eleganz
Member

In 2016, there was a fair chance Bernie could've won against Trump but in 2020, Breadline Bernie has no shot. Trump has a good economic record to stand on while he can draw a clear contrast to Bernie's America. Working Americans won't want to take that type of gamble simply because Trump makes childish tweets.

I get the general idea he was trying to express but it would've helped his case if he provided actual examples. He basically just rambled about how it was unconstitutional for 6 straight minutes.

Maybe just kicking him on his way out the door. That was a big win for the dems so they want to rub it in, albeit with some very suspicious election results.

As I've been saying, there is a more than decent shot that this impeachment will not pass. The fact that this democrat is on Fox news telling Fox news viewers that she's undecided is a big hint towards where Trump district democrats are leaning.

Don't know what you're talking about. I like Amash. I do reserve the right to call out when he is sabotaging his own chances at re-election, which is the opposite of what he is supposed to be doing since we all supported getting him to congress in the first place. He called it quits the second he went independent. Maybe the Libertarians will type encouraging messages online but won't be giving him money because you know he will lose.

Zir will deflect and won't disclose zir's political position but the tone will tell you where zir stands. Whatever Justice Democrats say, Zir will repeat.

In the final week, Corbyn doubled down on hardcore socialist policies, hoping for some sort of solidification of support. That has caused them to lose bigly.

Lol whatever you want to think man, Amash is not going to be in congress 2020.

Seems like a pointless effort. They won't get it passed. Will Senate dems voluntarily recuse? meh... Right after the initial hearing began, I saw democrats already adopting the talking point, "impeachment is constitutional, not a court of justice", thats when they realized it was a sham.

They know they won't qualify and are trying to get ahead of it and rally the base, and maybe raise some money. I'd much prefer her on stage over Yang, does anybody know if he will qualify?

Its about what Iowa and NH thinks. And polls today may not be representative of what happens when Iowa caucuses begin. The race is still fluid, Biden, Sanders, Warren, and Buttplug all have an about equal shot at this thing. I am curious, is America ready for a gay president? he'll win the left and most moderates who want to be hip with social justice, but will the christian right be enough to reject teh gheiz?

Right, of course Justin retired simply because he wants to spend more time with his family and "find himself". :sarcasm: He was done, he knew it, his team knew it, running again would be a waste of time. He already has a strong pro-Trump opponent. He began digging his electoral grave years ago. Heres the thing, if he is happy with this conclusion, great, I'm happy for him. But if his goal was to represent liberty as long as possible in congress, then that would be a big fail.

A lot of you should consider why Amash can't keep his seat but Massie can. Is Massie any LESS "libertarian" than Justin? Then why is he much more likely going to skate towards re-election next year? Its ok to disagree with Trump and call him out, but when you can't peel yourself away from the desperation that the MSM and DNC reeks of, then you might have a problem. How was Ron able to stay in congress all those years through both GOP and DEM party control, despite sticking to his guns? He had the respect of both parties, he didn't go down a rabbit hole of derangement every time a "statist" came into the oval. Ron kept his cool throughout some of the biggest anti-liberty scandals and legislations going back decades. Justin is gone after one term of Trump. Amash did this to himself, come next year the three amigos will be no more, unless Eric Brakey wins.

Based on hearsay. Wow... I'm still thinking there is a big chance impeachment won't pass the house.

I heard from someone that heard from someone that Obama definitely partook in a quid pro quo scheme. It is of my opinion that Obama INDEED committed an impeachable offense!

Maybe with FREE $12k/year, some inner city genius can finally have the time to discover time travel for #YangGangBang2020 to go back in time and swat that can of whipped cream away.

Blonde guy in the back was the only one that knew exactly what was happening. He resigned in his mind on the spot. #YangGangBang2020

Now why'd you go and bring juleswin into #CreamGate ?

If you don't have the sensibility to know how that would be perceived, you shouldn't be running the country. Universal Basic Idiocy

Chick fil A is highly successful even with all the SJWs hating them. They should NOT have changed the formula but I suppose shareholder values overpowered founding values, which is normal as companies scale up. Now we will see if going woke will be a net plus or minus for them.

You'd think any reasonable sharp witted adult could get the actual truth out of a lying 6 year old. Did they literally just ask her a rehearsed question where she simply answered yes? Where was the cross examination? Just seems so odd. We all know when children are lying, especially 6 year olds.

But 27 of 27 used guns so its definitely guns! extra derp...

Not surprising with knowing that most military are younger and we all know young people love t3h br3adlin3z

Its because after 2016, the DNC lost the trust of their members. Now Dem donors just give directly to the candidates and superpacs instead of the DNC.

Too many words. You could've just said, eleganz, you sir are correct in that I will not be clicking your link. Then I would've said damn straight. Well...damn straight.

100% correct, otherwise you woudn't be running from the facts like your ass was on fire. You know what else is 100% correct? The fact that I know you won't click on this.

You're wasting bandwidth. Typing but saying nothing. Seems to. You saw wrong but are more than welcome to go back and read it so you can comprehend what I was saying. But you seem to care enough about the dog and pony show to take part in it. Why is that. A lot of seeming around here, isn't there?

r3volution 3.0 you're inconsistencies are amazing. Quite entertaining for somebody who claims to be a fully principled libertarian, yet can't even answer to his own words.

And that folks, is how you lose a debate.

Are you really that deathly afraid to confront anything I am saying directly? The last link I gave you was a clip from PBS. I asked you if you wanted the blue pill or the red pill, you obviously chose blue by pretending the link is still from Tucker so that you don't have to see the truth. I always know exactly what your responses are going to be because its easy to predict TDS and you consistently prove me right. This is a joke man, check your delusions. There is not enough space in my signature for all of your gaffes.