Snowball
Member

now we know why Trump didn't put her in his cabinet.

I thought they were dismantled, either right away or not soon thereafter. It doesn't matter now, anyway. The point is those were better days for us all.

hey look just in time ! a new Israel-US friendly regime change army in Syria! https://news.antiwar.com/2024/11/29/hundreds-dead-fighting-rages-as-syrian-islamist-rebels-reach-aleppo/

:sarcasm:

Sevastopol was always there, the Ukrainians allowed it, under agreement, is how. Anyway, what do you really think about this now, say, if you were Potus, what would you do?

Given the recent "hearings" in "Congress" over the matter, I thought I would share my thoughts further. Before I do, I wanted also to draw attention to another older thread that sheds more light on the evil lies they tell: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?551098-Former-Head-of-Israel-s-Space-Program-The-Aliens-Asked-Not-To-Be-Revealed&highlight=aliens Now.. Guys...you know, the U.S. and a small number of particular nations are inside the loop of Top Secret and Above Top Secret Special Access Programs that do not figure in to the over-the-table discussions and evaluations of military power. This is a fact that makes some of the capabilities assessments and the scenario expectations irrelevant, because nobody can assess contingencies in war accurately without being privy to state secrets and non-state secrets, that includes trans-state secrets, because the UFO, UAP, USO phenomenon definitely is present within particular nations -- those are the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Italy, the Holy See, Australia and New Zealand, and possibly Israel in one group (this group also has a presence in the oceans and in Argentina and Paraguay), then, Russia, China, North Korea, and whomever else these share certain information with, possibly Iran, for instance. This is the two superpower groups and each has their own TS SAP's. The biggest difference between them is that the Allies unit is NOT entirely controlled by the civlian government, or even the Deep State in that government. It is Supragovernmental. For example, in 1933, Mussolini had a flying saucer that "crashed". The German, Austrian, Italian, and Swiss scientists were the most advanced, with the lone exception of Nikola Tesla, who was based in the U.S. physically but also was sharing his work with the Axis group, this is why the U.S. moved on him in his later years, holding him prisoner at the Waldorf Astoria. He also sold some different tech to the Soviets. Wave EM and DEW tech, not anti-gravity. I've posted about it. The information is rock solid, it was even mentioned in the press. Well, after the Axis lost Italy, that saucer, for example, was held by the Vatican, later being transferred to the Americans. The Americans got some scientists from the Axis, but others, supposedly not the best theoreticians but rather some of the best on-hands technicians, were taken by Stalin.

I guess I'll respond to this one. I do somewhat agree that the agreements are dead at this point, so Ukraine can proceed to going nuclear if they want to die. If you're thinking that the Crimean referendum to join Russia was an "invasion", that's not true. Crimea was part of Russia long before it was passed over jurisdicitonally to the Ukrainian SSR, and that only happened because Kruschev was Ukrainian. There were basically no Ukrainians living in Crimea, just Tatars and Russians. Plus, the legitimate government of Ukraine was overthrown by the CIA in 2014. So, Yanukovych has a greater right to be Ukrainian president (he still is) than Zelenskyy.

ok, I'm gonna let it rip so pardon my sarong... Unfortunately I suspect the disappointment in some of Trump's cabinet appointments, especially in the foreign policy realm* are well-founded. When one considers it's not an outlier, it's an actual pattern, then it's really warranted to start believing the duck is a duck after all. Trump was rumoured to be considering both Larry Fink, founder of Blackrock, and Jamie Dimon CEO of JP Morgan Chase for Treasury Secretary. He managed to do worse (than Dimon at least) but perhaps not Fink -- by nominating the trader who MADE Grigory Schwartz into "George Soros" with a capital S -- made him a BILLIONAIRE in the early 1990's by SMASHING the British Pound. He's also a Harriman intern (Skull & Bones), and a Wolf's Head Society member at Yale (they have their own crypt). This means that Bessent is a real enemy of state currency. You see, it's just not good enough that they own the state money, because the state money is STILL controlled by the people's reps, whether that be the Parliament, the royals, or the US Congress. What they really want to do is SEVER that tie all the way. One may say they've already done so, with the Bank of London and the Federal Reserve (actually these are the SAME ENTITY) -- however, as has been their m.o. since they took greater power, starting in the late 80s and 90s, the acceleration of the debasement program has incrementally and in COMPOUNDING FASHION debauched the people's money ALMOST completely. Trump is not going to do a single thing to stop inflation. This is why he wants Powell out, but he can't get rid of him until his term ends, because Powell has been TRYING to defend the value of the dollar with his rate hikes. Trump only cares about ASSET GROWTH for the uber-elites, so his plan is to lower interest rates back down to near-zero, so the ASSET CLASS (the unearned income class) can inflate their asset values in the equity markets. This includes the neo-asset cryptocurrencies which Bessent is a huge advocate for. Along with the surveillance and blockchain tyranny benefits, ultimately the cryptos are planned to linked to bio-chips and personal bank accounts directly fed into the matrix, for which patents like Microsoft's 666 patent have already been awarded years ago. Since cryptos such as the "bitcoin" have absolutely no inherent value, they cannot be assessed on a financial basis, like all other tangible assets can. This means they may be deemed to be worth a billion dollars per "bitcoin", or zero dollars per "bitcoin". Without an actual presence in the physical reality, the cryptos are mere computer programs. The programs are coded to perform certain price reactions, but those coded pricing algorithms are not necessarily coded to react to "supply and demand" mechanisms. This means that a cryptocurrency can actually rise in dollar value even if more people are selling it than buying it. It means that the crypto elites can UNLOAD at any exit point they choose, at any value they select, while the unknowing peons and pumpers can spend more and more dollars to buy the "bitcoin", and the price can rise, even when the sell ratio is say, 9-1. As this crypto regime expands, the people's monies, in all countries, are debased further, exchanged at less and less value, and while the people exchange real money (lawful money) for the fake asset (they don't care if it has no inherent value, they only care that it's "going up") they are deprived of the lawful money that is controlled by them, and its held ratios decrease. As the held ratios decrease, they exchange value drops, because the currency markets, the forex, are NOT pre-programmed like crypto, they are still operated by actual humans with needful deposits whether they buy or sell, it moves that market, and the values are also interpreted to have real-world drivers, such as government data in that country and the state of its economic health.

Not really, because there are stipulations, two of them, the one in the 5th section is looser than the first. Self-defense, allies, etc. Also, these stipulations are only about the NPT and Budapest Memoradum's terms, namely that Ukraine be non-nuclear, and the subject we were considering here IS Ukraine going nuclear. Additionally, Ukraine was cooking up WMD in biolabs. Moreover, the Ukrainian government today is ILLEGITIMATE, not only because Zelensky's term is far over, and he declared all politics illegal, but also because there are other agreements that Ukraine has violated between Russia and Ukraine, like the Friendship Treaty. Finally, Ukraine has attacked the Russians in the Donbass and in Odessa and Crimea for a long time. This is self-defense. Crimea is part of Russia, but even before, when Ukraine burned the town hall in Odessa with Russians in it, that was murder, like the 10k+ Russians inside Ukraine they killed before this even started. They never, not for a second, adhered to the Minsk Memorandum of 2014. The Minsk was violated because "Ukraine" didn't want ANY sort of semi-autonomy for Donbass. The semi-autonomy was basically going to be like we have states with governors and legislatures here. That's all. But Ukraine decided to KILL THEM INSTEAD. Then, it MASSED ITS ARMY and started shelling them again before Russia stepped in. Now, Ukraine has attacked Russia so many times that it doesn't matter anyway. I suppose this means you can consider the Budapest Memorandum, and the Lisbon Protocol dead, but that's up to the US to work in Ukraine, but I would argue it's still illegitimate because Zelensky has violated the Ukrainian consitition many times. Alas, if the US, UK, or Ukrainian junta regime really want nukes, I guess they can TRY to get them in there and fire them at Russia. It would be stupid, they would just be shot down, and if they exploded dirty or otherwise, I guess their rulers can finish the job and wipe out Ukraine. I understand they like things dead if they can't own them. It's what they decided even in 2022 when they left the Istanbul talks after an agreement was reached, because Blackrock tells them what to do, as Blackrock has already stolen all the Ukrainian rebuilding, farm and resource rights.

Nothing came out of the meeting except parliamentary recommendations for Ukraine to join NATO These have no force and at least 7 NATO members are in official opposition. It was a fail for the war hawks. We are going to survive until January 20th because the Pentagon HATES Blinken and Biden and will save us from war.

You know, I was going to paste the whole text but I think you're just clowning around, as usual. This is no laughing matter. Ukraine's early presidents were anti-war. They were not lunatics, unlike since the Maidan Coup, and neither were Bush, Yeltsin, or even Clinton. Unfortunately, now, we are controlled by lunatics, at least for a while longer, and nonproliferation of nuclear weapons is not happening. When Ukraine became a country it adopted the Lisbon Protocol and that's why, like the other Soviet regions that held nukes, Russia agreed to let them EVEN BE countries at all.

Ukraine never had nukes. The arsenal was always under the control of Moscow, and it was in their agreements between them to be that way.

follows through? He was only berating them because he wants them to spend more money on mililtary.

That sentence is a lie, because they want us to think two things 1) Ukraine's weapons were taken from it 2) We have them In reality, they NEVER WERE "Ukraine's". They were Soviet and Russia had the rights of ownership because Russia was the seat of the USSR, and Ukraine was not even a country at all. Moreover, it was US who demanded this, because WE didn't want the new country to have its own nukes. All were dismantled (although black-market suspiscions exist) -- according to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and Budapest Memorandum. Now, the people who control the US want to renege on the Budapest Memorandum. Then they want to take the weapons-grade material and assemble new nukes for "Ukraine", and say they are "giving them back".

He's totally right. Alta Vista was a far superior search engine to Google. Didn't matter. Only capital matters in our system today.

Big Emergency Meeting tomorrow NATO and Ukraine

And it has been since before the War of Independence... yes, Sir.

It most certainly seems that way. Or it has something to do with the private affairs of the Biden family and the whole, Hunter-Burisma story with WW3 being a just a side effect.

Trump's Treasury pick hates sovereign money, is a crypto queen and will devalue the dollar to oblivion. No wonder why he helped Soros kill the pound. The people's money (CONSTITUTIONAL) is their enemy... crypto is their friend because it produces wealth for the insiders as it is programmed with the benefit of surveillance and digital high finance. This is why Trump wants Powell out, because Powell doesn't want to kill the dollar. When Trump said he wants to keep the dollar as the world reserve currency, he's talking about military and political dominance only, not real value, just forcing others to use it, because it will keep them controlled and dependent.

What the heck are you talking about? That is NOT even remotely what any of them said. Utterly false representation of the content. Your only reason to post was to "spam" the stuff YOU wanted to post about. I am surprised at this, man.

he's related to Bibi (Mileikowsky) name changed to Netanyahu. Mileikowsky is the Polish variant of Milei.

Bessent is Wolf's Head at Yale and interned at Brown Brothers Harriman. Scam rolls on.

doesn't seem qualified.

aww c'mon man that's too negative

yeah, I found out on the news hours later. what a coinkydink.

I suggest Pam Bondi.

Being Pro-Israel means telling them they've had enough and you're calling the cops for a ride home.

Putin will save us.