Yesterday, 04:38 PM
There's lots of good evidence. As 1 example, in the adjudication process a challenger repeatedly witnessed that over-voted ballots were always going to Biden, regardless of what was on the ballot. If there were two intentional marks for President, one for Trump and one for Biden, it went to Biden. If someone marked green party and Biden, it went to Biden.
The challenger tried to raise a challenge. The election worker refused. The challenger went to the floor manager. The floor manager refused to record the challenge. The challenger went to the supervisor, and the supervisor's supervisor, who refused to record the challenge.
In Michigan by law, whether an election worker agrees with the challenge or not, ballot challenges have to be recorded. It's not a matter of discretion. The only reason that an observer's challenges shouldn't be recorded is if the observer was being disruptive/abusive, which we have no reason to believe was the case.
There are numerous other witnesses who testified similar stories: entire buildings of election officials just completely ignoring Republican challenges. Which means that 100's of thousands of votes were being counted in a manner that was both contrary to state law and permissive of fraudulent behavior.
Many of the court rulings basically said "proving election laws were broken is not enough, you have to prove fraud". Which A) is a fucked up standard that has never been applied elsewhere, and B) its really fucking hard to prove that fraud occurred when all the challenges to fraud were refused to be recorded.
Connect With Us