BSWPaulsen
Member

This is true.

This is badly flawed logic masquerading as an enlightened platitude. It is fully possible for man to hate what they understand and love what they do not. A hatred for evil is born from understanding what evil is, and loving what is good. No, it is not. You are remarkably full of vacuous platitudes. Humans may all be from the same creator, but their actions are what gives them distinction. There will always be division among humans so long as individuality exists. Indeed. The only time doing so is not punished with misery or death is when that Marxist has not gotten their hands on the levers of power.

Partially true. Love for your compatriot, yes. Love for your enemy? I will pass on that. There is a time for hate, and a time for war.

I wonder how long it could take before reparations entails organ harvesting. That diabetic black woman was oppressed by some white guy with two functioning kidneys, you know? Given the health awareness of conservatives, it would make even more sense. Healthy lifestyles are white supremacy only enabled by the breaking of minority bodies. (Mostly satirical)

No sourcing is necessary. Whatever significance one wishes to attach to what is occurring does not change the fact that Whites are being actively replaced as the demographic majority in this country. One year passed, and you learned nothing at all. Sad.

It is a phrase that explicitly highlights the demographic decline of Whites in this country. It is a documented fact that has been set in motion since 1965. Your attempt to disparage it with a wikipedia link that is tantamount to propaganda speaks volumes about you. Speaking of which, this little action of yours reminded me of a certain banned user named Superfluous Man that acted similarly when it came to this sort of subject. It is curious his existence ends around where yours began. Actually, it is not curious at all. You are the same user. Oh, that curiously propagandistic "11 million people" that goes unquestioned by the Trump deranged troll, but that would be questioned if Trump had thrown it out there. The number of illegal aliens is higher than that and has been for many years (most recent studies peg it well north of 20 million people). Additionally, anchor babies are extraordinarily likely to retain the political beliefs of their parents, so whether the parent can vote is of marginal significance. Aside from that, it is not difficult to make self-deportation desirable. Cutting off anchor babies and welfare would be a great start. Following it up with rapid deportation for any criminal offenses would further reduce the desirability of living here as settling down would carry with it significant psychological anxiety.

Irrelevant. Corporate "will" is often a reflection of governmental demand and backroom dealings designed to increase their profit margins with state assistance. They are essentially one and the same, and Eunuch Libertarians that give free reign to corporations to do things they would not allow the government to do are the instrument of their own demise.

This is extremely critical. Never, ever wait for the enemy to choose the time and place of battle. At that point, the fight should be taken to them.

Yeah, a company that routinely petitions the government for bailout money can do whatever they want! You are the reason the phrase "useful idiot" exists.

It is not the kind of thread to have much time left anyway. Most people here are united in opposition to the things posing a clear threat to us all, like "The Great Reset", and I share your pessimism regarding the state of the population's awareness of issues potentially affecting them. We will just have to see what the future holds and do our best to educate the unknowing.

The poll is linear in purpose. It is essentially a discussion between the three options listed and has limited purpose beyond that. The only significance of the voter fraud issue is in increasing general awareness of governmental corruption among the population. You seem to be caught up in the potential significance of that awareness, and its potential significance is unknown at this time. It may well be that some people elect to dig deeper and learn more and others may not do so at all. Your attempt to discuss this with me and highlighting the importance of things like "The Great Reset" is preaching to the choir. I am not unaware of the threat posed by it, but it is tangential to the discussion.

If you think that is my stance, then you are not attempting to understand my stance at all. The thread posed a question. I answered the question. Whether other people understand your perspective has no bearing at all on whether there is an increased awareness of corruption. Those other people learned something about corruption they did not know prior to this, and that is sufficient in demonstrating the corruption is more glaring than previously. I get your pessimism runs extraordinarily deep on account of how you "get it" and the vast majority of humanity does not. However, that has little bearing here.

Your sarcasm aside, the noticeable increase in the number of people believing voting is pointless on account of a corrupted process is indicative of my stance. Someone arguing there has been no change would have a tough case to make that is not just their pessimism run amok.

That is not how logical progression works and even if it were, logical progression for a "crazy" person is often not linear. That said, your dubious logic is befitting of someone having an obsession. You are deranged and need help.

It is just as corrupt as ever, but there is now more of the population with an awareness of it.

The Trump deranged troll is back at it with more of his insanity.

He gets full credit from me for increasing general awareness of corruption. However, that was not some heroic crusade he waged against the left as was insinuated in the post I responded to. It was a beneficial side-effect of his presidency, and I am thankful for it. At the present time, his fight against the corruption is over due to his need for self-preservation, and it falls to patriots to be absolutely ungovernable pains in the asses that actively subvert the left at every turn.

If he did such a thing at all, then it was entirely by accident. Given all of the fight has gone out of him since the events of January 6th, it is clear that he is no warrior intent on bringing the left's evil to task. Self-preservation is very much at the top of his priorities at this time.

Irrelevant. Nostradamus at work predicting violence from the right while being curiously silent about the left. You are so deranged when it comes to Trump and Trump supporters that you obsess about their shortcomings even if they have not actually done something.

A president getting impeached over nothing twice happens every 4 years? What parallel universe are you living in? Your Trump derangement is so damned strong you are worried a "Trum(p)kin is going to kill Biden and Harris" and trying to shift the discussion to potential violence from the right instead of any focus on what the left is doing right now. You are every bit as disingenuous as Invisible Man.

Your disingenuousness knows no bounds. Answer the damned question instead of trying to shift the subject to something irrelevant.

Indeed. It will not be a peaceful process if it is to be successful for those desiring liberty. The left will not allow it.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Eunuch Libertarian in action. An individual so ineffectual their sole purpose is to defend the same things that will lead to their personal destruction. At best, it is a person compelled to become a martyr. At worst, they are a danger to everyone around them.

I question the effectiveness of armed protests. It runs the risk of allowing the enemy to identify and make a potential target of you. Protestors go home and sleep eventually, but the state can pursue you at their leisure. They will always strike when you are at your weakest and most disorganized. For similar reasons, violent rhetoric online is unwise. If one is armed, capable, and wishes to make the aggressors pay for their actions, then it is better to wait, be patient, plan, strike when it is most inconvenient to them, and retain the ability to perform more strikes in the future. It is neither glorious nor honorable, but it is effective. A historical precedent for an American is the founders' use of guerilla warfare. The significance of armed Americans is not and has never been their defensive use. It is only the potential for going on the offensive that instills fear in the government such that their appetite for our liberties is diminished.

It is not some kind of benign thought experiment because if that were the case, then it would not be fit to print. It is explicitly designed to shift the framing of the discussion and discourage people from engaging in similar behavior by emphasizing potential repercussions. It is an extraordinarily pure form of propaganda. Only useful idiots attempt to treat it as anything but that.