Suzanimal
Member

Isaiah 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound.

https://x.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1835726033712029922

https://x.com/Bubblebathgirl/status/1835657341015892177 1835657341015892177

:D All part of the Master Plan ...

https://x.com/an_capitalist/status/1832422806086156798 to: https://x.com/an_capitalist/status/1832422836428009739 {Voluntaryist Keith @an_capitalist | 07 September 2024} The Ultimate Case Against the Churchill Cult By Keith Knight, Managing Editor @LibertarianInst

https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1835366493711692099 & https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1835367079089959221 {Tom Elliott @tomselliott | 15 September 2024} I’ve grown up practically worshipping Churchill. To me he was always history’s personification of a total badass with unshakable resolve. It also helped that he was hilarious (often spontaneously), wrote some of the finest English I’ve had the pleasure of reading, had charisma capable of rallying a beleaguered nation, and somehow did it all while basically being a functioning alcoholic. His autobiography “My Early Life, Thoughts & Adventures,” is one of my favorite books; by the time he was 27 he had already lived what would be a dozen lives for normal people (did you know he was taken as a PoW during the Second Boer War but managed to escape thanks to some miraculous good luck … imagine how differently history might have evolved had he had his luck gone the opposite way). Embracing my habit of pursuing the most unpopular opinion possible on every possible topic, mark me down for believing Churchill’s due a reconsideration. Over the years I’ve learned more about him that I like much less. Specifically how he had the ability to help resolve a British empire-induced famine in India but chose not to, unapologetically used mass starvation as a weapon against German citizens, supported the use of chemical weapons, and was pretty clearly involved in the sinking of the Lusitania. He certainly wasn’t above facilitating the deaths of UK-aligned noncombatants if their deaths could be effectively exploited in a much larger conflict. And I don’t think this is the kind of “presentism” analysis progressives are so often using against slave-owning Founding Fathers. Because at the time Churchill wasn’t in the mainstream on any of these issues — he was always pulling Overton’s Window toward more death.

The following message has been brought to you by the Department of Déjà Vu All Over Again: THREAD: FL - Shots fired at Trump golf course while Trump playing

They amount to the same thing. The reason "this thread up here" is precisely because "the cat story became the immigration narrative for the past week". Vance and Trump are Johnnies-come-lately to the story. The story didn't blow up because they started talking about it. They started talking about it because it blew up.

I split it from the "Invasion USA" thread: The story was already getting traction, and I anticipated that many more electrons would be spilled on the subject. On that, I was not incorrect.

1 John 3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #332: Neocon Queen Victoria Nuland ADMITS Not Wanting to End Ukraine War Diplomatically https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rg2Rzturj4Q {Glenn Greenwald | 14 September 2024}

Am I Racist? - Movie Review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh3p_MsIW_A {Jeremy Jahns | 15 September 2024} Not many mainstream reviews of this one.....so now I gotta review it. Here's my review for Matt Walsh's social experiment film "AM I RACIST?"

She will never do another interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSo5pf4vQnI {Decoy Voice | 15 September 2024} Vice President Kamala Harris finally did her first solo interview since becoming the Democrat Presidential Candidate. The interview aired on television seemed reasonable, but that was apparently a heavily edited version of what she actually said. This is probably why they avoid interviews, debates, and hard questions for her.

Kamala EMBARRASSES Herself In Interview https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/kamala-embarrasses-herself-in-interview:d {Actual Justice Warrior | 15 September 2024} In this video I discuss the absolute failure the first solo Kamala Harris interview with ABC Philadelphia. Sources: Interview: https://youtu.be/9AunRg_V078 Voters Need More Info: https://www.foxnews.com/media/undecided-voters-tell-nyt-needed-more-from-kamala-harris-debate-she-still-has-impress-me

He should have broken some windows on the way out, too.

THREAD: ABC Moderator Linsey Davis Admits: ‘Fact-checking’ Was Only Planned for Trump

//

Trump Survives AGAIN https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/trump-survives-again:6 {Actual Justice Warrior | 15 September 2024} In this video I discuss the second time in around 2 months that president Trump nearly lost his life at the hands of a would be assassin. Sources: Article: https://nypost.com/2024/09/15/us-news/gop-dems-react-to-would-be-trump-assassination-grateful-but-concerned/

Fixed: You can tell the news is lying any time they use the words "baseless", "false", or "falsely"

https://x.com/Snowden/status/1835460582855631350 to: https://x.com/Snowden/status/1835468532789703101

Joe Rogan Experience #2190 - Peter Thiel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klRb0_BAX9g {PowerfulJRE | 16 August 2024} Peter Thiel is an entrepreneur and investor. He co-founded PayPal, made the first outside investment in Facebook, and co-founded Palantir Technologies, where he serves as chairman. Thiel is a partner at Founders Fund and leads the Thiel Foundation, which funds technological progress and long-term thinking. He is also the author of the #1 New York Times bestseller Zero to One.

Always wise advice, comrade. I'm sure the commissariat will let us know what our opinion should be if and when they need it.

It's not hard to believe. No one said they don't exist. No one said they are "all feds". Why is it at all hard to believe that the feds would be surreptitiously involved (especially given that the FBI is apparently already exploiting the opportunities afforded by the situation)?