Snowball
Member

I have four. 2 of them are still working from the 90's. "vintage".

No lies from me here.

It's not going to happen. They did private polling and saw the results. Move On.

I don't think they bother to give reasons for "why" anymore.

Sixteenth Amendment: "You may eat any fruit in the orchard". "johnwk": "But it doesn't say you may eat apples!". Nothing more to say.

No, it's not broke... but it broke the U.S. That is, until or unless the U.S. stands up to it.

ergo, it has the power to collect ( direct = without apportionment ) taxes on incomes from ( whatever source derived = earned ). that is all. If you can't understand that, I refuse to speak to you any further.

Some of them were men of faith, and most felt guided by God (as they understood that) - in the Freemasonic manner... but that is heresy, because only the Church was instituted by Christ Himself with the power from the Holy Spirit to bind and loose, and with His Vicar, the Bishop of Rome, who coronates Kings and Emperors in sacramental rites... this is what was done, and it is what they sought to usurp. It is what preserved righteousness, and the Illuminati, Jews and Masons overthrew it in the American and French revolutions. The door was open to Satan, and He pushed it open gradually... until it is wide open as the road to perdition that is Man deciding for himself what is Right and what is Wrong - the very Original Sin that cursed us all.

without apportionment = direct.

Seriously, do you have a crayon stuck in your brain like Homer Simpson or something? It's what it did. It's what is says. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which, when ratified by the legislature of three-fourths of the several States, shall be valid to all intents and purposes as a part of the Constitution: "ARTICLE XVI. The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

The only reason for the Eisner ruling was the stock divided was not even really a dividend, and it wasn't income either, it was essentially a forward stock split accomplished by issuing new shares to all. If there was any real gain in that dividend, including an increase in Macomber's ownership, which didn't happen due to the nature of it, the court would have ruled the other way. So it's totally inapplicable to the 16th Amendment powers. That's the only reason she won, and the only reason she brought the case.

It doesn't violate the Constitution. The Constitution MADE IT HAPPEN.

The people birthed the Cabal, and the Cabal is birthing the people. It was always a plot. A plot against Altar, Throne and Hearth. We are late in the progress it has made.. and it is coming for the person last - after it was done with the Church, the King, and the Family... it's coming for our very humanity.

I have to repeat myself. C+P from Post #26.. "No taxation without representation" has always been a scam. Our ancestors WERE REPRESENTED. We just don't like what their representatives APPROVED. It was made possible WITH Representation. That IS the problem. Representation IS the problem. It is WHY we are HERE.

A power that's never been used, and is STILL DELIMITED by it's collective majoritarian requirement. Therefore it is NOT a State power individually but rather only in the COLLECTIVE and expressed as a 2/3 Majority. "No taxation without representation" has always been a scam. Our ancestors WERE REPRESENTED. We just don't like what their representatives APPROVED.

you asked -- "what change?" So, now you acknowledge the law. Ok. And perhaps you acknowledge that the law changed. What remains to discuss?

Sixteenth Amendment The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. THAT IS THE LAW. If you want to get rid of it, you need ANOTHER AMENDMENT.

The 16th Amendment, like ALL amendments, supercedes Congress. Since it was ratified by the States as an amendment, it, as an AMENDMENT, AMENDS the Constitution. The Amendments are the most powerful resource States have to affect Federal change. You and john just don't like that change. Neither do I, but it's the LAW. LEGALLY.

The digital dollar is in full swing per Biden's Executive Order, Fed wants it... We know DeSantis is against .. and has pledged to stop it. Trump? I doubt it.

as I watch two black men kiss romantically, and a tranny dance with a short gay man, in a commercial on the TENNIS CHANNEL at 9am.

Would like to see Rand take Mitch McConnell's job in the Senate. Of course, POTUS also.

How Trump singlehandedly in live session at White House rejected Pentagon, CIA recommendation to hit Iran with a strike package in 2019. CENTCOM (McKenzie) intentionally flew UAV into Iranian air space, when they shot it down, Bolton and Pompeo and the Chiefs of Staff went to Trump in the Oval Office and said they recommenend launching the strike package immediately.. Trump refused them right to their faces and said no. If it weren't for Trump, the Iran War would have already happened. That part is 26 min+

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis proposes banning a digital currency from the Fed, arguing it will stifle innovation and promote surveillance https://news.yahoo.com/florida-governor-ron-desantis-proposes-162504069.html

They are sane, but also evil.

UK MOD reconfirms YES we are sending DU ammo. US tanks coming soon, won't say yes or no. Russia will find out either way. https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-03-21-23/h_6c4f21062d851b7e11a87d6c92b99153 I don't think anyone should be surprised if Russia deems it necessary to implement low yield nukes they will do it. We're on the road to much, much more dying and destruction.

Everything is white ... could her racism possibly be more obvious?