/thomas-jefferson/letters-of-thomas-jefferson/jefl219.php
    210 replies | 4563 view(s)
No More Results
About Wheeljack

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
78
Posts Per Day
0.05
General Information
Last Activity
05-07-2016 10:42 AM
Join Date
01-30-2012
Referrals
0

1 Friend

  1. Weston White Weston White is offline

    Member

    Weston White
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...