Tab Content
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 08:02 AM
    7 replies | 109 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 06:33 AM
    John 1:3 | KJV All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
    1025 replies | 60951 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 06:00 AM
    Seven Reasons To Be Highly Skeptical Of The Gulf Of Oman Incident In a move that surprised exactly zero people, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has wasted no time scrambling to blame Iran … Pompeo concluded before hastily shambling off, taking exactly zero questions. Here are seven reasons to be extremely skeptical of everything Pompeo said: 1. Pompeo is a known liar, especially when it comes to Iran. Pompeo has a well-established history of circulating blatant lies about Iran … he recently told an audience at Texas A&M University that when he was leading the CIA, “We lied, we cheated, we stole. We had entire training courses.” 2. The US empire is known to use lies and false flags to start wars.
    72 replies | 645 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 05:43 AM
    Trump’s Pompeo’s claim is devoid of any thought. Quick initial impressions from Trump/Pompeo’s “smoking gun” video: Nothing in the video confirm the boat is even Iranian. One could just as easily claim is Saudi, or U.S. or Israeli, or UAE or Omani, or anyone else The video does not establish a “limpet” mine or anything at all attached to the ship. It is hard to tell if there is even anything being removed at all. From the movement of ther people if anything is being removed from the ship, it would appear a magnetic anchor tethering the boat to the ship. Interestingly the edited video is only 1 minute 40 seconds long. Where is the video showing the boat approaching the ship? Where is the rest of the video? Might it show on approach the crew attaching a magnetic tether to the ship? Why are they hiding all the rest of the video of what the boat did and its approach? The US government states the video was taken at 4:10 p.m. local time – approximately 10 hours after the explosion. So the US government and US Navy just left the smoking gun evidence sit there for ten hours to purportedly allow the alleged culprits to come back 10 hours later in broad daylight, after already rescuing crews, and remove the “smoking gun” evidence. The alleged Iranians supposedly came back to the “scene of the crime” 10 hours later, in broad daylight, wearing reflective vests, with a crew that appears to be up to 18 people on the boat to remove the “smoking gun” evidence that the US government just let sit there for 10 hours. The video itself is of such horrible quality as to call into question its use, alleged conclusions and legitimacy. The US government has bases all around the gulf including in Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman as well as ships throughout the Persian gulf. Washington has made it a hotbed. US has surveillance drones, and surveillance planes and surveillance satellites watching everything throughout the gulf. And this alleged retrieving of the “smoking gun” evidence occurred ten hours after the blast. The US government would have had a litany of surveillance focused on the event by that time. Why is the only video horrendously grainy, out of focus, zooming in and out and shaky? Why is the video converted to black and white? This is not FLIR video, this is regular video. Why is this surveillance video converted to black and white?
    72 replies | 645 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Today, 05:26 AM
    "Master and and commander" ? "sole source of power"? what retarded comic book are these lines coming from? So SS would say that Obama could have committed any act whatsoever to obstruct investigation into the Obama administration wrongdoing regardless of law? Where was SS arguing Obama can do anything he wants to to obstruct any investigation by Congress or obstruct any special prosector Congress appoints. That for any investigation into Hillary crimes or Obama FISA spying or investigation into Eric Holder corruption. It is to say that it would be perfectly appropriate and acceptable for Obama to have his attorney general meet with Hillary's husband bill on a jet on a tarmac to discuss strategy to close an investigation against Hillary. Or it would be perfectly appropriate for Obama to authorize his Sec of State to destroy emails crucial to an investigation, or allow his attorney general to funnel weapons to various Mexican cartels to be used against US law enforcement officers, or on and on .... Nixon was impeached not for the Watergate break-in which it was acknowledged he had nothing to do with, but for obstruction of justice after the fact. To say it is impossible for a president to obstruct justice is to say it would be perfectly legal for Obama to threaten investigators, bribe jurors, blackmail judges, destroy evidence. Obama would have been fully within his legal rights to threaten judges. No, being a political office holder of any level is not license to break the law. SS is reaching now reaching the heights of absurdity in the never–ending quest to kneejerk defend all lunacy that is Trump.
    33 replies | 372 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:34 PM
    Yerp. Let me know when Trump saves Assange- then I might take his bratty tweets about the press a bit more seriously.
    10 replies | 109 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:29 PM
    Read the fucking article.
    50 replies | 606 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:23 PM
    Yes- it is stealing- we have no business sanctioning anyone- if we don't like them then ignore them. Iran hasn't started a war in 100+ years & yet the US Almighty calls them the biggest terrorists in the ME. Read some real truth.
    50 replies | 606 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:07 PM
    Oh, I totally agree with you. Just remarking on how every generation seems to get upset because the rising generation ain't just like they were.
    137 replies | 1287 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:04 PM
    Good grief- learn some real history & read the OP- we have staged coups in their country & been stealing their resources for 75+ years. We have called them the bad guy so the average joe will agree to all the crap we have done to them. The solution is GTF outta their space & leave them alone. NO sanctions. NO coups. NO stealing their resources. NOTHING.
    50 replies | 606 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    45 replies | 952 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:00 PM
    None of these comments provide anything whatsoever to to support the false claim that Amash "supports the Deepstate use of FISA fraud". SS' list of points by Amash confirms the claim as false. As to the collateral issues - "fruit of the poisonous tree" refers to evidence obtained from an unlawful search. None of the alleged obstruction events came from any unlawful search. These are events that happened months and years after the FISA warrant. None of the evidence of the alleged obstruction was obtained from the FISA warrant. Is a defendant's believes the investigation frivolous or unlawful they can contest on those issues. That belief however is not a permit permit a defendant free rein to commit to put political pressure investigators, or judges, or tamper with witnesses. One corruption does not justify another. SS would be better off arguing no evidence of any obstruction rather than arguing that it is appropriate for a politician to use the power of his his office to pressure and influence investigators and witnesses.
    33 replies | 372 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:32 PM
    19 replies | 1094 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:27 PM
    502 replies | 15921 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:25 PM
    First, this statement confirms nothing to support that Amash "supports the Deepstate use of FISA fraud". Secondly, no, a politician corruptly breaking laws to obstruct justice does not become ok simply because the politicians believes the investigation is corrupt. That like saying its ok to break the law because you are only breaking the law to refute others who broke the law. That's nonsensical and has no foundation in any American law. And no opposing subsequent crimes is not endorsement of prior abuse of process. For instance a police officer may hide evidence or destroy evidence of in a case where the defendant actually committed terrible murders. Opposing the corrupt obstruction of justice by the officer after the fact, does not mean you endorse the underlying murders committed by the murderer. You may disagree with Amash's position on obstruction based on lack of evidence of obstruction, and that is a proper argument. Much better than making up falsehoods about Amash's position. I have yet to see any sufficient evidence of any obstruction. However that is based on lack of evidence, not because of a belief that politicians should abuse their power in corrupt ways to rig investigations simply because they believe the investigation is corrupt.
    33 replies | 372 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:57 PM
    AZJoe replied to a thread Happy Father's Day! in Open Discussion
    15 replies | 113 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:56 PM
    AZJoe replied to a thread Happy Father's Day! in Open Discussion
    15 replies | 113 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:54 PM
    Baloney. Straight up lie. Quit pushing lies. Amash has always opposed the entire FISA program and its warrantless spying. Disagree with Amash, fine, but try disagreeing with what he actually says instead of makign up lies about his positions. To make up lies is to admit you cannot dispute his actual position. Amash never cited or referred to anything obtained from the FISA fraud for his impeachment argument. Amash's arguments for impeachment have nothing to do with any evidence obtained by the fraudulent FISA abuses. Amash himself refers to the underlying charges and the investigation as frivolous. Amash's basis for impeachment has to do with Trump's conduct AFTER the FISA fraud allegations. 1130533764310945797
    33 replies | 372 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:49 PM
    If Iran had left the deal, we would be bombing them. In fact there is some thoughts that DC may be trying to get this to happen, even though we're already out of the deal. The hypocrisy is that Iran has ALWAYS been in accordance about nuclear weapons & our own gov has said so. It signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty and held to it. Israel would not sign & is estimated to have 200-400 nuclear war heads- but Iran's the bad guy. :rolleyes:
    50 replies | 606 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:41 PM
    Agree- seems like every generation bashes the upcoming one because they don't do things exactly the same. I remember my grandparents talking about how swing dance was "evil" when they were growing up & now there are groups who teach kids swing dance to protect them from the "evil" music of today. LOL- some things never change.
    137 replies | 1287 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    72 replies | 645 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    72 replies | 645 view(s)
  • AZJoe's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:34 PM
    BabylonBee (sat) - John Bolton: 'When Has The Government Ever Lied About Attacks On Ships In A Gulf Somewhere Just To Provoke War?'
    72 replies | 645 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:32 PM
    They want something I don't want.
    30 replies | 207 view(s)
  • Danke's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:30 PM
    We live in a circus.
    11 replies | 123 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:21 PM
    “Mass Sterilization”: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine?
    7 replies | 109 view(s)
More Activity

81 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    LMAO. Don't tariff me, bro!

    Remy is the Weird Al Yankovic of libertarianism.

    (Or is Weird Al Yankovic the Remy of pop music ... ?)
  2. View Conversation
    1. Everyone should have at least one banana costume.
    2. Obviously, your youngest son has superb judgement and excellent taste in berries and/or berry-related matters.
    3. Pro Tip: When wearing (one of) your banana costume(s), always keep an eye out for deadly black tarantulas (especially when on a boat during sunrise hours).
  3. View Conversation
    It's sorta a mental reaction where if people talk shit about me I use up my cursing vocabulary and try to unnerve the guy as much as possible. Learned it in Middle School.
  4. View Conversation
    They accused me of being a puppet after going out of their way to necropost on my old thread even though that thread was 5 months old and I sorta got into a pissing match.
  5. View Conversation
    This isn't one of my better days. I'm sorry.....<.<
  6. View Conversation
    Thank you!!
  7. View Conversation
    That was the best pic yet - but the flag patch needs to be replaced ...

  8. View Conversation
    We all float down here ...

  9. View Conversation
    thanx suz... let the good times roll... rock&roll that is.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 81
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
About Suzanimal

Basic Information

Date of Birth
September 29
About Suzanimal
Drinking wine
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
I'm an enthusiastic sign waver.:)

I refuse to upgrade my minivan because of my Ron Paul stickers. <---That's worth 5 stars, I drive a 1998 Plymouth Grand Voyager.:(

I try to live by example. Homeschooling, avoiding paying taxes whenever possible, planning for the collapse...

I've donated money to Ron Paul, RPI (Christmas donations in the names of my Democrat in-laws:)), Mises Institute.

Attended Ron Paul rallies and Mises conferences. I met Lew Rockwell at Mises, we're BFF's now.:cool:

Most importantly, I talk to people about liberty.:)
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Fashion Expert


Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.
Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
01-08-2019 12:35 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 04:03 AM
Join Date

34 Friends

  1. angelatc angelatc is offline


  2. AZJoe AZJoe is offline


  3. Cap Cap is offline


  4. DamianTV DamianTV is offline


  5. Danke Danke is offline


    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
  6. DevilsAdvocate DevilsAdvocate is offline


  7. donnay donnay is offline


  8. Dr.3D Dr.3D is offline


  9. Ender Ender is offline


  10. Grandmastersexsay
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 34
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast


  • 03:32 PM - Hidden





  • 09:19 PM - Hidden


  • 07:04 PM - Hidden
  • 06:37 PM - Hidden





  • 07:45 AM - Hidden



  • 04:49 PM - Hidden









Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 473 1231151101 ... LastLast





Page 1 of 473 1231151101 ... LastLast