Snowball
Member

They lack the millitary capacity to go to war with Russia unless they accept the full destruction of America.

Yes, that would be correct. Somewhere between low 40s-low 50s percent of Americans do have no problem with or indeed want those things. Some of them are more popular than others, however, these numbers are on par with the percent of Americans who want Donald Trump in the office again. It is by no means odd if Harris wins. We're about half a liberal, socialist, feminist, secular country now, many of whom are dependent on the states and feds for life's necessities, and many of them are lured in by the prospects of more free stuff, like tuition and apartments.

I like Ron's essay. One word I sensed as important: "assume". Vis-a-vis Harris with Ukraine. The fact is, you have to assume, but it is only an assumption, that she would continue Team Biden's policies. Those policies are old. Obama is and was clearly against it, even though he did allow the regime change op, the path taken from 2022 onward, he spoke out against. The facts in Ukraine are going to be determined by RUSSIA now. Harris is likely to be much more practical, given the events of the last, will be 3 years if she takes office. I've heard insiders say she does intend to change the whole team. Harris could take some wind out of Trump's sail if she indicated her willingness to bargain or admit realities with Russia. She may even see them. The problem is, too many of her party perhaps are not yet. And she doesn't want to have to 'spain it to the globalist media. She can't do anything about it anyway without going to war against Russia, and she's highly unlikely to do that. Even now, Biden is resisting the call from UK to use Storm Shadows against Russia itself, and certainly isn't going to allow Ukraine to use the types of very long-range missiles with ultra-high payload capacities they desire. The Dems just don't want to admit they were wrong. Once the election is over, Ukraine is on its way out. No matter who wins, it's on its way out. Russia is going to get exactly what it needs. There's not a thing any American president can do about it, even if they wanted to.

and your point is?

Oh, so does this mean all the states and munis that have been violating the supremacy clause in regards to undocumented immigration and refusal to cooperate with ICE will be held accountable?

One may discern the seed that sprouted our current state of affairs socially in letters such as this. Joseph C. Lovejoy went on a tour of the antebellum South, right before the War Between The States. Lovejoy, and Owen, whom he is addressing here, were both brothers of the murdered abolitionist Elijah Lovejoy. Joseph is not pro-slavery. He's just asking his brother up North to consider what's happening, and the best way to politically conduct any dissolution of slavery... peaceably, democratically, from within. Instead, the country was thrown into its worst turmoil. He says better to allow slaveholding to migrate to new states in the West, along with abolitionism, then let these new states, after their admission to the Union, decide for themselves at the State Level whether or not to outlaw the practice. This is a proposition that would have likely warded off the Civil War. He thought the nature and aspect of abolitionism was going to cause more harm than good. It was 1859, and he was right. But there are just a few sentences I wanted to draw attention to, and it's not about slavery, it's about the seeds of secular humanism, the fruit from which we are living in our times. The letter is only 12 pages.

By no means did Trump say he would release "the information the US government has kept under wraps for over 60 years now." He promised to appoint an assassinations commission and regarding the John F. Kennedy assassination, to release, "all REMAINING documents". REMAINING documents. LOL. You think the perps didn't cover their paper trail in 60 years? C'mon Man. And it's a far cry from what Trump told Napolitano. "You'd know why I can't" -- so, the chances of REMAINING documents telling the truth? I put that at ZERO. Now, regarding Giraldi's essay, I continued to read the rest. It doesn't go on much longer, but what it does point our is how shabbos goy (see quote below) Ron DeSantis, as Fla. Gov, REFUSED multiple times to meet with USS Liberty survivors. Even the American Legion throws them the cold shoulder -- for fear of the Jews.

This integration of RFK Jr. and Tulsi on the staffing team makes me consider how they will have the ear of Trump's sons, and Trump himself in official discussions. I feel that most tend to overestimate the Trumps' awareness and knowledge. The more prescient fact is that the Trump can learn a lot from RFK Jr., and Tulsi can be very convincing on her own. They will help Trump's inner circle THINK OF THINGS and SEE THINGS they haven't considered before. Might they sway the board in one way or another? Definitely, that's why he put them there. He also put them there to speak up in matters where he won't have to. It shows that he (and his sons) are willing to listen, and are not afraid or put off by being challenged in their assumptions and their proclivities. It is also a MAJOR signal to the GOP. The signal is that the GOP and Think Tanks are being DEMOTED.

They aren't done yet. Kiev Seeks Permission for Strategic Strikes Deep in Russian Hinterland: Gives US List of Russian Targets and Requests JASSM-ER for F-16s "The US is playing with fire," says Moscow info@warnews247.gr 27.08.2024 | 21:13 Ukrainian officials are preparing to present a detailed list of potential military targets in Russia to US national security officials in a bid to persuade Washington to lift its restrictions on the use of US weapons for strikes inside Russian territory.

But the same applies in this regard. How in the world would Kuh Mahh Luh Harris be better for the Con. than DJT?

None of what happened or will happen is even remotely surprising to those of us who remember Donald Trump from the 70s and 80s and even the 90s. What DOES surprise us is that so MANY conservatives thought and think he was/is someone that he never was. Still, if I had to choose between him and Kamala Harris, he's my pick. It is what it is.

It came down to public vs. private debts and those are two different things. George III was very lenient, until some colonies exploited their currencies too badly. https://www.thoughtco.com/currency-act-of-1764-104858 This is a big can of worms, especially when we use fiat now and it's objectively legal for both private and public. What makes it legal is that it's Federal, not State. However my point about bitcoin as a potential "currency" (it can never be) is that it's not Constitutional only because it's not regulated by the people's representatives.

"you for thinking preventing states from issuing any currency but certificates of deposits of silver and gold is Fed-like "control" well, it is. this is why Rhode Island didn't want to sign. They were "persuaded"...

Now we know why Trump really wants him stopping in the White House often...

He understood it better than he does now. But trust me, he STILL understands it. And he's not right. Using Federal funds to boost bitcoin and crypto development is corrupt. Btw. Your last line is hilarious and SAD at the same time. Of COURSE I want the Fed (Federal Government, not Federal Reserve, that IS) and our duly-elected politicians to control the money supply. It's what the CONSTITUTION MANDATES. :eek:

It's al about control, surveillance, breaking down the connection between the people's government and the people's money, and cementing the oligarchy, with AI and automated wealth forever, if you are part of the conspiracy. Beast AI patent legally enforced now. Mind control, body control. "Cryptocurrency system 150 may include one or more processors for processing commands and one or more memories storing information in one or more cryptocurrency data structures. In some embodiments, cryptocurrency system 150 may be a centralized cryptocurrency system or network, for example, but not limited to, a server which may be privately run by a third-party entity or the same entity that is running the task server 110." http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?545803-Beast-AI-patent-legally-enforced-now-Mind-control-body-control&highlight=cryptocurrency "This is done by the operatons of the Fed and its tentacle banks, and its daughter corporations, which exist also in private equity, family offices, and multinational institutions, foundations, and even in the black markets which are connected to cryptocurrency and organized crime."

It was always a psyop. IMO.

None of them are as good as MANY foreign leaders. Something to be ashamed of.

Today Trump ridiculously says of Harris: "She caused the Attack of October 7th," https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-816015 https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/trump-blames-harris-for-october-7-says-iran-was-broke-prior-to-bidens-presidency/ https://www.middleeasteye.net/live-blog/live-blog-update/trump-blames-harris-7-october-attack

American mercs are in Kursk, Russia wearing Ukrainian uniforms to stage the False Flag. https://english.pravda.ru/news/hotspots/160427-pmc-fog/ https://eadaily.com/en/news/2024/08/21/the-american-pmc-refused-to-comment-on-its-presence-in-the-kursk-region

You have to step in line with the dear leaders's judgement and embrace RFK Jr. as a MAGA brother now.

Kennedy is going to gain big bono if his endorsement is seen as pushing Trump over the edge to victory. Looking at the polls there are certainly quite a number of states where this is the case. He has to be convincing if he's going to do it, though. He can't do it quietly. He has to get up there and make the case. I believe they have a secret agreement. It will make his endorsement appear to be more genuine than just a tit-for-tat.