Snowball
Member

Personally I suspect foul play Defense-Secret level technologies may be in the hands of cell groups operating in the US

the only comments I have about the footage are in post 100: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?562075-TN-4-dead-at-mass-shooting-at-Nashville-Christian-school&p=7164287&viewfull=1#post7164287 there you will see a YT link, and the photo. Many tweets have the different sneakers photo. It was indeed directly cropped from the surveillance and police cam videos. And the two pairs are for sale on Amazon. I also think the camo folds on the pants are different lengths. Regarding the cop that yelled to get away from the gun, that's not towards the dead body. He sounds far away. Regarding the possibility of a tremor at the end from the wrist, I acknowledge that but unless I know how long she's been dead, or if she's merely dying and not dead, it can't be guessed, without more info. I said it because of the possibility that the person on the ground is a crisis actor. The difference in sneakers is real. Just that alone blows the whole story out to kingdom come.

wake me up when they are asked why the perp has different sneakers going in and being dead, the arm moving when dead, and the cops yelling at another person to get away from the gun when she's on the floor dead. everything else is just being a tool.

Twitter Ban on MTG for 7 days - it's not her phrase "Trans Day of Venegeance'. It's the freaking actual event name. and she is banned. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=trans+vengeance&t=ffsb&ia=web&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.msn.com%2Fen-us%2Fnews%2Fother%2Ftwitter-suspends-marjorie-taylor-greenes-account-after-trans-day-of-vengeance-post%2Far-AA19cy5Z&pn=1 Where is Elon ? lol.

It looks like the DS is trying to instigate more violence, so they can crack down. Crack down on surveillance and laws, Christian groups. There is shadiness about this place. Look at the political connections and abuse history. Read: https://www.wadeburleson.org/2014/05/austin-davis-covenant-presbyterian-and.html?showComment=1405086078978&m=1#c2786320466872724858 https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/andrewkaczynski/co-author-of-mike-huckabee-books-was-accused-of-child-molest https://law.justia.com/cases/tennessee/court-of-appeals/2016/m2015-02154-coa-r3-cv.html Considering the huge glaring problems in the police body cam and cc cam footage, outlined in previous posts here, there is no reason any longer to take the official narrative as the truth. It's out the window. Something else happened, and for other reasons. The pastor is new, since 2018. Perhaps his daughter was targeted. Perhaps the adults shot were targeted. Sadly enough, like in all of these shootings, surprise, surprise, something comes up that reveals what we're being told just isn't the case.

there are issues with the cam footage. *Shooter walks in wearing Puma, Dead Wearing Vans. Different sneakers. Can find both pairs on Amazon. *4:07 - "where did THEY go in?" -- more than 1.. * then at the end. "Audrey" is down dead, but elsewhere, you hear an officer elsewhere screaming "Get your hands away from the gun!" ...to someone else. 5:53... and it's hard to make out what another is yelling about also. * 6:01 - "Audrey" is dead but watch - her wrist moves!

Is that on Netflix?

If everything was so perfect with the Framers, then how did we end up like this?

I'm not a fan of Rothbard at all. It is endemic to laissez-faire capitalism to have booms, busts, crises, and depressions. There were many, many of these before the Great Depression, which I still maintain began before the Fed attempted to respond, and, like all before it, such as the Long Depression, is just what happens when you allow economics to run amok and usurists and financiers to hoard markets. The problem is not too much control, it is not enough control, without ethics, and it began long before the Fed was instituted. The separation of economics from ethics was an Englightenment philosophy. I reject it, unlike Rothbard, who was not an historian, and was a proponent of falsehoods.

strong enough political opposition. A long time ago. The Depression was already happening before the Fed responded. It was consequential of the excesses of oligarchic capitalism, as the new America that disposed of the old began to corrupt the country. When the Fed rose rates to try and ward off the overspeculation and gambling in financial markets (another problem is the over-sophistication of financial markets, that has nothing to do with the Fed), and the Fed was still not expanding the money supply, it was a more conservative Fed, and the Fed did not go off the rails until the REPRESENTATIVES demanded that it become more centralized, with more powers (unemployment mandate), and expansion of the money supply (debt, liquidity, bailouts), all demanded by REPRESENTATIVES. Including FDR who was an elected REPRESENTATIVE. But there was only 10-20 Billion dollars in total circulation as late as the 1950's.

No quarter, No respect, No tolerance for the transmonster establishment. This disease must be fought as if it were life or death. It must be stabbed in its black heart like a vampire, burned and buried 12 feet under.

There is no connection between the Federal Reserve Act and the Sixteenth Amendment, other than they are both bad, and both were implemented by representatives. It was a long time before the Fed became such a bad actor operationally, and also a long time before personal income tax grew to current levels. All of the progressions were instituted BY representatives, duly elected ones, and elections have been conducted over and over again, and these monsters only grow longer in the tooth. I oppose representation. I support law and permanent moral leadership. Then, we can get about helping this motley crue called humanity lift up and progress as a species, rather than retard ourselves by the machinations of division, greed, laziness, immorality and relativism. Enough is Enough, or we will collapse. The American political experiment was a mistake. I do not believe in its tenets anymore.

Biden - introduces himself as husband of Jill Biden, calls out "good-looking kids", talks about his big ice cream fridge today to audience about school shooting https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2023/03/27/joe-bidens-response-to-deadly-nashville-shooting-is-genuinely-appalling/ purported shooter is Audrey going as Aiden Hale, a gender-confused 28 year old twitter has pics

28 mins start there. Knowing what he had to talk about President of the United States by introducing himself as married to Dr Jill Biden, loves ice cream, chocolate chip is his favorite, and that the kids all look great, asking them to stand up... then he goes into fake sympathy routine, asks congress to ban assault weapons, then clicks back to big creepy smile again. Seriously lots wrong here. Scary.

The Covenant School is located at 33 Burton Hills Blvd March = 3 27 = 3 x 9 (3 x 3) & 2+7 = 9 (3 x 3) victim deaths = 6 (3+3) 3 children, 3 adults. total deaths = 7 2023 = 7

pdf of the study https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/WSJ_NORC_ToplineMarc_2023.pdf

It was only the Republicans that were against income taxes. They thought the 16th would fail but it didn't fail or even come close to failing. In the 1890's there was a large, popular social reform movement. That's why the Anti-Trust Laws and Labor Laws began introducing democratic restraints against unfettered Gilded Age excesses and abuses. That trend continued and should be seen in the light of progressive needs for communities, not far off from the beginnings of public education, roads and sewerage, electric transportation, etc. There is no reason to make such a big deal about perceived subterfuge. American history is chock-full of that. For example, Rhode Island was bullied into even signing the Constitution. Subterfuge and involuntary cooperation with power extends back to the War of Independence. You are correct to say, however, that SCOTUS is not the final word - not when the representatives are at supra-majority odds with the Judicial Branch. But, it wasn't SCOTUS that brought us the income tax.

I have four. 2 of them are still working from the 90's. "vintage".

No lies from me here.

It's not going to happen. They did private polling and saw the results. Move On.

I don't think they bother to give reasons for "why" anymore.

Sixteenth Amendment: "You may eat any fruit in the orchard". "johnwk": "But it doesn't say you may eat apples!". Nothing more to say.

No, it's not broke... but it broke the U.S. That is, until or unless the U.S. stands up to it.

ergo, it has the power to collect ( direct = without apportionment ) taxes on incomes from ( whatever source derived = earned ). that is all. If you can't understand that, I refuse to speak to you any further.

Some of them were men of faith, and most felt guided by God (as they understood that) - in the Freemasonic manner... but that is heresy, because only the Church was instituted by Christ Himself with the power from the Holy Spirit to bind and loose, and with His Vicar, the Bishop of Rome, who coronates Kings and Emperors in sacramental rites... this is what was done, and it is what they sought to usurp. It is what preserved righteousness, and the Illuminati, Jews and Masons overthrew it in the American and French revolutions. The door was open to Satan, and He pushed it open gradually... until it is wide open as the road to perdition that is Man deciding for himself what is Right and what is Wrong - the very Original Sin that cursed us all.

without apportionment = direct.

Seriously, do you have a crayon stuck in your brain like Homer Simpson or something? It's what it did. It's what is says. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which, when ratified by the legislature of three-fourths of the several States, shall be valid to all intents and purposes as a part of the Constitution: "ARTICLE XVI. The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

The only reason for the Eisner ruling was the stock divided was not even really a dividend, and it wasn't income either, it was essentially a forward stock split accomplished by issuing new shares to all. If there was any real gain in that dividend, including an increase in Macomber's ownership, which didn't happen due to the nature of it, the court would have ruled the other way. So it's totally inapplicable to the 16th Amendment powers. That's the only reason she won, and the only reason she brought the case.